From July 19-22,
2011, Mr. Ron Cannan, M.P., Vice-Chair led a delegation from the Canadian
Section of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) to the 21st
Annual Summit of the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region (PNWER) in Portland,
Oregon. The other members of the delegation were the Honourable Raynell
Andreychuk, Senator, the Honourable Wilfred Moore, Q.C., Senator, the
Honourable Hedy Fry, P.C., M.P. and the Honourable Rob Merrifield, P.C., M.P.
They were accompanied by the Canadian Section’s Executive Secretary, Ms. Angela
Crandall and, and Mr. James Lee, Advisor to the Canadian Section.
THE EVENT
Established in 1991, PNWER is a statutory, bilateral,
regional, private-public sector group that includes Alaska, Idaho, Montana,
Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Yukon and the
Northwest Territories. The aims of the organization are to:
promote greater regional collaboration,
enhance the competitiveness of the region in
domestic and international markets,
leverage regional influence in Ottawa and
Washington, D.C., and
achieve continued economic growth while maintaining the
region’s natural environment.
DELEGATION
OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
The Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group
aims to find points of convergence in respective national policies, to initiate
dialogue on points of divergence, to encourage the exchange of information, and
to promote better understanding among legislators on shared issues of concern.
In addition to regular meetings with their federal
counterparts, in recent years, members of the Canadian Section of the IPG have
attended meetings of private-public sector groups, such as PNWER. At events
such as these, Canadian delegates take the opportunity to engage in
conversations that will help achieve the Canadian Section’s objectives, and to
communicate the nature and scope of the bilateral relationship.
At the 2011
Annual Summit, delegates had a number of opportunities to express their views
and provide input on a variety of topics. They considered attendance at the
meeting to be a prime opportunity to meet with state and provincial legislators
as well as representatives of the private sector from a number of jurisdictions,
to enhance Canada-US relations and to provide a sound basis for working on
issues that are common to both countries. The Canadian Section of the IPG
intends to attend PNWER’s future annual summits and to continue its work in
advocating Canadian interests.
ACTIVITIES
DURING THE EVENT
During PNWER’s 2011 Annual Summit, a number of policy
tours were held, keynote presentations were made and concurrent discussions
occurred in the following areas:
Legislative Energy Horizon Institute
Transportation Institute
Trade and Economic Development
Renewable Energy
Tourism
Transportation
Disaster Resilience: Energy Assurance
Workforce
Invasive Species
Arctic Caucus
Energy
Columbia River Treaty Symposium
Cross-Border Livestock Health
Sustainable Development
Washington/Regional Legislative Hearing on Innovation
Border Solutions Council
Natural Resource Development: Mining
Innovation
Ocean Energy
Energy Storage
Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Natural Gas Vehicles
Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Electric Vehicles
Water Policy
Cross-Border Livestock Health
Health Care
Women in
Natural Resources
This report
summarizes the presentations that were made and discussions that occurred at
selected sessions during the 2011 Annual Summit, which was entitled “A Toast to
Innovation.”
WELCOMING
REMARKS
Governor John
Kitzhaber, Governor of Oregon
The transportation system in Oregon is not
sustainable in the long term
The challenge of leadership is to describe a “new growth” model in such a way that people will be comfortable
with it
We should focus on the goal, and mitigating any
problems in the transition to it
Ask whether you are part of the problem, and
foster discussion
Things are not “bad”; the world is changing, so the tools must
change as well
TRADE AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP
Promoting
Competitiveness in the US-Canada Supply Chain
Courtney
Gregoire, US Department of Commerce
President Obama announced the National Export
Initiative (NEI) in his State of the Union Address in January 2010, with
the “ambitious but attainable” goal of doubling exports over the
next five years
While exports accounted for about 10% of US gross
domestic product (GDP) in 2010, about 1% of US companies are exporting,
and 58% of these companies export to one market
The NEI has five areas:
Øadvocacy and trade promotion
Øexport financing and credit
Øremoving barriers to trade
Øenforcing trade laws to level the playing field
Øpursuing policies at the global level for
balanced growth
As the United States does advocacy, Canada comes to
mind first; 19.5% of US exports went to Canada in 2010
The February 2011 announcement about a Canada-US
perimeter security and economic competitiveness agendawas
important
While some banks in the US will not fund
businesses to expand abroad, the US Department of Commerce does outreach
and encourages dialogue among banks
the NEI will hopefully raise the level of the
debate about trade issues in the United States
Business travel is important
Tourism is an export as well
Visa problems keep foreign buyers from entering
the United States
There is “regulatory overkill” in terms of the
inspection of agricultural and food products; there should be mutual
recognition of inspection systems
The export.gov website is designed to help
educate companies, but Canadian virtual trade counsellors were light years
ahead of what the US government is doing
People need to change the way that they think
about trade and export; the next generation, including those in technical
colleges, should be encouraged
All of the issues raised here today are interrelated—economic
development cannot occur in a silo
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons
PNWER has always been forward-thinking,
identifying problems, finding solutions and concentrating on
implementation
Canada-US trade has doubled since implementation
of the North American Free Trade Agreement; 70.4% of Canadian
exports went to the United States in 2010, and Canada was the primary
foreign export market for 34 US states was in the top three of 12 other
states
Most Americans do not know much about Canada, and
Canadians really do not know enough about Americans
Trade between Canada and the United States has declined
in this region since 2000;
Since September 11, 2001, security has “trumped”
trade
It is not possible for a country to tax its way
to prosperity; instead, it must grow
The border between Canada and the United States
must be “thinned” and it must be made safer
Terrorists must be stopped outside North America
through a perimeter approach to security
China is an opportunity, as are India and Brazil
One question is how Canada and the United States
can capitalize on opportunities; the two countries do not just trade with
each other: they also build things together and must be competitive
Focus on the key irritants and look for solutions
The Doha Round of World Trade Organization
negotiations and trade deal between Canada and the United States is coming
Goods move across the shared Canada-US border
much more easily than do business people, and a ten-year business visa has
recently been announced
Labour mobility problems among Canadian provinces
have started to be addressed
Canada is good in terms of research, but weak in
terms of development
Economic growth will come from Asia, India and South America,
and the states, provinces and businesses in PNWER can capitalize on this
growth
The New
West Partnership and its Role in Economic Development and Trade
Honourable
Iris Evans, Government of Alberta
The 2010 New West Partnership is made up of three
western provinces – Alberta, Saskatchewan, British Columbia – with a
combined population of 9 million and gross domestic product of about $500
billion; it is Canada’s largest interprovincial free trade zone
There are four agreements within the New West
Partnership, and they address:
Øeconomics – trade, investment, labour mobility,
etc.
Øinternational cooperation – greater access to
priority markets,
Øinnovation, and
Øprocurement
Pursuing such a free trade zone strategy takes
vision and resources
An American dollar spent in Canada gets more return than a
dollar spent in OPEC or in other countries
An
Introduction to the Indian Market: Focus on Agriculture
Nithi
Govindasamy, Government of Saskatchewan
Many are starting to pay attention to Asia,
including to India
India is democratic, stable, has a strong rule of
law, etc., which is good for business
Saskatchewan is the most export-dependent of all
provinces, and India is very important to Saskatchewan; exports to the
country from the province have grown substantially
Canada is in the process of negotiating a Free
Trade Agreement with India
India has food security problems, infrastructure
problems, etc.
The Indian middle class will grow
Saskatchewan will lead economic growth in Canada in 2011 and
2012; the province has arable land, grows lentils and peas, has potash for
fertilizer, etc.
Bernie Magnan,
Vancouver Board of Trade
India is large and it is difficult to get around
the country because of its geography
India had problems with the International
Monetary Fund 20 years ago, but has had a modern economy since then
Between 2000 and 2007, there was a lot of
outsourcing to India
India has a middle class of about 350 million
individuals, which is 10 times larger than the middle class in Canada and
is bigger than the middle class in the United States
Key issues in India include:
Øan infrastructure deficit
Øhandling growth
Øthe size of government
Øinflation
Øan agrarian economy
Øtrade barriers, including tariffs
Øtraditions and culture
Øcompetition from China
Opportunities for India include free trade agreements and
commodity sales
KEYNOTE
LUNCHEON
His
Excellency Ambassador Gary Doer, Canadian Ambassador to the United States
Hydroelectric power is renewable, and should be
recognized as such
There are at least three changes that are
essential:
Øgreater energy efficiency, including in respect
of cars and trucks, is in progress
Øinnovation to provide greater sustainability of
oil, including regarding the oil sands,
Øenergy and economic security (including
recognizing that US pension funds are invested in the Canadian oil sands, etc.)
Getting the Keystone XL pipeline approved will
mean jobs
The perimeter security and economic competitiveness agenda
announced in February 2011 – including terrorism, cybersecurity, etc. –
was based on the joint experience of the North American Aerospace Defense
Command (NORAD), Olympic Games security, etc.
Transportation
Working Group
Roundtable
with transportation legislators from the Cascade Corridor: Bi-national Update
on Amtrak Cascades Service
Ralph Munro, Talgo
Train:
The Washington State legislature wanted faster rail, and got a
positive response from Oregon and Canada
Denis
Stevens, Consul General, Consulate General of Canada, Seattle:
Another decision will be needed soon regarding service between
the two countries
Bob Steele, BC
Ministry of Transport:
British Columbia’s Ministry of Transportation has
good cooperation with Washington State on rail issues
There are two bodies for regional transportation
planning:
ØBritish Columbia-Washington State Joint
Transportation Executive Council
ØJoint Transportation Working Group
High speed rail (Amtrak second train) annual
ridership into British Columbia has increased significantly
There are challenges associated with new trains
Oregon
representative:
What is needed is “more, better, faster”
Oregon
senator:
The most inefficient flights are “short hops,”
and there are lots of these in the Pacific Northwest region
Europeans use rail for short hops
There is a need for better Portland-Seattle rail service
Association
of Orgeon Rail Transport Advocates:
Oregon has a funding problem
Money is not allocated correctly; “connectivity”
is needed
The Columbia River Crossing (CRC) bridge could be
done better with rail
We would support a joint train authority in Washington and
Oregon
Bernie
Magnan, Vancouver Board of Trade:
There is a need to move both people and freight, and
separate rail lines might be an option
Coal,
Grain, Wood and Potash: Where are they from and where are they going?
Bruce
Cavella, IHS Global Insight
Global
Economic overview
An increase in the cost of oil reduces economic
growth.
The world economy has two speeds – advanced
versus emerging markets – and these two speeds lead to very different
policy challenges
There is strong growth in the Asia-Pacific
region, especially in China and in India
The US recovery faces “headwinds”:
Øconsumers and businesses remain cautious
Øthere is no housing recovery
Ørising commodity prices are squeezing real
incomes
Øthe rise in oil prices could turn into a major
shock
The US recovery also faces “tailwinds:”
Øthere is strong manufacturing growth
Øfinancial markets are healing
Ølarge businesses are “flush” with cash
Øconsumer finances have strengthened
Øexports are contributing to growth
ØThere is a lot of pent-up demand for housing
Moderate economic growth will lead to a slow
decline in the unemployment rate, perhaps reaching 5% by 2020
The US recession will have a huge impact on
Canada
World trade volumes have recovered
World trade will rise again, but not at the same
growth rate as the last two decades
Trade to Asia will dominate US Pacific North
seaborne trade exports – Asia’s share will be nearly 90% by 2025
US Pacific North exports to Asia in 2010, ranked
by value:
Øgrains
Øoil seeds
Øwood
Øanimal feed
Canada seaborne exports will nearly double by
2025, with Asia accounting for the largest share at 50% of the total
Top Canadian seaborne exports by value to Asia in
2010:
ØCoal
ØOres and scrap
ØOil seeds
ØGrains
Øpulp
Øcork and wood
Øfertilizer
one question is whether the infrastructure,
labour force, policy environment, etc. exists to meet these forecasts
Overall, the recovery from the Great Recession
continues
There are two distinct balancing acts: don’t
stagnate, and don’t overheat
Greatest economic risks include higher oil
prices, fiscal austerity and sovereign debt
There is an opportunity for trade growth,
particularly with Asia
ØCoal, grain, potash, wood will see significant
growth in terms of exports
ØAre there additional opportunities with dried
fruit and chemicals?
ØIs President Obama’s National Export Initiative
a factor?
ØWhat does potential trade growth mean for job
creation?
Sam Ruda, Port
of Portland:
The Port of Portland is 105 miles upriver from
the Pacific Ocean
There are 4 railroads that can bring commodities
to the post of Portland – two American, two Canadian
Coal
Powder River Basin (PRB) coal is less expensive
and easier to mine than Appalachian coal, etc., 30% less energy content,
somewhat cleaner – it is also easier to mine, therefore the cost is lower
Northeast Wyoming is the primary source of coal
in the United States
Coal is mostly used in making steel
50% of electricity generation in the United
States comes from coal
PRB coal production has grown significantly --
from 20 million short tons in 1980 to 450 million short tons in 2008
PRB Coal for steel production had a 21% increase
in the first quarter of 2011, while coal for power generation had a 160%
increase
Regarding coal activity in Pacific Northwest,
there are two competing terminals in Washington State; Colorado coal goes
through Houston
It remains to be seen which alternative will
succeed
Is Powder River Basin coal plus rail the easiest
alternative?
Potash
Fertilizer is composed of nitrogen, phosphate and
potassium
Potash, which is also known as “wood ash,”
improves plant health and increases crop yields
Canada has half of the global reserves of potash,
with 75 billion tons in southern Saskatchewan (Campotex was formed in
1972); US potash reserves are too deep for economical mining
Gateways for Potash export are Vancouver, BC and
Portland
95% of Canadian potash moves by rail
Grain
US grain export trends – wheat is steady, but due to Chinese
demand soybeans and corn are growing
Terry Finn, BNSF
Railroad:
There is tremendous pressure to find a place for
bulk exports on the US west coast
There is significant Asian demand, especially for
coal
Coal remains a key source of energy:
ØProviding 50% of US energy
ØProviding 70% of China’s energy
ØProviding 80% of India’s energy
Keynote
Breakfast
Joe Cortright,Impresa:
Public intellectuals address questions of the day
Moving into a knowledge economy – metaphors are:
talent, innovation, connections, distinctiveness
Oregon has always seen its economy as a
reflection of its physical landscape and resources.
Sources of wealth are now created assets –
especially created knowledge -- rather than inherited ones
In Oregon, high technology displaced wood as the
primary generator of economic growth around 1990
The vital ingredients for cities are the talent,
education and skill of its population
60% of the variation in economic success among
cities is based on education; an increase of 1% in college attainment
results in $ 1.6 billion per year in output
the best educated boomers are leaving the
workforce at age 65 and at a rate of about 1 million per year
the Portland/Vancouver/Seattle region is
attractive to young and educated individuals
People put place ahead of career
Metropolitan areas are popular
Although innovation is hard to measure, one way
in which it can be measured is through patents; Portland has many patents
The term “Silicon Forest” reflects the
combination of technology and environment in this area
Connections are important, for example economic
integration in a region
Distinctiveness is also important -- each
city/province/region should determine what is unique about it
ØFor example, terms associated with Portland by
the Google trends search engine include “sustainability,” “vegan,” “farmers
market,” “fixie,” etc.
Place matters
People in Portland do 20% less driving than the
national average, which means that more than $1 billion per year can be
used for other things
The amount of driving in the US started to
decrease about 2005
The Columbia River Crossing bridge proposal is
wedded to the past economy
Freight is not the driving factor behind
metropolitan areas; talent is
Invest in tomorrow`s economy
Border
Solutions Council
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, CanadianHouse of Commons:
The goal is to “brainstorm” problems and
solutions against the background of ongoing challenges and the February
2011 announcement by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama regarding
perimeter security and economic competitiveness
Let’s seize the opportunity of this moment
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
this issue is front and centre to what PNWER is
all about – we are watching developments
The Action Plan
will probably be put off until October
We should be ready with pilot projects, private
sector support, opinion pieces, etc., especially on the US side—this is a
big issue for Ottawa, but not in Washington DC.
Most US legislators want a thicker border
This is arguably the best region to do pilot projects,
particularly given the experience of the Olympics, etc. (PNWER border
charter, etc.)
Liz Luce, former
Director of the Washington State Department of Licensing:
Enhanced Drivers Licenses (EDL) was a
cross-border pilot
281,089 enhanced drivers licenses have been
issued – about 1,000 per week – and there has been no drop off in interest
We did this quickly because we didn’t know WHTI
would be postponed
Reasons it worked:
Øeveryone was interested in the problem
ØThere was a need for a cheaper solution than
NEXUS
ØEDL are small, cheap, always with you
ØWe were persistent – it took 41 meetings before
we were invited to meet with Homeland Security in Washington, DC.
Recommendations for advocacy:
ØUse friends in high places, such as legislators
ØBe willing to adjust your idea
ØMake new friends
ØIt was all about partnerships – someone always
stepped in to save the project.
PNWER support helped with Canadians
We graduated to an approved program rather than a pilot even
before we issued our first license
Don Alper, Western
Washington University:
The tourism session this morning said visitors
from Asia need two visas-one for Canada, one for the US—it is the same for
a number of countries and regions, etc.
Let’s see if we can put visas on people
rather than countries – a common visa issued to low-risk individuals
Tourism kind of gets lost because industry
focuses on the freight aspect of borders
PNWER should focus more on tourism
Pull together appropriate industry individuals, and figure out
who the key government people are
Bernie
Magnan, Vancouver Board of Trade:
Canada had a problem with economic refugees from
Mexico
Maybe we can accept the fact that they have a visa from one
country
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
We need a tight committee to work this through conference calls
– we need a proposal by mid-September
Darrell
Bryan, President and CEO, the Victoria Clipper:
many Chinese visit BC, but much fewer visit Washington state
Dr. Greg
Douglas, Chief Veterinary Officer, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture:
In terms of an agricultural pilot program,
problem is e-certification of animal and animal
products
A few small pilots with long timelines (5-6
years), high costs, etc. they felt a larger pilot was premature
This is paper intensive
E-certification could save a lot of money over the long term
Bernie
Magnan, Vancouver Board of Trade:
it is the planning “must haves” that are the most important in
Information Technology – 80% of success is based on 20% of planning.
Suggest the minimum requirements for IT, etc.
Border Issues
Beyond the
Border Working Group, Regulatory Cooperation Council Update
Denis
Stevens, Consul General, Consulate General of Canada, Seattle:
This organization and region have played a
leadership role at the border with enhanced licenses, etc. Have a
particular opportunity with Beyond the Border
It is no accident that ambassador Doer spent a
significant amount of time here, and the Prime minister`s senior
negotiator will be here tomorrow
Pilots would be really helpful
This is unlike Security and Prosperity
Partnership (SPP) because it started with the Prime Minister and the
President
It is structured to avoid silos, with senior
people at the centre and not in departments
Canada will have less legislative problems with a
majority government, but in any event much of this does not need
legislation
Late September timeline
I see pretty limited awareness of this initiative
on the US side
The election in Canada slowed us down, and the US
election period will start soon, so there is a relatively small window of
opportunity in the fall
a lot of these things aren’t new, but what we
hope is new is that this time we get it done
A number of these ideas were raised in the regions, and are
natural steps
Sigrid
Emrich, United States Deputy Consul General, Vancouver, BC:
I worked on SPP, and this is different because
that did not have enough public consultations, and this is an ongoing
process, and people should hold us accountable and keep us on the right
track
SPP had no leaders’
vision – this does
SPP was trilateral with Mexico, and this is not
(better to go bilateral, and trilateralize when possible)
SPP was seen as too secret, so it is important to
be transparent
If possible, present solutions rather than just
raising issues
Identify problems early on
Be aware of protectionist interests on both sides
Budgetary issues exist in both countries
A lot of background work has been done
See the border as the last line, not the first
Additional
Perspectives from the U.S. and Canada
Alan
Langford, Director, Department of Homeland Security-Canada Initiated
Planning and Coordination, Washington DC:
Looking at perimeter: if something is bad for the
US, it is bad for Canada
This is a good plan, but it is a cultural shift
It doesn’t feel like any big differences
Limited awareness on the US side- so many things
going on
We will promise a lot of things – hold us
accountable
Security and facilitation are not in opposition –
they can complement each other
Two big challenges - both countries have to move
farther than they have before – Canada on the information side, and the US
on the facilitation side
This has to be seen as a bargain—Canadians get facilitation,
Americans get information
Denis
Stevens, Consul General, Consulate General of Canada, Seattle:
recent events have convinced both Canadian and
American officials that we can move forward. Work around the
Vancouver Olympics helped demonstrate that we were reliable partners, etc.
A US official told him need to reinstate the Shiprider program,
which had been a pilot
Bruce Agnew, Policy
Director, Cascadia Centre for Regional Development:
we should empower regional officers
Budget issues seem to drive policies related to cross-training,
deputization, etc.
Empower port directors to be flexible and respond to
differences along the border
Don Alper, Western
Washington University:
there seems to be movement in this area
Alan
Langford, Director, Department of Homeland Security-Canada Initiated
Planning and Coordination, Washington DC
Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETs) is
good, but only goes so far
We still have to work with the RCMP on
communications, etc.
This plan will help us save money over the long run, through
coordination, perhaps shared infrastructure, etc.
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons:
Perimeter security is about how we stop a threat
to North America before it lands
We fight together in Afghanistan, etc.
We are as much at risk as the US is
The opportunity we have here is golden
The Prime Minister and the President were clear
in February
The challenge on the Canadian side is political.
“Sovereignty” will be an issue, and the official opposition will be
opposed
Whoever communicates best will win
In the US this has to get through the House – the
natural reflex is to oppose it
Just because this makes sense does not mean it
will automatically work
Try to anticipate problems and address them
There is an art to politics – politics is about
building consensus
PNWER should use its political capital to support
this
These things won’t happen by accident
Talk to your representatives in Washington
Do your homework
The government in Ottawa will face a lot of
challenges, but will win given the results of the last election
Why hasn’t this happened before now?
9/11 changed America
Many believe the 9/11 terrorists came from Canada
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff made
exaggerated statements about terrorists from Canada, etc.
Trade is now trumping the security phobias to
some degree
it only makes sense to do a perimeter if the
border security is relaxed
if we do this right it will save money
Don Alper,
Western Washington University:
Harper/Obama announcement talked about
“perimeter” in terms of cooperation, partnership and integration rather
than geographically
“Perimeter” is a concept for any changes that
make the border crossing experience less onerous and more efficient
Political consideration for Canada is to avoid a
“belt and suspenders” system where we agree to a perimeter
(suspenders) but still have a thick border (belt)
The US still sees security at the border
as vital
Some ideas include:
ØMore shared facilities
ØA “Leisure lane” for Canadian or American
citizens with nothing to declare
ØIncreased radio frequency identification (RFID)
technology
ØIntegrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETs) are
effective, but lack a core constituency to support and expand
ØInstitute the Shiprider program on land
Other changes:
ØOne stop screening
ØHarmonize food and animal health standards
ØLook again beyond NAFTA at moving professionals
ØSimplify adjudication of past Driving Under the
Influence (DUI) cases
ØBring privacy officials together to hammer out a
North American “Privacy Convention” (not a law)
PNWER Suggested
Regional Pilots
List from this morning:
Common visa?
Agriculture-alternatives to long-term
e-certification pilot
Customs
Single customs window
Technologies for traveller processing
Reciprocal acceptance of United States-Canada
security clearance to allow commercial vehicle access to cruise ship
facilities
Formally reconstitute the border solutions council
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
proposed to reconstitute the Border Solutions Council, with
subcommittees, etc.
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons:
the single customs window would be the most valuable, but an
American replied that this would be difficult to do as a regional pilot,
since this is global
Don Alper, Western
Washington University:
commented that, while important, these were too small
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons:
agreed that these could be pieces, but argued that maybe we
should aim a bit higher
Bruce Agnew, Policy
Director, Cascadia Centre for Regional Development:
this region is the nexus of Asia Pacific and NAFTA. We are the
laboratory for perimeter
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
ask the tough questions
Don Alper, Western
Washington University:
suggested taking a two-track approach, with both the big
picture and specific smaller suggestions
Denis Stevens
Consul General, Consulate General of Canada, Seattle:
it is important to demonstrate momentum
It is a “vision” and a big step forward, but must be an ongoing
process
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons:
the vision is to do more on the perimeter and less at the
border
Alan
Langford, Director, Department of Homeland Security-Canada Initiated
Planning and Coordination, Washington DC:
the most important thing PNWER could do is hold us to account –
report back on how it is working here
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
proposed a perimeter security task force
Bruce Agnew,
Policy Director, Cascadia Centre for Regional Development:
repeated the need to focus on preclearance and cross-training
Don Alper, Western
Washington University
Go back to Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBETS)
Both sides want security, so focus on security. It is
not the line that matters, it is the security of both countries that
matters
Honourable
Rob Merrifield, Canadian House of Commons:
·stated that the border is secure enough. We can
increase security at the perimeter and therefore focus on economics at the
border
The Prime Minister is serious about this, and will probably
compromise if the efficiencies are a reality
Matt
Morrison, PNWER:
PNWER would like to do a conference in Washington, D.C. at the
time of the release of the Action Plan. It could also do a regional launch
of the plan, here in a region where it is supported.
Don Alper, Western
Washington University
reminded others that we are in a vacuum here - nothing concrete
has happened yet
Ron Cannan, Canadian
House of Commons:
stated that the House of Commons Standing Committee on
International Trade will visit Washington and will discuss this issue
Senator
Wilfrid Moore, Senate of Canada:
communications will be key. He recommended
sending information to all PNWER members, etc.
We have the chance to do this right
The US northern border is not the same as
the southern border, and that message must get out
Remember Tip O’Neil -- “All
politics is local,” -- and get the message out
It is about jobs and the economy
Keynote
Breakfast
James
Billmaier, Author of Jolt! The Impending Dominance of the Electric Car and
Why America Must Take Charge:
Electric cars are not new; 6,800 such cars were
sold in 1912
Electric cars are inevitable, given concerns
about global warming, concerns about a lack of new oil discoveries and
national security; the cost of defending pipelines, etc. increases the
cost of gas
By subsidizing gas, governments subsidize internal
combustion vehicles
Because the demand for electricity goes down at
night, with electric cards charged at night, a greater number of electric
vehicles can be used
Electric cars use about as much electricity as a
refrigerator, so they have little impact on the electric grid
Electric motors are efficient, so even if oil is
used to generate the electricity, there are savings
It is less expensive to buy and operate electric
vehicles than to buy and operate conventional ones
Electric cars will have a range of 300 miles by
2020; Volkswagen says the range will be 500 miles
All companies have their best teams working on
designing electric vehicles
Venture capitalist John Doer says the market for
electric vehicles is – “the mother of all markets” – between six and sixty
times bigger than computers and the internet put together
This is a key moment in history – a “Sputnik
moment,” and China is really focused on developing batteries and other
technology for electric vehicles
There are many myths about electric cars
For a single-car family, a plug-in hybrid car is good; gas can
be used for long trips
Keynote
Luncheon
Francisco
Sanchez, US Department of Commerce:
PNWER is an ally in promoting cross-border
regional cooperation
President Obama said that Canada and the United
States are “woven together”; the two countries are friends and partners
that share a border
Last year, the value of US exports to Ontario
exceeded the value of US trade with Russia, India and Brazil combined
The US recovery is still fragile
In the 2010 State of the Union Address, the US
President pledged to double exports by the end of 2014
In 2010, the value of US exports was 17% greater
than in 2009
President Obama and Prime Minister Harper agreed
to work on border security and regulatory reform
On the issue of regulatory reform, the Regulatory
Cooperation Council (RCC) has a two-year mandate, and is focussed on
cutting red tape, giving early notice of regulations, etc.
The shared border vision for the Canada-US border
has four pillars, including trade facilitation
Everyone is looking for an advantage, and Canada
and the United States should take advantage of the edge that the two
countries already have in terms of shared values, etc.
The United States needs comprehensive immigration
reform
The US federal debt ceiling issue has “sucked all
the oxygen” out of Washington
Since Canada and the United States will always have a few
problems, there is a need to improve dispute resolution
Simon Kennedy,
Industry Canada:
The February 2011 Shared Vision for Perimeter
Security and Economic Prosperity outlined a joint security agenda and
economic concerns
In addition to a broad vision, the February 2011
vision established two working groups, and an action plan is forthcoming
The February 2011 vision had four pillars:
Øaddressing threats early
Øfacilitating trade
ØIntegrating cross-border law enforcement
ØAddressing critical infrastructure and
cybersecurity
The February 2011 vision is about improving the
way operations occur at the border and pushing the border out
The February 2011 vision contains high-impact
deliverables, measurable outcomes and targets
The goal is to have an action plan in relation to
the February 2011 vision in place by the end of the summer of 2011; it is expected
that the action plan will be “the end of the beginning,” and will set
priorities, etc.; the development of the initiatives will be another whole
process, with consultations, etc. that will take 3-5 years
This instance is the fourth occasion on which the
border has been “discussed” in the last 20 years:
Ø1996-1997
Ø2001
ØSecurity and Prosperity Partnership
Ønow
Some problems are not best treated in border discussions, such
as labour market policies, etc.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis Johnson, Senator,
Co-Chair,
Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group