FIPA held its 21st Executive Committee meeting in
Panama City, Panama on January 29-30, 2010, at the Taboga Hall of the Sheraton
Hotel Panama. The meeting was hosted by Panamanian Deputy Víctor Juliao III,
Representative of Central America to the Executive Committee, and chaired by
FIPA President Luiz Carlos Hauly, Member of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.
Seven other members of the Executive Committee attended: James Bezan, MP
(Canada, representative of North America), Stanford Callender, MP (Trinidad and
Tobago, representative of the Caribbean), Deputy María Estela de la Cruz
(Dominican Republic, representative of Central America), Senator Adriana
González Carrillo (Mexico, representative of the host country of the 7th
Plenary Meeting), Senator Alberto Grillón Conigliaro (Paraguay, representative
of South America), Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette (Canada, past President of
FIPA) and Linda Machuca, Member of the National Assembly of Ecuador (President
of the Group of Women Parliamentarians of the Americas). Dominican Deputy
Gladys Sofía Azcona, Parliamentary Centre representatives Amelita Armit and
John Wood and representative of the Inter-American Parliamentary Group on
Population and Development Norma García de Paredes participated as guests.
(See Appendix A for a list of participants)
The main objectives of the meeting were to discuss
the 2010 work plan – which included preparations for the 7th Plenary Meeting, a
regional trade workshop, a meeting of the Group of Women Parliamentarians and
initial activities of the new project financed by the Canadian International
Development agency (CIDA) – and to address administrative matters. In response
to the January 12 earthquake in Haiti, members also discussed and adopted a
resolution of solidarity towards that country.
2.Opening of the Meeting
Deputy Víctor Juliao III extended welcoming
remarks on behalf of José Luis Varela Rodríguez, President of the National
Assembly. He then referred to the tragic events occurred in Haiti on January
12, and invited participants to observe a minute a silence in memory of the
victims of the earthquake.
FIPA President Luiz Carlos Hauly, as Chair of the
Executive Committee, was then invited to take the floor. He thanked Mr. Juliao
for facilitating the organization of the 21st Meeting of the FIPA Executive
Committee. He recalled the Forum’s mandate and presented a summary of themes
addressed by FIPA since its creation. He then introduced participating
Executive Committee members and guests and, in doing so, noted the difficulties
faced in having an official Unites Stated representative appointed to the FIPA
Executive Committee.
3.Adoption of the Agenda
President Hauly invited members to review the
draft agenda of the 21st Executive Committee Meeting. He proposed the inclusion
of a new item to discuss the situation in Haiti.
Delegates took the floor in turn to express their
solidarity with Haiti and talk about their respective country’s response to the
disaster. The outstanding efforts made by the Dominican Republic in support of
their neighbouring country were particularly praised.
Meeting host Víctor Juliao introduced a draft
resolution through which the FIPA Executive Committee expresses solidarity with
Haiti in light of the disaster caused by the earthquake. He explained that the
aim of the resolution was to promote the idea of emergency preparedness and
seek for an exchange of experiences in terms of emergency relief efforts.
The agenda was adopted with the proposed addition.
The Chair asked members to submit their suggestions regarding the draft
resolution in writing so that these could be included in a revised version to
be considered the following day.
4.Approval of the Report of the 20th Executive
Committee Meeting
The meeting proceeded with the consideration of
the report of the 20th FIPA Executive Committee meeting, which was approved
without any change.
5.Report on Recent Activities
Canadian representative James Bezan was invited to
speak about the signature of a contribution agreement between CIDA, FIPA and
the Parliamentary Centre of Canada for the implementation of the Project
“Strengthening the Role of Parliaments in Democratic Governance and Sustainable
Development in the Americas”.
The floor was then given to Parliamentary Centre
President Amelita Armit, who described this as a significant and timely
agreement, which would enable the Parliamentary Centre to support FIPA in many
areas, including the development of training programs and the elaboration of a
strategy to achieve financial sustainability.
Ms. Armit followed her address with a presentation
of a revised version of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) defining the
relationship between FIPA and the Parliamentary Centre. She explained that the
range of services to be provided to FIPA by the Parliamentary Centre would be
expanded through this new MOU, to include not only Technical Secretariat
services and administrative support but also expertise in parliamentary
capacity-building and development.
Following the presentation, members were invited
to consider this new MOU. The representative of Canada raised concerns about
the fact that the MOU provides for a fix overhead percentage to be charged by
the Parliamentary Centre to FIPA on top of direct labour costs and expressed
his view that a breakdown of actual indirect expenses incurred by the Centre
would be preferable. Ms. Armit indicated that the Centre would provide such a
breakdown and that the overhead could be reconsidered in financial year
2010-2011 with this information in hand.
Upon a motion by the Canadian Representative the
Memorandum of Understanding was approved by the Executive Committee.
The Parliamentary Centre was congratulated on
efforts made to achieve an agreement with CIDA.
Finally, the President informed the Executive
Committee that a new program officer in charge of communications and a program
assistant had been hired at the FIPA Technical Secretariat in replacement of
outgoing staff. Upon a proposal by past FIPA President Céline Hervieux-Payette
a motion was moved to thank former FIPA staff Mateo Barney, Cora Capurro and
Sabra Ripley for their contribution to FIPA and to welcome new staff.
6.2010 FIPA Work Plan
6.1 Preparations
for the 7th Plenary Meeting
Mexican Senator Adriana González Carrillo was
given the floor to speak about preparations for the 7th Plenary Meeting. The
Senator reiterated her Congress’ satisfaction to be hosting the FIPA Plenary
meeting on the bicentennial of its independence and centennial of the Mexican
revolution and invited members to identify tentative dates for the event.
After discussion, delegates agreed to hold the 7th
Plenary Meeting on November 17-21, 2010.
The Chair then invited delegates to share ideas
regarding the event’s agenda and, in particular, regarding themes to be
addressed by working groups. After an exchange of ideas the following themes
were agreed upon:
§Emergency
preparedness, disaster relief and infrastructures;
§Regional
security and transnational crime;
§The
role of civil society in democracy strengthening.
Executive Committee members also agreed on the importance
to pursue the work of FIPA in the areas of migrations and human rights and food
security, possibly through capacity-building activities.
The representative of Ecuador asked that the
agenda of the Plenary Meeting be kept open to a certain extent in order to take
into account major issues which may arise in the course of the year. She
proposed that an analysis be prepared and presented on each substantive topic
in order to stress their strategic nature. Members of the Executive Committee
concurred.
It was also proposed to open a space for a
discussion with other parliamentary institutions, although members agreed that
the meeting should focus on themes of interest to Parliaments of the Americas.
Finally, following-up on the decision made at the
last meeting of Executive Committee, members agreed on the fee to be charged to
observer delegations, fixed at US$ 1,000/delegate up to a maximum of 5
delegates. In addition, members concurred that there should be an annual
regular fee for observers, equivalent to the lower fee paid by FIPA members.
6.2 2010
Regional Trade Workshop
Upon the proposal of the host country, it was
agreed to postpone the date of the trade workshop from March 11-13 to May
19-22, 2010.
6.3 FIPA
Capacity-Building Program and Presentation of a Methodology to Assess the Needs
and Interests of FIPA Member Parliaments
Parliamentary Centre’s senior adviser in
parliamentary development John Wood was invited to present a methodology for
the design of a capacity-building program to be developed in the framework of
the new CIDA-financed project.
Mr. Wood presented key elements of the
methodology, described in a document distributed to participants. He noted that
the evaluation would be made through interviews – administered during visits to
select Parliaments in each sub-region of the hemisphere –and questionnaires. He
also expressed his interest in discussing with each member individually in
order to obtain their input on such methodology.
The proposed methodology was approved by the
Executive Committee, who noted the importance of having professional
development opportunities for legislators and assured the Parliamentary Centre
representative of their support. The Panamanian representative said that his
National Assembly would provide support to the Parliamentary Centre in the
coordination of interviews with parliamentarians and staff of his National
Assembly. Paraguayan Executive Committee Alberto Grillón was appointed to be
the official liaison between the Parliamentary Centre and the Executive Committee
on the capacity-building program.
6.4 Group
of Women Parliamentarians of the Americas
Ecuadorian Representative Linda Machuca, President
of the Group of Women Parliamentarians of the Americas, distributed a proposal
for the next Women’s Group meeting, which, reiterating the offer made by the
President of the Ecuadorian Assembly, she proposed be held in her country.
She submitted tentative dates for the event (July
6-8, 2010) and invited Executive Committee members to express their preferences
with regards to priority issues to be addressed at that meeting.
Proposed dates were approved. Participants noted
that the situation of indigenous women and of women living in rural areas
deserved particular attention as they are the ones who suffer the most difficult
living conditions and are often not aware of their rights. The Dominican
representative emphasized the importance of working at the local level, for
example by having gender departments in local administrations.
Other proposals included harmonization between
human rights international treaties and national legislation, the application
of quota legislation and economic issues.
Ms. Machuca took note of these ideas and committed
to extend the consultation to the Women’s Group network. She also took note of
the recommendation to have NGO representation at the meeting, while
emphasizing, at the same time, the importance of having a well known keynote
speaker in order to raise the profile of the event.
Before closing the discussion, President Hauly
indicated that the CIDA project budget included funds to contract a specialist
to support the Group of Women Parliamentarians of the Americas. Members agreed
that FIPA should proceed with the contracting.
6.5 Follow-Up
to 6th Plenary Meeting Recommendations
Participants were invited to look at a summary
list of recommendations made at the 6th Plenary Meeting of FIPA and to consider
means to follow-up on these recommendations. In the absence of comments, the
Chair asked members to send their suggestions in writing to the FIPA Technical
Secretariat.
6.6 Relations
with Inter-American Institutions and Summit of the Americas’ Process
The Chair recalled the decision made the previous
year to have a general cooperation agreement between FIPA and the General
Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS), but indicated that
such project had not materialized yet. He asked the FIPA Technical Secretariat
to follow-up on this matter with the OAS General Secretariat
He suggested that the two organizations consider,
in particular, the idea of holding a joint meeting of speakers and presidents
of parliamentary chambers of the Americas – possibly as part of the process
leading to the next Summit of the Americas in Colombia.
He then invited participants to review the list of
inter-American activities available in their binders, in order for them to
decide whether FIPA should seek participation in some of them.
Members expressed their interest in forming a
parliamentary delegation to observe the 40th Regular Session of the OAS General
Assembly in Lima, Peru, June 6-8, 2010.
The Canadian representative noted that the
Inter-American Development Bank would hold its 2011 annual meeting in Calgary,
Canada.
6.7 Relations
with the Parliamentary Confederation of the Americas (COPA)
The Chair reported on the lack of progress made in
discussions between FIPA and COPA on the possible integration of the two
organizations since the first meeting of the joint FIPA-COPA working group
created in 2007.
After an exchange of views on relations between
FIPA and COPA, members decided to maintain the status-quo for the moment while
continuing to seek insight into how parliaments in the Americas view the future
of the hemispheric parliamentary organizations.
6.8 Revision
of the Communications’ Strategy
The Chair indicated that a review of FIPA’s
communication strategy – last updated in 2005 – would be undertaken by the FIPA
Technical Secretariat, and invited members to share ideas in this regard with
the FIPA communications officer.
A preliminary exchange of ideas took place,
focussing primarily on the FIPA website. Members suggested to use the site the
FIPA website, on the one hand as an information tool (for example by including
a bank of legislation and best practices on different subject matters, updated
links to member parliaments and blogs of parliamentarians) and on the other as
a means to promote coordination among parliamentarians and exercise influence
(for example by promoting good practices and inspiring experiences). It was
also noted that the website should be attractive to target groups, such as the
youth.
Other concrete proposals included:
§To
revamp the Virtual Parliament and consider the use of social networks such as
Facebook or others, for the exchange of information, especially for the Women’s
Group;
§To
design new promotional material, such as a FIPA flag, pamphlets and posters;
§To
promote staff exchanges between FIPA members parliaments as a means to share
practices.
The communications officer took note of these
ideas and indicated that she would contact individual members to pursue the
review exercise.
7.Presentation by the Inter-American Parliamentary
Group on Population and Development
A special presentation was made by the
Inter-American Parliamentary Group, represented by Program Coordinator Norma
García de Paredes. Ms. García explained the mandate of the IAPG and its work on
issues such as sexual and reproductive health in relation to the United Nations
development agenda. She spoke about the Group’s structure and its current projects,
which include the development of comparative legislation on HIV-AIDS. She
requested support from the Executive Committee to consolidate the Group’s
presence in countries where it doesn’t have representation.
Following a question and answer period, Ms. García
was thanked for her presentation.
8.Administrative and Financial Matters
8.1 Special
Meeting of the Board of Directors of the FIPA Corporation
FIPA President Luiz Carlos Hauly invited the
President of the FIPA Corporation, Canadian Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette, to
take the floor to chair the Special Meeting of the FIPA Corporation Board of
Directors. Among other items, directors approved the financial statement of the
FIPA for the year ended on September 30, 2009.
8.2 Annual
General Meeting of Executive Committee Members of the FIPA Corporation
The President of the FIPA Corporation called the
annual meeting of Executive Committee members of the FIPA Corporation, during
which Executive Committee members received the auditors’ report on the financial
statement for the year ended on September 30, 2009 and elected the Board of
Directors of the Corporation. Canadian Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette was
re-elected as President of the FIPA Corporation. Auditors for the financial
year ending on September 30, 2010 were appointed.
8.3 Annual
Meeting of the Board of Directors of the FIPA Corporation
The FIPA Corporation President then called a
meeting of the new Board of Directors of the Corporation. Officers of the
Corporation were appointed. The remuneration of auditors for the year ending on
September 30, 2010 was set. Director James Bezan, from Canada, was appointed to
represent FIPA on the steering committee of the new CIDA-financed project.
Finally, the FIPA budget for year October 1, 2009-September 30, 2010 was
adopted with minor amendments.
8.4 Review
of the Financial Strategy of FIPA
The Chair passed the floor to the FIPA Executive
Secretary, who explained the rationale behind the proposed review of FIPA’s
financial strategy. The Executive Secretary noted, in particular, that making
FIPA self-sustainable was one of the objectives of the new CIDA-funded project
and that this would require an examination of the membership fees system, the
cost-efficiency of the current Technical Secretariat structure and the
diversification of FIPA’s funding. A document outlining the amount of funds
collected from member parliaments annually since the introduction of the
regular membership fees’ system in 2004 was distributed to members for their
information.
After an examination of the data provided, the
Chair concluded that FIPA basically had to triple its current revenue from
membership fees in order to achieve self-sustainability. He added, referring to
the Brazilian experience, that the payment of contribution was often tied to
the existence of FIPA chapters in member parliaments, hence the need to work on
passing resolutions to create such structures in each member country. The
Canadian delegates echoed this view, explaining the system put in place in the
Parliament of Canada for the allocation of funds to parliamentary associations.
The Dominican representative requested the support of the Executive Committee
and Secretariat in reaching out to her country’s Senate authorities in order to
facilitate a possible increase of the Dominican contribution.
Members agreed to proceed with the review of the
financial strategy. Parliamentary Centre President Amelita Armit reiterated the
Parliamentary Centre’s commitment, under the new project, to assist FIPA in the
development of that strategy.
9.Other Business
9.1 Date
and Location of the 22nd FIPA Executive Committee Meeting
The representative of Paraguay, Senator Alberto
Grillón Conigliaro, offered to host the next FIPA Executive Committee Member in
Asunción, Paraguay.
Members accepted the offer and, after discussion,
decided to hold the meeting on June 4-5, before the OAS General Assembly
(scheduled June 6-8 in Lima, Peru) in order to enable a delegation of Executive
Committee members to attend the Assembly.
9.2 Resolution
on Haiti
Taking into account suggestions made at the
beginning of the meeting, a final text of the draft resolution “In which the
FIPA Executive Committee expresses its solidarity with Haiti in light of the
disaster caused by the earthquake” was submitted to Executive Committee members
on January 30. It was adopted unanimously.
(See Appendix B for Resolution FIPA/EC/2010/RES.1
“In which the FIPA Executive Committee expresses its solidarity with Haiti in
light of the disaster caused by the earthquake)
10.Closing
No other issue having been raised, the Chair
declared the 21st FIPA Executive Committee Meeting closed.
Respectfully submitted,
Mr. Randy Hoback, M.P.
Chair
Canadian Section of ParlAmericas