From May 2-4, 2010, Mr. Phil McColeman,
M.P. and Mr. Claude Bachand, M.P. represented the
Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) at the spring meeting of
the Canadian/American Border Trade Alliance. The delegation was accompanied by
June Dewetering and John Christopher, Analysts to the IPG.
THE EVENT
The Can/Am Border Trade Alliance (BTA)
holds two meetings each year: in the spring in Ottawa and in the fall in
Washington, D.C. The BTA is a coalition of businesses, public-sector
organizations and individuals with an interest in bilateral trade and tourism.
Its mission is to maximize commercial activity and ensure continued growth in
cross-border trade as well as efficient and productive border-crossing capabilities.
During the meeting, sessions were held
on such topics as:
·Strategic Direction of Canada/US Cooperation for
a Smart Border for the 21st Century and Beyond
·View from the Bridges
·Detroit River International Crossing
·Canada/US Relations and Parliamentary
Cooperation Activities
·The American Perspective
·View from Trucking
·View from Trade of e-MANIFEST ACI
·Overview and Issues Canada/US Trade Relations,
including “Buy American”
·Strategic Direction of Transport Policy:
National Highway, Rail, Air, Maritime Infrastructure: Specifics on Gateways,
Trade Corridors and Border Crossings
·Quebec/New York Relations: Summit Success,
Economic Impact, Corridor Status.
Attendees at the event included
private-sector representatives involved in a number of tourism, transportation
and trade-related activities as well as representatives of a variety of US and
Canadian federal departments and the US Embassy in Ottawa.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
The IPG has a long association with the
BTA, and typically attends both the BTA’s fall and spring meetings. Given the
BTA’s focus, attendance at the meetings provides IPG members with an important
opportunity to gain insight about problems being experienced by businesses and
individuals in respect of trade and tourism as well as about efforts and
actions by governments in both countries to address these problems.
In particular, the IPG’s
Co-Chairs, Senator Janis Johnson and Mr. Gord Brown, M.P., had
the opportunity to tell meeting participants about the IPG’s activities since
the BTA’s 2009 fall meeting and to indicate the nature and scope of the Group’s
summer activities, including the 51st Annual Meeting and meetings
with US governors and state legislators. Other members of the Canadian Section
of the IPG spoke with meeting participants, including His Excellency David
Jacobson, US Ambassador to Canada.
At this meeting, as at other BTA
meetings, IPG participants benefit from the opportunity to interact with, and
learn from, private- and public-sector organizations and individuals that deal
with border issues on a daily basis. Attendance at the BTA meetings also
provides IPG members with an opportunity to inform others about the range of
actions taken by the IPG in respect of shared bilateral goals as well as
differences, especially through the invitation that is typically given to the
Co-Chairs to make remarks about the Group’s activities and priorities.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
As noted earlier, a variety of sessions
were held. As well, US Ambassador His Excellency David Jacobson hosted a
reception at the home. At the meeting and the reception, members of the
Canadian Section of the IPG were able to speak with attendees about the problems
being encountered at Canada’s shared border with the US and to share with them
the efforts being taken by members of the Canadian Section of the IPG to ensure
the existence of an efficient, cost-effective and secure common border.
This report summarizes selected
discussions at the meeting, including the remarks made by the IPG Co-Chairs.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION OF CANADA/US
COOPERATION FOR A SMART BORDER FOR THE 21ST CENTURY AND BEYOND
Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., M.P., Minister
of Public Safety
·Canada and the United States share the largest
and closest two-way trade relationship in the world, and cross-border trade is
critical to the prosperity of both countries
·the common border between Canada and the US
should be secure against threats yet open to the movement of legitimate goods,
services and people
·Canada and the US should adopt a risk-management
approach in assuring the physical safety and security of citizens as well as to
protect their economic well-being
·there are a number of areas and ways in which
Canada and the US cooperate, including in respect of the shared border,
aviation security, terrorism and integrated border enforcement teams
·long wait times at the shared border are never
acceptable, and operational improvements are needed at the ports of entry; a
commitment to service standards should occur
·ideally, Canada and the United States should
work together in order to identify and intercept threats before arrival at our
borders, and security should be focused on our perimeter rather than the 49th
parallel; a threat to either country is as well a threat to the other country
·trusted traveller and shipper programs should be
expanded
·pre-clearance makes sense from the perspective
of both security and efficiency
·since paperwork takes time and time is money, a
reduced paper burden is a Canadian federal priority
·the use of biometrics can enhance passenger
processing
·Canada and the US should create and implement a
vision for the long term while continuing to focus as well on the short and
medium term
·everything that happens at the border should be
consistent with the goal of accelerating legitimate cross-border trade and
travel
VIEW
FROM THE BRIDGES
Lew
Holloway, Niagara Falls Bridge Commission
Stan
Korosec, Blue Water Bridge
Ron Rienas, Peace Bridge
Rik Saaltink, Seaway Bridge
·many of the bridges at the shared border between
Canada and the US are being upgraded or renovated, or are awaiting funding
approval or agreement prior to changes being made
·changes at the bridges have included deck
replacement, painting, construction of new bridge plazas, increases in the
number of lanes, bridge widening, the construction of high-low booths, etc.
·adequate infrastructure is meaningless without
adequate staffing; staffing is a particular concern on the Canadian side of the
common border
·while Canada has done a good job in improving
its ports of entry, there is insufficient radio frequency identification (RFID)
technology, which limits the benefits of the NEXUS, Free and Secure Trade
(FAST) and enhanced driver’s licence measures
·NEXUS and FAST are useful in reducing border
delays as well as increasing safety and efficiency, but the governments have
done a bad job in marketing those programs; consequently, the private sector is
spending tens of thousands of dollars on marketing
·a number of the largest bilateral border
crossings have no US funds committed for improvements
·there are operational concerns in relation to
Canada Border Services Agency operations, including in respect of elimination
of the student program, inadequate staffing of primary inspection lanes, weak
supervision, a lack of RFID-enabled inspection booths in Canada, insufficient
NEXUS services, etc.
·traveller declaration cards should be eliminated
for NEXUS users
·automobile traffic affects commercial traffic if
automobiles face long wait times
·Canada and the US have completely different
funding models
·tolls must not be a disincentive to travel
·security requirements implemented since the
terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 have resulted in a doubling of the time
required for processing
CANADA/US RELATIONS AND
PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION ACTIVITIES
Gord Brown, M.P., Co-Chair,
Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group
·since September 2009, the Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) has been actively delivering the Canadian
message to federal and state legislators, as well as to governors
·in October 2009, a member of the IPG attended a
meeting of western state legislators where he spoke with participants about the
bilateral trade relationship, the importance of a smoothly functioning and
secure shared border, and the energy relationship that is important for both
countries; each year, this meeting holds a North American Summit, and in
October the summit focused on strengthening regional security and economic
competitiveness
·also in October 2009, members of the IPG
attended the Leadership Forum and Legislative Academy of the Pacific NorthWest
Economic Region, which includes five US states, three Canadian provinces and
two Canadian territories; at the meeting, economic recovery, energy, and border
issues and trade policy were among the topics discussed
·in November 2009, the IPG attended the annual
meeting of the Council of State Governments, which represents state
legislators from all 50 states; two governors – West Virginia Governor Joe
Manchin and South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds – attended the event
·IPG efforts continued in February 2010, when
members attended the meeting of the National Governors Association (NGA) in
Washington, D.C. and spoke to governors about issues of Canadian and/or joint
interest, including the “Buy American” provisions in the US stimulus package
and other measures, border crossings and a variety of trade issues; for the
first time, and in recognition of the fact that our nations share a dynamic and
expanding relationship with integrated industries, North American supply
chains, a shared border, and common security and prosperity priorities,
Canadian premiers participated with governors in a special session to discuss
issues of common concern, such as the border as well as energy and
environmental challenges
·following the NGA meeting, members conducted a
two-day Congressional visit; IPG members met with more than 15 US Senators and
about 35 members of the House of Representatives and/or their staff
·IPG members told members of Congress that trade,
which benefits both countries, is facilitated by a smoothly functioning,
seamless shared border, and that our countries should work together to lower
barriers, reduce costs and eliminate unnecessary requirements at the border;
members also indicated that while Canada too is concerned about security, it is
not always clear that the new security measures are resulting in increased
safety
·Congressional visits enable IPG members to reach
out to a large number of US federal legislators in a very short period of time
for concentrated one-on-one meetings; particular efforts are made to meet with
members of the US Senate and the US House of Representatives who do not attend
the IPG’s annual meeting, and thereby to inform them about – and gain their
support on – critical issues affecting both countries
·since the meetings with US federal legislators
are designed to be “off the record,” the report on Congressional visits that
are tabled in Parliament summarize the general nature of the issues that were
raised by Canadian and American legislators
Senator Janis Johnson, Co-Chair,
Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group
·the summer activities of the Canada-United
States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) will begin in May 2010 when about 20
Canadian Parliamentarians will participate in the IPG’s 51st Annual
Meeting in Louisiana for very comprehensive and solution-oriented debates with
their American counterparts
·at the IPG’s annual meeting, members of the
Canadian and US delegations will be split into three committees, where a
variety of bilateral and multilateral issues will be discussed; Committee One
will be focused on North American financial and trade issues, including the
shared border as well as trade irritants and trade agreements, Committee Two
will be focused on bilateral cooperation on such international issues as
Afghanistan, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, nuclear non-proliferation
and human rights, and Committee Three will be focused on energy, environmental
issues and water
·throughout the summer, members of the IPG will
be travelling to various locations in Canada and the United States as we meet
with state legislators and governors as well as with US private-sector business
interests
·as IPG participation at regional and national
meetings of governors and state legislators continues, we will be focused on
delivering the Canadian message about such topics as the need to work together
in the development of a North American energy strategy that includes
responsible use of traditional energy sources and the promotion of renewable
energy, Canada’s continued role as a secure and reliable supplier of energy to
the US notwithstanding American efforts to avoid “foreign” oil, the requirement
for a secure and efficient common border with the United States that is jointly
managed, and the need to ensure that actions in both countries support the
integrated industries and North American supply chains that contribute to
prosperity for businesses and – by extension – both nations
·members of the IPG will be doing what they can
to ensure that supportive and positive actions are taken; Canadian presence at
the meetings of governors and state legislators are an ongoing and visible
reminder that “we are in this together”
VIEW FROM TRUCKING
David Bradley, Canadian Trucking
Alliance
·trucking “hit bottom” in fall 2009; while truck
traffic is still 30% lower than it was at the beginning of the recession, it is
slowly coming back
·the lack of reliability and the high degree of
uncertainty at the border are significant concerns
·an integrated approach to security and trade at
the border is needed
VIEW FROM TRADE OF E-MANIFEST ACI
Michelle Bunbury, UPS-SCS
Allan Schepens, Canadian Pacific
Railway
Renate Jalbert, FEDEX Canada
·there have been challenges associated with
moving shippers from paper processes to electronic processes
·at times, there are problems associated with
getting correct information on the e-manifest
·the e-manifest for shippers should follow the
model used by airlines for gathering information electronically
·a realistic timeline for full implementation of
the e-manifest initiative is 12-18 months
OVERVIEW
AND ISSUES CANADA/US TRADE RELATIONS, INCLUDING “BUY AMERICAN”
Gerald
Keddy, M.P., Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade
·Canada and the United States have the largest
trading relationship in the world, as well as integrated supply chains, shared
history, personal relationships, etc.
·bilateral trade between Canada and the US is
responsible for more than 8 million US jobs
·the true test of a partnership comes not when
times are easy, but when times are tough; Canada and the US should never take
the bilateral partnership for granted
·the “Buy American” provisions in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 threatened integrated supply chains
and integrated economies; a Canadian exemption from these provisions has been
secured and work is under way on a more comprehensive bilateral procurement
agreement
·recently, it was announced that Canada’s
Minister of International Trade will hold a trade summit with the US Trade
Representative twice each year; it is hoped that the summits will help in
resolving trade challenges
·security concerns must be balanced with an
efficient border that functions well from the perspective of both countries
·enhanced driver’s licences are available in a
number of US states and Canadian provinces
·vehicle traffic is expected to double in the
next 30 years while truck traffic is expected to triple
·the three North American Free Trade Agreement
countries must work together in order to make the Agreement even more effective
than is currently the case
·a sophisticated trade relationship needs to go
beyond tariff reductions and elimination, and focus on non-tariff barriers to
trade
·the Canadian and American economies are
integrated to an astonishing degree, and any measure that brings business to
Canada will have positive spinoffs for the United States
·a free and open approach to trade is the single
best way to create opportunities and prosperity in the global economy
·the “spectre of protectionism” continues to
“raise its ugly head”
·Canada and the United States need to have a
serious dialogue about what poses threats and what does not; free and fair
trade is not a threat
STRATEGIC DIRECTION OF TRANSPORT
POLICY: NATIONAL HIGHWAY, RAIL, AIR, MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE: SPECIFICS ON
GATEWAYS, TRADE CORRIDORS AND BORDER CROSSINGS
Kristine Burr, Transport Canada
·Canada and the United States have a tremendous
trade relationship and a tremendously important economic relationship;
transportation exists in order to serve trade and commerce
·more than 75% of the trade between Canada and
the US goes through six border crossings
·global supply chains are increasingly important
in global relationships
·increasing globalization means increasingly
complex trade patterns, and a more global view of the transportation system is
needed
·transportation challenges currently exist in
such areas as congestion, reliability and infrastructure
·solutions to transportation challenges need to
focus on efficiency and competitiveness, and strategic investments and new
policy approaches are required
·with Canada’s gateways and trade corridor
initiatives, attempts are being made to improve the transportation of
nationally significant volumes of trade in specific regions
·infrastructure funding is less population-based
and more strategic and merit-based; some funding is allocated to areas where
bottlenecks exist, and targeted investments are sometimes made to leverage
funds allocated by partners
·rail transport is seen, in part, as a way to
alleviate road congestion; as well, it results in lower greenhouse gas
emissions for long-haul movements
·there are opportunities to increase the volume
of goods travelling to the US by rail
·like rail transport, marine transport is seen –
in part – as a way to alleviate road congestion; it too has relatively lower
greenhouse gas emissions
·for marine transport to be effective, there is a
need to strengthen inter-modalism
·at land crossings, stakeholders have border
efficiency concerns about capacity, document requirements, processing and wait
times, and NEXUS and Free and Secure Trade (FAST) enrolment
·in respect of marine transportation,
stakeholders have concerns about air emission regulations and certain ballast
water requirements
·Canada’s federal government recently offered to
loan up to $550 million in respect of the Detroit River International Crossing
·everyone should ensure that investments go as
far as possible
·for the future, key priorities will include:
consideration of future trade patterns; the efficiency of gateways, corridors
and border crossings; the use of innovative technology; a focus on
environmental responsibility; and partnerships
·the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is on a
journey, with much change accomplished and much left to do
·common Canadian and American interests regarding
national security and commercial facilitation must be brought together in
respect of the shared border
·we live in a world of increasingly complex risks
and threats, as well as intricate trade issues
·the CBSA has a longstanding role in protecting
the nation from external threats
·efforts must be directed toward reducing
business costs at the front line of border operations
·fiscal prudence will be needed going forward and
resources must be reallocated as priorities change
·resources must be allocated to areas where we
will get “the biggest bang for our buck” in respect of both border facilitation
and border enforcement
·the CBSA is talking to the US about a vision for
shared border management
·a long-range strategic framework is needed, and
risk-management tools must be a focus
·a focus on perimeter security provides
opportunities for collaboration
·four variables affect wait times at border
points: infrastructure, the number of inspection booths, the number of staff
and the time taken for processing
·in thinking about the common border, Canada and
the US require common evidence and a clear view of available data
·about 80% of crossings occur at about 20% of the ports of entry;
these ports “carry the burden” and should be the focus
Respectfully
submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group