From August 27-30, 2012, Mr. Gord Brown,
M.P., Co-Chair of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG), led
a delegation from the Canadian Section of the IPG to the Republican National
Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida. The other member of the delegation was the
Honourable Bob Runciman, Senator. The delegation, which was part of the
Republican Diplomatic Partnership (RDP), was accompanied by Ms. June
Dewetering, Senior Advisor to the Canadian Section.
THE EVENT
Three main activities occur at the RNC,
which is held every four years: the nomination of the Republican Party’s
presidential and vice-presidential candidates, the formulation and adoption of
the Republic Party’s platform, and the adoption of rules and procedures in
relation to party activities, including the nomination process for presidential
candidates in the next election cycle.
As noted earlier, the delegation from the
Canadian Section of the IPG participated at the RNC through the RDP. The RDP is
an independent, not-for-profit organization that fosters relationships between
U.S. policy leaders and government officials, the private sector and the
diplomatic corps. To facilitate mutual understanding and development, it
emphasizes the importance of the principles underlying republican government,
and promotes the exchange of conservative policy and political theory with the
global community. At the RNC in Tampa, Florida, about 90 embassies participated
through the RDP.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
Canada and the United States share a
mutually beneficial relationship. According to recent figures, an estimated 8
million American jobs depend on trade with Canada, and an estimated 2.5 million
Canadian jobs depend on trade with the United States. As well, in 2011,
bilateral trade was valued at more than $700 billion, which is more than $1.9
billion each day or $1.3 million each minute. Moreover, at present, 35 U.S.
states have Canada as their primary foreign export market.
The IPG aims to find points of convergence
in respective national policies, to initiate dialogue on points of divergence,
to encourage the exchange of information and to promote better understanding
among legislators on shared issues of concern. Members of the IPG’s Canadian
Section meet regularly with their federal counterparts and, in recent years,
have attended meetings of governors and state legislators. At these events,
Canadian delegates engage in conversations that help the Canadian Section to
achieve its objectives and that explain the nature and scope of the bilateral
relationship.
Members of the Canadian Section of the IPG
found the 2012 RNC to be a valuable opportunity to observe the U.S. political
process and to meet with some of the U.S. federal legislators who were attending
the convention. Feeling that members of the Canadian Section were able to
achieve their objectives for the event, the Canadian Section intends to attend
future RNCs.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
As part of the RDP, delegates attended sessions focused on economic,
trade and foreign policy, presidential debates and other topics, and listened
to the speeches at the convention site each night. In particular, the following
sessions took place:
·Opening Remarks
·Political Discussion with Former Chairmen of the
Republican National Committee
·The Untold Story of Economic Freedom and Today’s
International Crises: Panel Discussion
·The Future of U.S. National Security Policy:
Panel Discussion
·Biotechnology and Innovation: Panel Discussion
·U.S. Innovation, Technology, Manufacturing and
Job Growth: Panel Discussion
·Political Overview and the Commission on
Presidential Debates
·2012 Republican National Convention
·International Economic Trade: Panel Discussion.
This report summarizes the sessions that were part of
the RDP’s program; it does not summarize the political speeches.
OPENING REMARKS
Neil King, Wall Street Journal
·U.S. election campaigns are ongoing, and one
focus at this time is who is doing what in Tampa in order to position
themselves for the 2016 election.
·Including the primaries, between $3.5 billion
and $5 billion will be spent on the 2012 U.S. election campaigns, which is
equivalent to the gross domestic product of more than 40 countries.
·The 2012 election campaign essentially started
in November 2010, right after the mid-term elections were held; intensive
travel to the states began early in 2011.
·The Iowa straw poll is helpful in determining
the presidential candidate who has the “organizational muscle.”
·During the 2012 election campaign, there will be
about 20 televised debates; some see the debates as national “entertainment.”
·The U.S. economy is at an unusually weak moment;
the unemployment rate exceeds 8% and consumer confidence is low; on the basis
of the current U.S. economic indicators, one would think that there is no way
that the incumbent president could win the election, yet President Barack Obama
is tied with or leading presidential nominee Governor Mitt Romney in some
states according to some polls.
·Many held President Jimmy Carter responsible for
creating the economic malaise that existed during his presidency; the same is
not true regarding President Obama, with participants in a focus group
suggesting that the President Obama’s plan is “a work in progress” and that
President Obama “inherited a grim situation.”
·Four years ago, presidential nominee Senator
Barack Obama turned his “exoticness” into a positive “attribute”; presidential
nominee Governor Romney is also “exotic,” as he was the Republican Governor of
a New England state, is the son of a Mexican-born father, and spent four years
in France as a Mormon missionary.
·The Republican platform mirrors the heart of the
Republican Party.
·According to former Governor Jeb Bush, the
Republican Party needs to broaden its appeal.
·This U.S. presidential election may be the last
in which the ticket is comprised of two males from the northern part of the
United States.
Ed Goeas, The Tarrance Group
·Polls can be the “eyes and ears” of what is
happening; at this point, the two presidential candidates are close in the
polls, and the “race” is essentially frozen in place in the sense that the poll
numbers have not changed since late May 2012.
·Those in presidential nominee Governor Romney’s
campaign are probably satisfied with “where they are” at this point in the
campaign; it is likely that President Obama and those in his campaign are
“ringing their hands” about “where they are” at this point in the campaign.
·President Obama is having to run two campaigns
concurrently: one in relation to the U.S. economy, and the other in relation to
presidential nominee Governor Romney.
·Unless there are six months of solid,
consecutive, positive economic indicators, voters do not think that the
recovery is under way.
·In terms of voter focus, 70% are focused on
economic issues, including jobs, spending and taxes.
·Both President Obama and presidential nominee
Governor Romney have solidified their base.
·Pollsters sort through the myths to discern the
reality.
·At this point, President Obama’s approval rating
is 46%; his disapproval rating is 50%.
·In terms of intensity of feelings, the 2012
election is like the 1980 election.
·The Democrats are relatively non-white, single
and secular; the Republicans are relatively white, married and faith-based.
·For the first time in the United States, most
children were born out of wedlock in 2011.
·The 2012 presidential election will not be based
on personality; rather, it will be based on “who can get the job done”
regarding the economy.
·The 2012 presidential election will either be
close or presidential nominee Governor Romney will lead by five to six
percentages points.
William Harris, 2012 Republican National Convention
·A political convention is a way for members of a
party to come together and for the party to become stronger.
·The two-party system, which has led to stability
in the political process, is under attack, in part because of modern technology
and the 24/7 news channels; these channels are driven by market share and
thereby by “what sells.”
·In terms of the party platform, the process that
occurs during its formulation is more important than the resulting product.
·Campaign finance reform legislation always has
unintended, and intended, consequences.
·When planning the RNC, the process begins with
the site selection committee, which has a contract with the host state
committee; the convention is funded by federal grants and by funds raised by
the host committee.
·The United States is one of the most, if not the
most, powerful country in the world.
·With the 2012 convention, the Republican Party
has tried to create a convention “without walls,” which has resulted in a
digital presence on Facebook, the Internet, Twitter, etc.; this “digital
contract” can be used to reinforce the Republican message.
·The presidential nominee can drive his/her vision
to the people during the convention.
·The political convention is the disciplined
structure in an undisciplined organization; moreover, it is a focal point in
time and geography that can be used to inform voters.
POLITICAL DISCUSSION WITH FORMER CHAIRMEN OF THE
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
At the panel discussion, Tucker Carlson,
who is the editor of The Daily Caller and a contributor to Fox,
posed questions to three former chairmen of the Republican National Committee:
ØHonorable Haley Barbour, former Governor of
Mississippi and Chairman from 1993 to 1997
ØHonorable Jim Gilmore, former Governor of
Virginia and Chairman from 2001-2002
ØHonorable Jim Nicholson, former U.S. Secretary
of Veterans Affairs and Chairman from 1997 to 2001.
Tucker Carlson: What does presidential nominee Governor Romney need
to say during the RNC?
Honorable Jim Gilmore: Presidential nominee Governor Romney needs to speak
to the concerns of the American people, such as unemployment and
underemployment, a declining quality of life and other “human” concerns.
Tucker Carlson: To what extent should the focus at the RNC be
presenting the party’s “program” rather than criticizing the incumbent
president?
Honorable Haley Barbour: Many Americans believe that the country is headed in
the wrong direction.
Tucker Carlson: What attributes make presidential nominee Governor
Romney a “decent person”?
Honorable Jim Nicholson: There is a need to remind people of the condition
that the United States is in, and then to explain how the Republican Party
would fix problems. It is important for presidential nominee Governor Romney to
convey that he “feels the pain” of Americans, even if he has not lived their
life, since he has also faced hardships in his life.
Tucker Carlson: What response should be given to the demonization, by
President Obama, of presidential nominee Governor Romney and vice-presidential
nominee Representative Paul Ryan?
Honorable Jim Gilmore: It is important to ask: what happened to President
Obama’s momentum, hope and vision? What have been the results of the last four
years? What is President Obama’s vision for the future.
Tucker Carlson: What is the political “spin” that should be applied
by the Republican Party to the notion that the Democrat Party always “gives
more” to people?
Honorable Haley Barbour: Medicare expenditures have fallen since Senator Obama
became President Obama. The longer the debate about Medicare continues and the
more information that Americans get, the less happy they are about Obamacare.
Tucker Carlson: Who will control Medicare expenditures?
Honorable Jim Nicholson: Medicare is being used as a political “football.”
About 57% of U.S. households get a cheque from the federal government, so they
are beholden. Medicare was started in 1965, when the life expectancy was lower.
Tucker Carlson: Did the long Republican primary season help the
Republican Party?
Honorable Jim Gilmore: The rise of television, and the drama associated with
elections, sells a great deal of advertising.
Tucker Carlson: Is the primary process too democratic and/or too
chaotic?
Honorable Haley Barbour: The 2012 primary season was the ugliest process that
could be imagined; no one looked good. President Obama is a great uniter of
Republicans and conservatives.
Honorable Jim Nicholson: It is illogical to have two homogeneous states – Iowa
and New Hampshire – play such a large role. Presidential nominee Governor
Romney is a much better candidate for having come through the primary process.
Honorable Jim Gilmore: Someone who comes through the primary process is
stronger as a result.
Tucker Carlson: What should the Republican Party do about Senate
candidate Todd Aiken?
Honorable Haley Barbour: The Republican Party has no legal authority to force
Senate candidate Todd Aiken to end his campaign. He misspoke and will not win.
His campaign was fuelled by the Democratic Party.
Honorable Jim Nicholson: Presidential nominee Governor Romney showed courage
in dealing with the remarks made by Senate candidate Todd Aiken. He quickly
said that the candidate was wrong and should end his campaign.
Tucker Carlson: What does the Republican Party need to do in order to
win the election?
Honorable Jim Gilmore: There are no easy answers. It is important to
understand where people are coming from and ensure that it is obvious that you
care. Moreover, the Republican Party should indicate what it stands for and
what it means for America, for them and for their family.
Honorable Haley Barbour: The U.S. economy is in a terrible condition.
Honorable Jim Nicholson: An alignment of values is not enough. Immigration is
a tough issue for America and for the Republican Party; Hispanic office holders
and role models are needed. An election is not a sprint; rather, it is a long
race.
THE UNTOLD STORY OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AND TODAY’S
INTERNATIONAL CRISES: PANEL DISCUSSION
Kim Holmes, The Heritage Foundation
·A lack of economic freedom, which can led to
instability, is a phenomenon in a number of countries and regions in the world,
including Egypt; in that country, the result was the Arab Spring, where there
is a need to lift the “repressive hand of government” on the economy.
·Repressive regimes deny political and economic
freedoms, as denial of one inevitably leads to denial of the other, and such
repression inevitably leads to poverty.
·Free economies are more likely to respect the
environment, and people are both happier and healthier.
·The United States has been falling on the Index
of Economic Freedom; it is now ranked 10th and used to be ranked 5th.
·The United States’ ranking on the Index of
Economic Freedom is a reflection of conscious decisions made by American
decision makers; as the ranking has been falling, debt has been growing and
economic growth has been slowing.
Salim Furth, The Heritage Foundation
·The Arab Spring started because someone would
not pay a bribe, and spread because others could relate to his situation.
·Corruption bred the Arab Spring, and there is a quantitative
link between corruption and violence.
·In the Arab world, there is a need to:
Øcurb corruption
Øliberalize labour markets
Øreduce bureaucracy
Øexpand political representation.
Terry Miller, The Heritage Foundation
·The Index of Economic Freedom has existed for 18
years; it measures 10 economic freedoms in four pillars, and the standard of
living is higher in freer economies; the pillars and categories are:
Ørule of law
oproperty rights
ofreedom from corruption
Ølimited government
ofiscal freedom
ogovernment spending
Øregulatory efficiency
obusiness freedom
olabour freedom
omonetary freedom
Øopen markets
otrade freedom
oinvestment freedom
ofinancial freedom.
·Economic freedom leads to higher growth and
greater prosperity, thereby enabling a reduction in poverty, innovation, and
improved health, educational and environmental outcomes.
·Greece has problems on every measure of economic
freedom and is often last or second-last among euro zone countries.
·In Europe, an economic crisis usually becomes a
political crisis and leads to instability; in 2011, there were new governments
in Portugal, Italy, Spain and Greece.
·Based on the Index of Economic Freedom, the
problems in the European countries could have been predicted.
·In Europe, “big government” is the biggest
threat to economic freedom.
·Based on the Index of Economic Freedom, the
United States has moved from the category of “free” to “mostly free,” and the
country needs to change course now.
THE FUTURE OF U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY: PANEL
DISCUSSION
At the panel discussion, the Honorable Jim
Kolbe, former Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, posed questions to:
ØHonorable Norm Coleman, former U.S. Senator
ØHonorable Jim Talent, former U.S. Senator
ØHonorable Vin Weber, former Member of the U.S.
House of Representatives
ØHonorable Richard Williamson, former Ambassador
to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and Special Envoy for Sudan.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: How does presidential nominee Governor Romney differ
from President Obama in terms of foreign policy?
Honorable Richard Williamson
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney recognizes
that the United States is based on human rights and democracy, and he feels
strongly that the United States and the world are better off with U.S.
leadership.
·From a foreign policy perspective, President
Obama seeks risk avoidance.
·The bipartisan tradition of peace through
strength is embraced by presidential nominee Governor Romney; in terms of this
tradition, Presidents Carter and Obama are “outliers.”
Honorable Vin Weber
·The United States believes that it is special
and, as such, faces special obligations.
·The United States wants and intends to lead.
Honorable Jim Talent
·The United States maintains robust capabilities.
·The United States should cooperate with
countries that have the same goals and values.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·In order to “grow a job,” it helps to have had a
job.
·Given the current state of the U.S. economy, it
is hard for the United States to speak to the European Union about economic
issues.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What comments should be made about President Obama’s
view that the world wants a less-dominant United States?
Honorable Norm Coleman
·The world wants the United States to lead.
·When the United States fails to lead, there are
terrible consequences.
Honorable Jim Talent
·Leadership is key.
·The United States needs, and wants, allies.
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney understands
that alliances are stronger and burdens are shared when the United States
indicates its presence and commitment to lead.
Honorable Vin Weber
·The United States’ allies are stronger and more
capable of “doing their job” with U.S. leadership.
·The United States alone has the resources that
are needed.
Honorable Richard Williamson
·The United States should be reasonable,
responsible, rational, pragmatic and practical.
·The United States’ “foreign policy toolbox” is
large.
·Friends may not always agree, but they should
always try to work together.
·The United States is stronger when it works with
other countries.
·The United States should provide leadership.
·The Republican Party would rebuild the United
States’ relationships with its allies.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What specific actions should be taken regarding
Syria?
Honorable Richard Williamson
·President Obama and presidential nominee Governor
Romney have contrasting approaches.
·The United States has been “missing in action,”
and “allowing things to drift” does not mean that they will be solved.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·“Boots on the ground” are important.
·The United States needs to have “a seat at the
table.”
Honorable Jim Talent
·The right decisions lead to expanded options as
time goes on.
·American credibility needs to be affirmed.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: Recognizing that U.S. sanctions have not
worked, what should be done regarding Iran and its “drive” for nuclear weapons?
Honorable Vin Weber
·While President Obama has said many of the right
things, the military option should not be “on the table.”
·While tough sanctions are good, the assumption
is that Iran cares more about its people than it does about acquiring nuclear
capabilities.
Honorable Richard Williamson
·While tougher sanctions are good, it should be
noted that President Obama opposed these sanctions while he was in the U.S.
Senate.
·President Obama has an “engagement approach.”
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney believes in
engagement, but he does not believe in engagement for engagement’s sake.
Honorable Jim Talent
·Strong leadership, backed by action, is needed.
·The United States should:
Øbuild a missile defence system
Øimpose tougher sanctions
Øbuild coalitions of “the relevant”
Øact as quickly and consistently as possible, and
with like-minded allies.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·There are concerns about nuclear proliferation.
·Nuclear proliferation is a global issue.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What should be done regarding Afghanistan?
Honorable Jim Talent
·The Republican Party respects the date in 2014
for withdrawal from Afghanistan, but there is work to be done before then.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·The date in 2014 for withdrawal from Afghanistan
was selected for political reasons; the Republican Party would not make
decisions for political reasons.
·In the United States, support for Afghanistan
has fallen.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What role should the United States play in
the South China Sea?
Honorable Jim Talent
·The United States has a growing economic
relationship with China; that said, the United States should not move away from
existing strategic alliances in the Pacific.
·It is not possible to maintain credibility
without presence, and it is not possible to maintain presence without
relationships.
Honorable Vin Weber
·There is evidence that China’s economy is
slowing.
·It is important that the United States strengthen
its traditional relationships with allies in the region.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: Is Russia the United States’ primary
enemy?
Honorable Richard Williamson
·It is important to be honest about disagreements
and frank about long-term aspirations.
·There is concern about the “authoritarian drift”
in Russia.
·It is important to understand that people can
have legitimate differences.
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney believes
that the United States must “recalibrate” its approach regarding Russia.
Honorable Vin Weber
·“Geopolitical foe” and “military foe” are not
the same thing.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·There is a difference between being a foe and
being an enemy; foes respect active strength.
·There are some human rights concerns in relation
to Russia.
Honorable Jim Talent
·President Obama is sensitive to Russia’s
concerns, and Russia has responded by being insensitive.
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney believes
that relationships are built by being able to speak the truth.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What role should be played by humanitarian
considerations?
Honorable Richard Williamson
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney understands
and embraces the primary importance of security for the American people as the
first responsibility.
·Values should play a role in foreign policy.
·A wide range of foreign policy actions are
available, including:
Øsanctions
Ø“boots on the ground”
Øforeign assistance
Ødiplomacy.
Honorable Jim Talent
·U.S. leadership in the international community
is important.
·There is a need to take action against gross
atrocities.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: Should the United States’ embargo against
Cuba be lifted?
Honorable Jim Talent
·The United States’ embargo against Cuba should
not be lifted.
Honorable Vin Weber
·The United States’ embargo against Cuba should
not be lifted.
Honorable Richard Williamson
·The United States’ embargo against Cuba should
not be lifted.
Honorable Norm Coleman
·The United States’ embargo against Cuba should
not be lifted.
·When former Cuban President Fidel Castro is
gone, there will be opportunities; in the ensuing transition, there should be
democracy.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: What should be the United States’
relationship with Latin America?
Honorable Norm Coleman
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney wants a
robust relationship with, and expanded economic opportunities in, Latin
America.
·Latin America has many resources.
Honorable Jim Talent
·Trade and effective assistance can lead to the
creation of jobs.
Honorable Jim Kolbe: Is it the right time for the United States to reduce
funding for foreign assistance?
Honorable Vin Weber
·U.S. foreign assistance expenditures are
relatively minor, and now is not the best time to reduce these expenditures;
that said, it is difficult not to reduce such expenditures in light of the
pressure to reduce domestic spending.
·The private sector has a role to play regarding
foreign assistance.
Honorable Jim Talent
·Foreign assistance tools can be very effective
at a relatively low cost.
·Foreign assistance should be linked to foreign
policy, and there should be accountability and results.
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION: PANEL DISCUSSION
Robert Bradway, Amgen
·There is a need to nurture, invest in and focus
on innovation in both good times and bad times; as well, both the private and
public sectors have a role to play.
·There is a need to work together and to learn
from each other in order to advance innovation, including in respect of
biotechnology, for the benefit of all; it is not a zero-sum game.
·The right medicine should be provided to the
right patient at the right time.
·In the 20th century, advances in
biomedical knowledge have brought us to the cusp of a revolution.
·There is a global race in the area of biology;
many countries around the world have biotechnology-focused efforts.
·Pro-growth policies for biotechnology would
address the following five elements as a package rather than as a menu from
which a subset of actions should be chosen:
Øinvestments in scientific infrastructure,
especially basic scientific research and education
Østrong, enforceable intellectual property rights
in order to reward risk takers as well as attract investments for research,
development and marketing
Øregulations, with a focus on ensuring that they
are sound, predictable, transparent, non-discriminatory and science-based
Østable access to capital, including risk
capital, and an openness to international investment
Øa competitive market for customers and a market
that rewards innovation, with a recognition that most competitive markets are
led by private companies and not by state-owned enterprises.
·Innovation is a key driver for growth, and
policies that specifically support innovation are needed.
·Governments should invest in education as well
as research and development, and should support collaboration with the private
sector.
Honorable David Dreier, U.S. House of
Representatives
·There is a need to focus on the harmonization of
regulations.
·A Republican president with Republicans leading
both houses in the U.S. Congress would be good for all countries.
·Democrats look initially to the federal
government to solve societal problems, whereas Republicans look to the
following, in order: family, church, community, local government, county
government, state government and the federal government.
·Republicans want to enhance economic opportunity,
which occurs through economic liberalization.
·The existence of global poverty is linked to
violent extremism.
·The members of Congress who represent the Tea
Party understand the importance of globalization.
·The rule of law and the development of self-determination
can only occur with strong democratic institutions.
Stephen Klasko, University of South Florida
·Things are never transformed through changes to
the existing reality; to transform something, a new reality that makes the old
way obsolete is needed.
·A key question is: what can be done today to
begin the process of transformation?
U.S. INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGY, MANUFACTURING AND JOB
GROWTH: PANEL DISCUSSION
At the panel discussion, Joshua Bolten,
former White House Chief of Staff and a Director of the Office of Management
and Budget, made opening remarks and posed questions to the following
individuals following their opening remarks:
ØStephen Biegun, Ford Motor Company
ØWilliam Lane, Caterpillar Inc.
ØGregory Sebansky, Philips Electronics.
Joshua Bolten
·This election, probably more than any other
election in recent memory, is about the economy.
·Job growth is a pivotal element in the entire
election process.
·Economic growth and job growth are key, and they
are linked to the fiscal situation.
Gregory Sebasky
·There is a difference between transformation and
reform.
·The focus should be innovation and
private-sector solutions, rather than government solutions.
·Supply chains drive economies.
·The doctrine of national treatment is important.
William Lane
·There is a need to have a global perspective;
companies should be viewed as global entities that happen to have their
headquarters in a particular place.
·The Asian market is critical; China is more open
to investment than was Japan during the 1980s.
·The world is “awash” in money, but confidence is
lacking, and confidence takes leadership.
Stephen Biegun
·When the United States’ turnaround occurs, U.S.
manufacturing will have great prosperity because of “sound fundamentals.”
Joshua Bolten: What needs to be done at this point in time?
William Lane
·The most important issue in this election is
jobs, so there is a need to focus on what needs to be done to create jobs.
·Jobs are created when the right policies are
implemented.
·Businesses need to:
Øconvince decision makers to be bold, including
with respect to the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Øensure that there is a sense of urgency,
including with respect to the speed with which trade agreements are negotiated,
ratified and implemented
Øensure that the perfect is not permitted to
become the enemy of the good.
Gregory Sebasky
·Problems should be approached in a pragmatic way
and with an emphasis on evidence.
·Markets around the world need to be strong.
Joshua Bolten: What should be the policy message of the Republican
team?
Gregory Sebasky
The Republican team should convey a message of:
Øthe doctrine of national treatment
Øharmonization of regulations
Øa clear view on tax policy, including
simplification for corporations
Øgreater openness, including with respect to
visas.
William Lane
·The primary job of the U.S. Secretary of
Commerce, who has the “ear of the President,” is to create jobs and support
business.
·The U.S. Secretary of Commerce resigned 71 days
ago, with the result that there is currently no advocate – in the federal Cabinet
– for business.
·Growth must be a priority and at the centre of
all economic policies.
·All policy changes need to be focused on growth.
Joshua Bolten: What action should be taken regarding exchange rates?
Stephen Biegun
·The global economy should dictate the level of a
currency; governments should not be involved.
·Globally, currency interventions are replacing
tariff and non-tariff barriers as barriers to trade.
·When markets are open, governments have less
impetus to intervene regarding currency.
POLITICAL OVERVIEW AND THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL
DEBATES
Honorable Frank Fahrenkopf, Jr., Commission on
Presidential Debates and Former Chairman, Republican National Committee
·In the United States, the 2012 presidential
election campaign will begin in earnest after the Democratic National
Convention.
·Americans do not really start to focus on
election campaigns until after Labour Day.
·When Americans begin to focus on the election,
the presidential and vice-presidential debates will be a focus; 65% of
respondents say that the debates are an important factor in how they will vote.
·When considering the presidential nominees in
this election cycle, the American people will be faced with totally different
approaches regarding the role of government in the lives of the American
people; from that perspective, the debates may be more important this year than
ever before.
·The first televised presidential debate occurred
between Senator John Kennedy and Vice-President Richard Nixon; after that
debate, it was 16 years before the next presidential debate occurred.
·Presidential nominee Governor Carter challenged
unelected President Gerald Ford to a debate; President Ford had a low approval
rating because he had pardoned President Nixon.
·The presidential debate between President Ford
and presidential nominee Governor Carter was conducted by the League of Women
Voters, which also ran the debates in 1980 and in 1984.
·After the 1984 election, two study commissions
reached the same conclusion: an independent commission should be created, the
result of which was the Commission on Presidential Debates.
·The Commission on Presidential Debates – which
has Republican, Democratic and independent members – ran its first debate in
1988, with the debate between Vice-President George H. Bush and presidential
nominee Governor Michael Dukakis.
·Now, presidential and vice-presidential debates
are always held on university and college campuses; the institutions are
required to put up $1.5 million in endowment funds.
·In 1992, the Town Hall debate format was used
for the first time, with a debate among President George H. Bush and
presidential nominees Governor Bill Clinton and Ross Perot.
·President George H. Bush did not want to engage
in presidential debates in 1992; he felt that debating is beneath the dignity
of the president.
·The last presidential debate in 1992 was the
second-most watched show in history, next to the last episode of MASH.
·Formerly, the presidential debates occurred with
a moderator and a panel of reporters, who would take turns asking questions; in
1992, the Commission on Presidential Debates used a format that included a
single moderator and, beginning in 2000, this format has become the standard.
·The 2012 debates will have a new format:
Øa presidential debate focused on domestic policy
Øa vice-presidential debate focused equally on
domestic and foreign policy
Øa presidential debate with a Town Hall format
Øa presidential debate focused on international
policy.
·The 2012 presidential election is likely to be
decided by independent voters and by fewer than a dozen states, in which 90% of
the money will be spent.
·To date, it is thought that the debate between
vice-presidential nominees Governor Sarah Palin and Senator Joe Biden was the
most watched debate, while the debate between vice-presidential nominees
Senator Joe Lieberman and Dick Cheney was the most substantive debate.
·In selecting the moderators for the debates,
tapes are reviewed to assess whether the potential moderator’s reporting is
balanced and serious; care is taken to select individuals who will not use the
role of debate moderator to make a name for himself/herself.
·Over the last four years, President Obama has
been “missing in action,” and he has worked to lower people’s expectations
rather than to raise them.
·It does not occur to many Americans that someone
else will solve their problems; they depend on themselves.
·The 2012 election will be a choice about who
Americans are and what they believe.
·For four years, President Obama has been running
away from the nation’s problems; on the other hand, presidential nominee
Governor Romney has spent his entire life figuring out how to solve problems.
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney sees a
country that is ready for a comeback, and he is the man to lead that comeback.
·The current economic recovery is the slowest in
the nation’s history.
·The current situation is a result of the
decisions made by President Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress.
2012 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION
Alec Poitevint, 2012 Republic National Convention
·Planning a political convention requires putting
together a transportation system, changing something like a rink to something
like a theatre, ensuring back-up electrical and other systems, determining that
there are adequate hotel rooms, picking people to be part of the program, etc.
·During this RNC, the planning team holds a staff
meeting at 11 p.m. each day.
·A political party’s site committee sends out a
request for proposals, and the selection from among the cities that are
finalists is a business decision.
·A presidential nominee is not bound by the
positions contained in his/her party’s platform.
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC TRADE: PANEL DISCUSSION
At the panel discussion, Paula Dobriansky,
Harvard University and former Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global
Affairs, made opening comments and posed questions to:
ØHonorable Carlos Gutierrez, former U.S.
Secretary of Commerce
ØHonorable Grant Aldonas, former Under Secretary
of Commerce.
Paula Dobriansky
·The international economy is linked to the
domestic economy.
·Strong economic leadership is important.
Paula Dobrainsky: What are the key international and domestic economic
challenges?
Honorable Carlos Gutierrez
·The short-term economic situation is not good;
the economy is “standing still,” there is little momentum, the unemployment
rate is 8.3%, and 23 million Americans are either looking for a job, are
discouraged workers or are working part-time while wanting full-time
employment.
·Presidential Obama and presidential nominee
Governor Romney have much different philosophies about how to “grow” an
economy; the former supports regulations that impede business while the latter
is pro-business.
·President Obama’s Administration has made
matters worse rather than better, and has added $5 trillion to the U.S. debt.
·Globally, the U.S. deficit as a proportion of
gross domestic product is among the top five countries.
·From 1982 to 2007, members of the baby boom
generation bought homes, acquired assets and engaged in other behaviour that
led to economic growth; now, they have started to retire, which has led to
labour force shortages and these shortages have made it more difficult to pay
for Medicare and pensions.
·There is a “fairly decent” probability that
Greece may leave the euro monetary union.
·Russia has joined the World Trade Organization,
which is a “major step.”
·Asia is likely to become the world’s largest
trading union and to be larger than the European Union.
·The real trend is regionalization, not
globalization.
·The United States needs to “do work in its
neighbourhood” with its North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
partners; NAFTA has been “wildly successful” for all three countries.
·The United States has a free trade agreement
with some of the countries in Latin America; there is a need to integrate these
countries regionally so that – like Europe – countries in North America and
Latin America can become a region.
·Presidential nominee Governor Romney’s first
priority is Latin America.
·Eventually, the issues of Medicare and
immigration will be “fixed.”
Paula Dobriansky: What are the benefits to the United States and to
signatory countries of free trade agreements?
Honorable Grant Aldonis
·Over the last four years, there has been too
little discussion about free trade agreements and about what is occurring in
the global economy.
·With President Obama, there is a complete lack
of understanding about what globalization has done.
·During the global financial and economic crisis,
the “forces of protectionism" started to rise; free trade agreements
counteract these forces, and there is a need to liberalize trade and fight
against protectionism.
·Regionalism must not be trade-distorting.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group