From August 15-19, 2009, the Canadian
Section of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) was
represented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Council of State Governments –
Southern Legislative Conference (SLC) in Winston-Salem, North Carolina by the
Honourable Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P., Vice-Chair of the Group, Senator Wilfred
P. Moore, Q.C., Vice-Chair and Mr. Brad Trost, M.P., Vice-Chair.
Founded in 1947, the Southern
Legislative Conference includes state legislators from 16 southern states (see
the Appendix). Its mission is to foster and encourage intergovernmental
cooperation among member states.
The 16 states in the SLC are important
to the Canada-U.S. relationship. Of the estimated 7.1 million U.S. jobs that
depend on bilateral trade, recent figures indicate that more than 2.6 million
jobs in those 16 states rely on Canada-U.S. trade. Bilateral trade was recently
valued at more than US$118 billion annually: about US$55 billion was exported
from these states to Canada, while they imported just over $63 billion from Canada. Eleven of the 16 SLC states have Canada as their primary foreign export market.
Moreover, recent data suggest that, in a one-year period, Canadians made more
than 6.2 million visits to the SLC states and spent more than $3.8 billion,
while residents of these states made almost 2.2 million visits to Canada in
that same period and spent nearly $1.5 billion.
The 2009 Annual Meeting included a
variety of plenary, committee and task force sessions. The plenary sessions
were:
·Generating Economic Development During Times of
Extreme Fiscal Stress
·Economic Turbulence and State Investment
Strategies
·From Madoff to Medicaid Fraud
·A Conversation with Clyde Edgerton.
The following committees held sessions
during the meeting:
·Agriculture & Rural Development
·Economic Development, Transportation &
Cultural Affairs
·Education
·Energy & Environment
·Fiscal Affairs & Government Operations
·Human Services & Public Safety.
Finally, the Gulf Coast & Atlantic
States Regional Task Force held a meeting.
The interaction with state legislators
enables members of the Canadian Section of the IPG to better achieve the aim of
finding points of convergence in respective national policies, initiating
dialogue on points of divergence, encouraging exchanges of information and
promoting better understanding on shared issues of concern. Moreover, the
meetings with state legislators provide the members of the Canadian Section of
the IPG with an important means to provide input to, and gather information
about, state-level issues that affect Canada.
This report summarizes the discussions
that occurred at the plenary and selected committee sessions.
2009 AGFORUM: FOOD SAFETY IN
TRANSITION
Representative Terry England, State
of Georgia
·salmonella does not move freely through peanut
butter and peanut butter paste; consequently, it is possible to sample often
and not hit a “pocket” of salmonella
·every facility should have a Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Point (HACCP) system or HACCP-compatible system subject to
random inspections
·problems need to be identified early, before the
food enters the food chain
Senator Francis Thompson, State
of Louisiana
·food-borne illnesses are pervasive across the
nation
·there is an inadequate number of inspectors nationwide
·25% of the American population gets sick from
contaminated food, and more people die each year from food-borne illness than
were lost in the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in New York
·proactive steps should be taken rather than
reactive steps once a problem has occurred
·“meaningful” recall plans are needed when food
problems are identified
·corrective, rather than punitive, penalties are
needed, and should be sufficient to induce the “right” behaviours
Michael Doyle, University
of Georgia
·there are a number of weaknesses in the U.S.
food safety system, including in respect of:
osurveillance – states are not equally committed
and have limited resources to participate in PulseNet, which is the principal
food safety surveillance system for detecting food-borne-illness outbreaks
oinspection – the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration delegates a large proportion of food plant inspections to
states, and state inspection programs vary in terms of the competence of
inspectors, the depth of inspections, the adequacy of inspection programs, the
frequency of inspections, the nature and degree of follow-up when deficiencies
are observed, and the communication of findings to the Food and Drug
Administration
othe inspection and testing of imported foods –
with imported foods, concerns include microbiological safety issues, pathogen
contamination of produce and fecal waste used in aquaculture production in some
countries
othird-party audits – many food companies use
third-party auditors to determine the compliance of suppliers with
requirements, and auditors may not be knowledgeable or adequately trained for
the type of plant being inspected, they may have a bias since they are being
paid by the company requesting the audit and plants are typically on their
"best behaviour" during inspections since audits are often announced
in advance
odifferences among companies in their commitment to food safety –
economics is the primary driver for many companies, and often they do not test
the finished food product for harmful microbes
·standardized inspections across levels of
government are needed
·federal inspections are infrequent
·lab testing varies in credibility, as do
sampling protocols
·with the globalization of the food industry,
there has been a dramatic increase in the importation of food into the U.S.
·sanitation practices for food production and
preparation are not equivalent throughout the world
·in some countries, sewage and manure are used as
fertilizers
·about 1% of U.S. Food and Drug
Administration-regulated imported food is visually inspected, and less than
0.5% of such food shipments are tested
·testing of representative samples of large
shipments of imported foods is inadequate
·many of the methods used for testing food
contaminants are decades old and need updating
·the notion of risk-based food testing is
ill-defined and not scientifically vetted
Steve Solomon, United States Food and Drug Administration
·President Obama, who has given his personal
commitment to improve food safety, has established a food safety working group;
as well, both the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives are examining
food safety legislation
·rather than the current system, which is
reactive, the focus should be proactive prevention of food-borne illnesses; it
is preferable to prevent problems before they occur
·the food supply can become contaminated by many
stakeholders at many points; as well, there are many authorities across levels
of government with responsibility for food safety
·both intentional and unintentional food
contamination occurs
·over time, how food is produced, cooked and
consumed has changed; consider, for example:
odifferent nutritional habits
oconsumption of meals outside the home
opurchases made at grocery stores rather than
farmers' markets
othe consumption of baby carrots rather than
carrots peeled and cut at home
ocontamination of diners at a salad bar resulting from a contaminated
head of lettuce rather than contamination of one family at home
oglobalization and food imports with no knowledge of the food safety
systems used in other countries
·a public-health-oriented food safety system with
3 foci is needed:
oprevention as a priority
ostrengthened surveillance and enforcement
oimproved response and recovery
·federal and state food safety systems are not
sufficiently integrated; as well, standards differ and there is some
duplication
·the nation needs a more systematic, integrated
approach to identifying and controlling risks that lead to food-borne
illnesses, with proper enforcement
·a prevention-based food safety system requires:
oregistration
oprevention controls
ooversight
oinformation access
oregulatory tools for offenders
otraceability throughout the system
othe sharing of information
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND
SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT (Human Services & Public Safety Committee)
Toni King, State of North Carolina
·disabled Americans need to be assisted in
preparing for, securing and maintaining gainful employment
·successful employment outcomes should be an
important goal
·it is important that disabled employees are able
to perform the essential elements of their job with reasonable accommodation
GENERATING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DURING TIMES OF EXTREME FISCAL STRESS
Ray Perryman, The Perryman Group
·there are no magic answers to the questions of
how the global economy "got into this mess" or how it should go about
getting out of it
·opportunities for families, communities and
businesses must be created and maximized
·there is a need to focus on what will happen
once recovery occurs, since the recovery may happen quickly and the U.S. needs
to be competitive
·the right economic development incentives must
exist
·the single most important consideration in terms
of economic development is ensuring that a community is a place where people
want to locate and live, since it is not possible to provide people with enough
incentives to locate where they do not really want to be; consequently,
infrastructure, schools, the regulatory and tax systems, etc. must be
considered
·economic stimulus funds should be leveraged for
long-term benefit
ECONOMIC TURBULENCE AND STATE
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
Janet Cowell, State of North Carolina
·the 2008 stock market crash will affect state
budgets for the next 5-10 years
·most states have defined benefit pension plans
for state employees, and these plans are characterized as being a three-legged
stool:
oemployer contributions
oemployee contributions
oinvestment returns
·in the future, increases in employer
contributions to defined benefit pension plans for state employees are likely
to be required
·states have essentially five options in terms of
defined benefit pension plans for state employees:
oincrease employer contributions
oincrease employee contributions
ochange benefits going forward
oincrease investment returns
oimplement some combination of the previous four options
·private saving for retirement should be
encouraged
SECURING THE SOUTH’S ENERGY FUTURE
(Energy & Environment Committee)
Ken Nemeth, Southern States
Energy Board
·the U.S. needs a reliable and secure supply of
energy
·technologies that require a lot of water will
not be available in the future due to water shortages
·each state should have an energy plan and
strategy
·cybersecurity for energy infrastructure must be
considered
·energy infrastructure needs to be built and, in
some cases, re-built
·energy policy has become climate policy
·U.S. dependence on foreign oil means that U.S.
dollars are "flying out the door"
·electricity is now more important than ever
before; as appliances, "gadgets," hybrid cars, etc. are developed,
more electricity is needed
·all sources of energy – coal, oil, gas, nuclear,
wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, etc. – have limits on supply and growth
·in some sense, energy efficiency is "the
first fuel;" a great deal can be done with efficiency
·the key with wind energy is getting it to market
·the U.S. South has opportunities for solar
energy
·heat that is the output of a process should be
used as an input for another process
·carbon capture and storage should be considered
for coal-fired plants
·regulatory certainty is needed
·according to one source, there are four
interrelated crises in the United States:
othe economy
othe climate
oenergy security
ocompetitiveness
·in dealing with some of the crises in the U.S.,
there are at least five changes that could be beneficial:
oplace a value on carbon
oprovide utilities with the proper incentives
ofund research and development into clean energy
odevelop and implement stronger standards for
buildings, appliances, etc.
oensure the existence of a robust trade policy
Bill Schafer, Range Fuels
·all forms of energy can play a role in the U.S.'
energy future
·some of the current energy-related technologies
have limitations; consider, for example:
oagricultural production used for food rather
than fuel
oenergy output in relation to the energy used as an input to make the
energy output
·woody biomass has a different maturation cycle
than herbaceous biomass
Rodney Andres, University
of Kentucky
·energy is a global commodity, and the United States competes globally for it
·while the U.S. has fossil energy resources,
there are concerns about how these resources can be used without harming the
environment
·in the United States, carbon dioxide emissions
result from:
oelectric power
otransportation
oeverything else
·often, the production of goods is associated
with the production of carbon dioxide
·there are transmission and/or storage challenges
associated with both wind and solar power
·carbon capture and storage demonstration
projects must continue
·the United States should continue to:
oprovide incentives for new technologies
oinnovate
odevelop new technologies to deal with carbon
odevelop new and renewable energy resources
Joseph Craft, Alliance Resource
Partners
·picking "winners" is challenging
·coal "keeps the lights on"
·low-cost energy has been, is and will continue
to be the backbone of the U.S., and will contribute to job creation
·low-cost energy is a magnet for businesses and
for jobs
·governments and industry should work together in
solving problems
·coal, which is the fastest-growing fuel
worldwide because of its relatively low cost, is a critical component of the
U.S.' energy portfolio
·coal has a history of environmental success in
respect of nitrous and sodium oxides
·if a nation does not have jobs, it does not have
wealth
·the principles underlying sound energy policies
include:
oenergy independence
oimproved energy efficiency
oan examination of the science behind global
warming
oa reliance on all forms of energy
oprotection of national security
oinvestments in research and development as well
as incentives for technology
ooperation of the free market to provide low-cost, affordable energy
Christopher Hamilton, West Virginia Coal Association
·coal mining leads to jobs, tax revenues, etc.
·the coal industry has been revolutionalized by
technology
·coal needs to be part of the U.S.' energy
portfolio
·mountain top, or surface, mining is occurring in
some places and, since some counties are virtually dependent on surface mining,
it should not be prohibited
EDUCATION AND THE FISCAL STIMULUS
(Education Committee)
Jim Wynn, The Education Trust
·there are enormous differences between the U.S.
South and the rest of the nation in terms of per-child support
·an important question is: are all children not
the same, regardless of the state in which they reside?
Stacey Jordan, United States
Department of Education
·the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (ARRA) allocated funds to education
·ARRA funds should be committed thoughtfully,
quickly and transparently
·common standards enable comparisons with peers
·high-quality information enables better
decision-making
·intervention should occur with chronically
low-performing schools
COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE
Chris Minnich, Council of Chief State School Officers
·each state has its own academic standards and
students in each state learn to different levels; having 50 different sets of
standards is unfair for children
·49 states and territories have signed the Common
Core State Standards Initiative led by the National Governors Association and
the Council of Chief State School Officers; the initiative will potentially
affect 43.5 million students, or about 87% of the student population
·the common core state standards will be based on
research and evidence from leading national organizations as well as from
high-performing states and counties; they will reflect what a student needs in
order to be successful in college and in the workplace
·there is a collective need to develop and adopt
core academic standards in mathematics and English language arts
·all students should have equal access to an
excellent education
·students must be prepared to compete not only
with their peers in the next state, but also with their peers in other
countries worldwide
·for students, common core state standards will:
ohelp to prepare students with the knowledge and
skills needed to succeed in college and in a career
oensure that expectations are consistent for all
children, regardless of the state in which they live
ohelp students to make transitions between states
ohelp students understand what is expected of them and enable more
self-directed learning by them
·for educators, common core state standards will:
oallow more focused pre-service and professional
development
oassure that what is taught is aligned with
assessments, including formative, summative and benchmarking
oprovide the opportunity for educators to tailor
curricula and teaching methods
oinform the development of curricula that promote deep understanding
for students
·for states, common core state standards will:
oallow states to align curricula to
internationally benchmarked standards
oallow states to ensure professional development
for educators that is based on best practices
ocreate the opportunity for the United States to
compete for high-wage, high-skill jobs in a knowledge-based economy
oallow the development of a common assessment
standard
ogive states the opportunity to compare and
evaluate policies that affect student achievement across states
ocreate potential economies of scale in respect of curricula
development, assessment, etc.
FROM MADOFF TO MEDICAID FRAUD
Harry Markopolos, Independent
Financial Fraud Investigator & Analyst
·while stealing money is bad, someone's health is
stolen with medicare fraud
·$0.30 of every medicare dollar is wasted because
of the wrong treatment, and $0.10 of every medicare dollar is stolen by
fraudsters
·health care costs, which currently represent 16%
of the U.S.' gross domestic product, may rise to 20% unless changes are made;
the U.S. spends the most among Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development nations, yet the nation's public health statistics rank at or near
the bottom of most health-quality measures
·to balance the U.S. federal budget, an immediate
wage tax of 14.4% would be required
·the fiscal imbalance in the United States rises by $2.4 trillion annually
·one-half of U.S. states have false claims
statutes in respect of medicaid fraud
·Bernard Madoff had thousands of direct and
indirect victims; it was clear as early as 2002 that he was operating a Ponzi
scheme
·the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is a
captive regulator, and the securities industry is a huge and powerful lobby
·the situations that arose in respect of Madoff
and the sub-prime mortgage crisis have had reputational costs for the United
States in capital markets, resulting in a higher cost of capital for American
consumers and businesses
·rigorous enforcement is needed
·if it seems too good to be true, it probably is
BRIDGING THE RURAL-URBAN DIVIDE
(Agriculture & Rural Development Committee)
Jason Gray, The Aspen Institute
·increasingly, the United States is a
metropolitan country
·slightly more than one-half of the U.S.'
"rural" population, as defined by the Census Bureau, lived in a
metropolitan county at the time of the 2000 Census
·rural residents are not always where we think
they are, and more integration is occurring than you would expect
·definitions of "urban" and
"rural" are inconsistent and changing
·inner-city neighbourhoods and "small-town
America" are deeply engaged in re-creating, or in preserving, quality
places that can prosper and that can be places in which one's children would
want to live or to which they would want to return
John Molinaro, The Aspen
Institute
·there are a number of key policy areas where
“urban” and “rural” can come together:
othe persistence of poverty
oeconomic restructuring
opublic education
ohealth care
oimmigration
opolitical voice
oclean air and water
othe preservation of liveable spaces and the
countryside for future generations
osustainable energy production and consumption
·not only are there similarities between urban
and rural regions in terms of people and issues, we are often talking about the
very same people at various times in their lives
·urban and rural regions need to form strategic
alliances: they can struggle alone or prosper together
·the futures of urban and rural regions are
shaped by state policies
·there are five key strategies:
oredefine “rural”, “urban” and “suburban” into
meaningful regions
odevelop new champions and non-traditional
leadership
obuild on rural-urban partnerships that work
obuild a rural-urban advocacy agenda regarding
policy opportunities
otest and disseminate the power of a rural-urban framework
·two major factors will drive the agenda in this
century:
oenergy
othe environment
·every solution to energy and environmental
challenges is at the intersection of rural and urban issues
Ken Stauber, Danville Area
Foundation
·there is a battle among the old economy, the new
economy and no economy
·the focus in the old economy was producing goods
and providing services as inexpensively as possible; this approach was not
beneficial for rural areas
·the focus in the new economy is re-creating a
competitive advantage as a region every 5-10 years
·communities must speak with one voice and
cooperate in order to build a competitive advantage
·there are three areas to "track":
oare "living wage" jobs being created?
owhat is happening to the population aged 25 to
55 years?
ohow are children doing in school?
HOW DO WE MOVE TOWARD HIGH SPEED
RAIL? (Economic Development, Transportation & Cultural Affairs Committee)
Pat Simmons, North Carolina
Department of Transportation
·the use of rail to transport cargo reduces
greenhouse gas emissions and congestion on highways
·the U.S. needs to build a national rail network
in the same way that the nation once built a national highway network
Tony Morris, American Magley
·these days, everything must be "green"
·consumers want speed, frequency and flexibility
FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION
REAUTHORIZATION AND THE SUCCESSOR TO SAFETEA-LU (Economic Development,
Transportation & Cultural Affairs Committee)
Curtis Johnson, United States
Department of Transportation
·America's history is a
history of transportation
·the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 contains funds for transportation
INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD: TRENDS
FROM SOUTH CAROLINA, THE SLC AND THE NATION (Economic Development,
Transportation & Cultural Affairs Committee)
Matt Silveston, American Society
of Civil Engineers
·the American Society of Civil Engineers would
give an overall grade of D to the nation's infrastructure; in particular:
odams: D
odrinking water: D-
ohazardous waste: D
olevees: D-
osolid waste: C+
owastewater: D-
oaviation: D
otransit: D
obridges: C
oenergy: D+
oinland waterways: D-
opublic parks and recreation: C-
orail: C-
oroads: D-
oschools: D
·users must pay an appropriate price for their
use of infrastructure
·infrastructure "solutions" include:
oincrease state and federal leadership
opromote sustainability and resiliency
odevelop local, state, regional and national
infrastructure plans
oconsider life-cycle costs and maintenance
oincrease investments from all stakeholders
THE DRIVE TO MOVE SOUTH: HOW DO WE
MOVE IT TO A HIGHER-TECH GEAR? (Economic Development, Transportation &
Cultural Affairs Committee)
Simon Cobb, Center for Automotive
Research
·there have been dramatic changes in the
"fortunes" of the automotive industry in the last six months;
however, some of the issues that led to the current situation started in the
1990’s
·there is a huge variety of automotive products
in the marketplace
FUNDING THE ARTS DURING EXTREME
FISCAL STRESS (Economic Development, Transportation & Cultural Affairs
Committee)
Milton Rhodes, Arts Council of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County in North Carolina
·as the nation emerges from the recession, the
arts will be critical
·the arts are linked to jobs, education, gross
domestic product, workforce improvements, social capital, the look and feel of
communities, the revitalization of cities, etc.
·the arts should be celebrated, since they affect
the quality of life
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Jerahmiel Grafstein, Q.C.,
Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group