From April 11-13, 2010, Mr. Gord Brown,
M.P., Co-Chair of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG), led
a delegation to the Third Annual Conference of the Southeastern United
States-Canadian Provinces (SEUS-CP) Alliance in Biloxi, Mississippi. Other
members of the delegation included the Honourable Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P.,
Vice-Chair and the Honourable Richard Neufeld, Senator. The delegation was
accompanied by Jim Latimer, Acting Executive Secretary, and June Dewetering,
Advisor to the IPG.
THE EVENT
The SEUS-CP Alliance is a trade- and
investment-focused partnership among six southeastern US states – Alabama,
Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee – and seven
Canadian provinces – Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova
Scotia, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward Island. The group was established in
2007 to serve as a forum through which common interest in enhancing economic
ties between the two regions could be advanced. The group will hold its fourth
annual conference in New Brunswick in June 2011.
Governors Haley Barbour (Mississippi),
Sonny Perdue (Georgia), Mark Sanford (South Carolina) and Phil Bredesen
(Tennessee) attended the Alliance’s third annual conference, as did Premiers
Danny Williams (Newfoundland and Labrador), Robert Ghiz (Prince Edward Island)
and Jean Charest (Quebec). Alabama and North Carolina were represented by
Secretary of Commerce Neal Wade and Lieutenant Governor Walter Dalton
respectively, while Manitoba, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were represented by
Ministers Peter Bjornson, Victor Boudreau and Percy Paris respectively.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
This conference marked the first
occasion on which the IPG attended a meeting of the SEUS-CP Alliance. In some
sense, the Alliance is the eastern counterpart to the Pacific NorthWest
Economic Region – PNWER – which involves representatives of the public and
private sectors, but which typically does not include participation by US
governors or Canadian premiers.
Members of the Canadian Section of the
IPG regularly attend PNWER meetings, and delegates were interested in comparing
PNWER and the SEUS-CP Alliance, and in taking advantage of the opportunity to
speak with governors, premiers, and representatives of the public and private
sectors about issues that are important to Canada and/or to the Canada-US
relationship.
Delegates noted the practical nature of
the Alliance’s conference and the attendance of a number of US governors and
Canadian premiers, which – from one perspective – indicates the stature of the
SEUS-CP Alliance and its accomplishments. At the conference, delegates were
able to speak with the governors and premiers, as well as with American and
Canadian business interests, about the IPG and federal actions that are being
and might be, taken to support the bilateral relationship. Among the specific
business sectors examined (indicated below), advanced manufacturing and energy
are particularly important in light of the integrated nature of the Canadian
and US economies, and Canada’s role as a stable and secure supplier of energy
to the US.
On balance, the delegates found the
event to be useful, particularly in terms of the ability to speak with
governors and premiers as well as to inform Americans about Canadian
priorities. Feeling that delegates were able to achieve their objectives for
the event, the IPG intends to participate at future annual meetings of the
SEUS-CP Alliance and to continue its work in advocating Canadian interests,
particularly with governors and US business interests.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
At the conference, a townhall meeting
moderated by Shepard Smith, Fox News Anchor, was held with governors and
premiers, or their designated officials. As well, concurrent workshops were
held on three business sectors:
·advanced manufacturing
·geospatial technologies
·energy.
In respect of each of these business
sectors, three perspectives were examined:
·trade
·research and development
·investment.
Consequently, during the conference, a
total of nine workshops were held in addition to more than 300
business-to-business meetings and four concurrent technical tours:
·Keesler Air Force Base Cyber Security Center
·Trinity Yachts
·Northrop Grumman Unmanned Systems Center
·Marine Mammal Institute/Katrina Recovery.
This report summarizes the discussions
that were held at the townhall meeting and selected concurrent workshops.
TOWN HALL SESSION
Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith moderated
a discussion with Governors Haley Barbour, Sonny Perdue, Mark Sanford and Phil
Bredesen, Secretary of Commerce Neal Wade, Lieutenant Governor Walter Dalton,
Premiers Danny Williams, Robert Ghiz and Jean Charest, and Ministers Peter
Bjornson, Victor Boudreau and Percy Paris. Mr. Smith posed questions to each of
the participants.
Question for Governor Barbour: What are the guiding principles for governments during a
recession?
Answer: Governments
should be sure not to spend money that they do not have and they should be sure
not to spend all of the money that they do have. The US states have had a huge
infusion of federal funds. State government revenues typically trail the
economic recovery by 12-18 months.
Question for Premier Williams: What is the role of North American governments in facilitating
clean energy resources?
Answer:
Governments have a significant role to play in facilitating clean energy
resources and the transition from traditional to renewable energy sources. As
well, governments have a role to play in ensuring the existence of the
infrastructure that is needed for all regions to access energy. In Canada, some
of the federal stimulus “shovel-ready” funds should have been allocated to
green projects; since they were not, an opportunity has been lost.
Question for Premier Ghiz: In light of the globalized world, what factors make a region stand
out as the number one place in which to do business?
Answer:
The “new economy” presents huge opportunities and, with technology, geographic
location is relatively less important since business can be conducted from
anywhere in the world. In order to attract businesses, it is critically
important to have a well-educated, skilled workforce and to have a competitive
tax structure. Provinces and states should establish the right environment, and
then “get out of the way” so that businesses can “do their thing.”
Question for Governor Perdue: What are the two most important components of international
economic development?
Answer:
The role of government is to facilitate business-to-business opportunities.
With Canada serving as the primary foreign export market for a number of
southeastern states, a focus should be the establishment of synergies, with the
strengths of the provinces combined with the strengths of the states.
Recognizing that the current economic downturn will pass, it is important to
take a long-term view, and to establish person-to-person and leader-to-leader
relationships.
Question for Premier Charest: What trade, investment and scientific exchange opportunities are
likely to arise as a consequences of the SEUS-CP Alliance?
Answer:
Canadians pay attention to what happens in the United States, which is
particularly important in light of global supply chains and integrated
industries; Canada is a trade-dependent nation. Increasingly, states and
provinces will be called upon to act, and governors and premiers will play a
larger role in the future than they have in the past. The core of the Canada-US
relationship is energy. Finally, there is a question looming on the horizon:
with the US deciding to spur economic growth and job creation through exports,
where does that leave Canada?
Question for Governor Bredesen: In light of the historic nature of the relationship that is shared
between the US and Canada, how can the relationship remain relevant?
Answer:
Like any relationship, the two countries must continue to “work at it.” The two
countries need a long-standing commitment to doing things together in good
years and in bad years. That being said, it should be recognized that the
bilateral relationship is asymmetric because of the relative size of the
nations. Finally, it is important to take the time to go to Canada and to
educate American businesspeople about the nature and extent of the bilateral
trade relationship.
Question for Minister Bjornson: What are the opportunities for the SEUS-CP Alliance to expand trade
and investment?
Answer:
In order to expand the nature and scope of bilateral trade and investment, the
current bilateral relationship must be understood clearly. The global economic
recession has affected integrated industries and supply chains, and
protectionist measures must be avoided. The SEUS-CP Alliance is an
institutionalized method of cooperation, and the provinces and states should
create a business-friendly environment where businesses can flourish.
Question for Governor Sanford: How do you create an opportunity where the economy and the
environment are not in conflict?
Answer:
Some hypothesis that the environment and the economy are in conflict should be
rejected. Locations that offer a high quality of life attract people, and
environmental sensitivity attracts people.
Question for Minister Boudreau: What is New Brunswick’s contribution to the energy that Canada
exports to the United States?
Answer:
New Brunswick is the only Atlantic Canadian province that shares a border with
the US; consequently, New Brunswick and the US northeast are involved in a
number of projects. New Brunswick’s diversified energy sources include wind,
hydroelectricity, and oil and gas; tidal and biomass energy are being explored.
Question for Lieutenant-Governor
Dalton: How can the SEUS-CP Alliance support the
strength of the manufacturing sector as a means of maintaining jobs?
Answer:
The roots of the knowledge-based economy are in manufacturing. Manufacturing
will continue to be important, but the focus will be advanced manufacturing –
which leads to a need for more highly skilled employees – rather than
traditional manufacturing. In this regard, innovation, advanced manufacturing
and technology, and a highly qualified workforce are important.
Question for Minister Paris: What efforts are needed in order to ensure green jobs and a green
economy?
Answer:
It is crucial to be inclusive and to not act in isolation. Stakeholders must
keep each other informed and focus on the “larger picture.”
Question for Secretary of Commerce
Wade: How is a focus on the environment and a
reduced carbon footprint leading to job creation?
Answer:
Research and development provides new approaches to renewable energy. Job
creation must be an ongoing focus.
KEYNOTE LUNCHEON
Michael Ducker, FedEx Corporation
·FedEx Corporation is very excited about the
US-Canada relationship, which is mutually beneficial, and sees lots of business
opportunities
·the economies of the SEUS-CP Alliance members
are important to each other
·Canada is the largest energy supplier to, and
trading partner with the US
·trade among the three North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) countries has more than tripled since the Agreement’s
inception; NAFTA created the world’s largest free trade area
·despite its success, NAFTA continues to be
maligned, and there are efforts under way in Congress to repeal the agreement
·there are a variety of myths about NAFTA,
including:
ØNAFTA has not achieved the goal of increased trilateral trade and
investment
ØNAFTA has resulted in job losses
ØNAFTA harms workers by eroding labour standards and reducing wages
ØNAFTA does nothing to help the environment
·as economies in Asia and Europe continue to
integrate, it is increasingly important that the three NAFTA countries continue
to work together and strengthen their trade relationships
·protectionism is a step in the wrong direction;
in that regard, the February 2010 agreement between Canada and the US in
respect of the Buy American provisions in the US stimulus package is a step in
the right direction
·Canada and the US must work together to create
opportunities for both countries, and can collaborate in such areas as:
Øcarbon capture and storage
Øtrade
Øinvestment
Øthe electricity grid and smart meters
Ørenewable energy
Øaviation security
·Canada and the United States:
Øwork together
Øtrade together
Øinvest in each other
Øcreate jobs together
Øpromote trade liberalization together
·economic ties strengthen political partnerships
ADVANCED
MANUFACTURING: TRADE PERSPECTIVE
Paul
Graham, Graham Capital Partners, LLC
·in a globalized system, location and who you
were do not matter; what matters is what you are, and what you are depends on
whether you make choices for prosperity
·advanced manufacturing is associated with high
levels of design or scientific skills to produce products and processes; it
usually involves high value, multiple commercial applications and innovation
·it is a myth that Canada and the US can no
longer compete in manufacturing
·in March 2010, the US manufacturing sector
expanded at its strongest level in the last five and one-half years, with
increased exports and inventory levels
·since 1947, value-added manufacturing in the US
has grown seven-fold, the same rate of growth as in gross domestic product
·57% of all US exports are manufactured goods
·56% of all private-sector research and
development is found in four sectors:
Øcomputers and electronics
Øchemicals
Øaerospace
Øautomotive
·the United States is a preferred destination for
foreign direct investment
·the global economy is expected to double over
the next decade, and growth sectors are likely to include:
Øplastic electronics
Øindustrial biotechnology`
Øcomposites
Øelectronics
Øinformation and knowledge management
·significant growth is expected to occur in such
existing sectors as:
Øenergy
Øaerospace
Øautomotive
·challenges to future growth are likely to
include:
Øaccess to information
Øadaptation of new technologies
Øaccess to capital
Øexpanded capital markets that support innovation
Øthe pace of change
Cindy McGuire, C-Vision
·it is important to:
Ørecognize a client need
Øbuild a cost-competitive, high-quality product
Øget the product to the client before competitors do so
·global competition has resulted in increased
demand for customized, high-quality, cost-competitive products
·the model for an advanced manufacturing facility
starts with a product or a product design; work then occurs with designers to
ensure a simple, repeatable design that can be manufactured
·to ensure success, suppliers to an advanced
manufacturer must also be advanced manufacturers and advanced thinkers
·quality and repeatability are key
Ted
Traynor, Liburdi Turbine Services, Inc.
·the US can benefit from advanced manufacturing
through:
Ønew technology
Øcomplementary technology
Øflexibility
Øexpanded market reach
Øfuture expansion opportunities
ENERGY: R & D PERSPECTIVE
Louis Circeo, Georgia Institute
of Technology
·plasma arc technology is ideally suited for waste
treatment since, with the application of temperatures from 4,000° Celsius to
more than 7,000° Celsius, hazardous and toxic compounds are broken down into
their elemental constituents
·with plasma arc technology, organic materials
are gasified or melted and residual materials, such as inorganic materials and
heavy metals, are immobilized in a rock-like mass that is highly resistant to
leaching
·with plasma arc technology, municipal solid
waste can become gravel, sand, insulation or soundproofing
·plasma arc technology:
Øaccepts all solid and liquid wastes without pre-processing,
including hazardous or toxic materials, medical waste, asbestos and tires
Øis a closed-loop system, with no direct gaseous emissions to the
atmosphere and no landfill requirements
Øinvolves total waste reclamation, with the fuel value of wastes
recovered and the process resulting in salable residues, such as metals and
aggregates
·plasma processing has unique treatment
capabilities that are unequalled by existing technologies
·with plasma arc technology, it may be more
cost-effective to take municipal solid waste to a plasma facility for energy
production than to dump it in a landfill
·plasma processing of municipal solid waste has
the potential to supply about 5% of US electricity needs, which is equivalent
to about 25 nuclear power plants
·when plasma arc technology is fully developed,
it may become cost-effective to “mine” existing landfills for energy production
·plasma processing of municipal solid waste in
the US could reduce the disposal problems associated with such waste, alleviate
the energy crisis and reduce the need for landfills
Wayne MacQuarrie, PEI Energy
Corporation
·there are economic and environmental concerns in
respect of many energy sources
·Prince Edward Island is Canada’s “green
province” and is ideally suited to wind power although, at present, most of its
energy is from imported fossil fuels
·wind farms in Prince Edward Island are helping
to meet the need for electricity
·wind turbines can be situated along the coast
line to take advantage of wind from water
·wind power can be competitive with conventional
sources of energy, can lead to more stable electricity prices and can help to
meet local energy needs
·wind farms can contribute to renewable energy
exports
·wind power is intermittent and unpredictable,
and the electricity generated from wind must be used immediately, since it
cannot reasonably be stored
Stephen Spivey, Santee Cooper
·US renewable energy resources include solar,
biomass, geothermal and wind
·while, at present, most biomass is wood chips or
wood waste, landfill gas is a source of biomass
GEOSPATIAL
TECHNOLOGIES: INVESTMENT PERSPECTIVE
Joe
Davis, Department of Homeland Security
·geographic-information-system technology has
unlimited possibilities
Kelly Vodden, Memorial University
·the nature of rural-urban interactions is
changing
·there is a growing emphasis on regions and
regional government
·the terms “rural” and “urban” are interpreted
differently by different people
·in some instances, a maze of administrative
regions may be formed to meet specific administrative or service requirements,
which may not be appropriate for purposes of economic development planning
·using geographic information systems, linkages
among communities can be identified and mapped
·as transportation costs rise, the effective size
of the local labour market is reduced
·tools to help rural development planners are
needed
David Holdstock, Geographic
Technologies Group
·everyone wants the same things: accountability
and measurable results
·the benefits of geographic information systems
include:
Øincreased efficiency
Øincreased productivity
Øreduced costs
Øhigher-quality decisions
Øincreased data accuracy
Øimproved information processes
Øcompliance with government mandates
Øreduced mortality
Øimproved communication, coordination and collaboration`
Øimproved automation and workflow
Ømore effective management of assets and resources
Respectfully
submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group