On November 7, 2010, Senator Consiglio
Di Nino led a Canadian delegation composed of Mr. Peter Goldring, M.P. and
Ms. Monique Guay, M.P. to take part in the International Election Observation
Mission (IEOM) of Azerbaijan’s parliamentary elections. The following report is
mainly based on the “Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions”, as
published by the IEOM on November 8, 2010. Composing the IEOM were OSCE Office
for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), the OSCE
Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA), the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe (PACE), and the European Parliament (EP).
About 400 short-term observers were
deployed as part of the IEOM, including a 56-member delegation from the OSCE
PA. In total, there were observers from 41 OSCE participating States. The IEOM
observed voting in some 1,100 polling stations out of a total of 5,175,
counting in 150 polling stations. The Mission was deployed at the invitation of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan, pursuant to
commitments made by all OSCE participating states.
While the November 7, 2010
parliamentary elections in the Republic of Azerbaijan were characterized by a
peaceful atmosphere and all opposition parties participated in the political
process, the conduct of these elections overall was not sufficient to
constitute meaningful progress in the democratic development of the country.
Overall, the Central Election
Commission (CEC) administered the technical aspects of the electoral process
well. However, limitations of media freedom and the freedom of assembly and a
deficient candidate registration process further weakened the opposition and
made a vibrant political discourse almost impossible. This and a restricted
competitive environment created an uneven playing field for candidates making
it difficult for voters to make an informed choice. On the positive side,
voters had the opportunity to check the centralized voter register and request
corrections or inclusion, and the CEC conducted a voter education campaign,
including in the media.
Voting on election day was assessed
positively in almost 90 per cent of the polling stations visited by observers,
whereas serious problems were noted in some 10 per cent. Counting deteriorated
with almost a third of the polling stations observed rated bad or very bad,
with worrying problems like ballot-stuffing noted in a number of places.
Negative aspects of the process
included:
-Domination of public and political life by one
party;
-The deficient candidate registration process at
the constituency level led to the registration of almost all nominated
candidates of the majority party and less than half of the opposition
candidates;
-Lack of balanced and absence of unbiased
reporting in the electronic media, resulting in an absence of alternative
views, scarcity of critical print media;
-Unresolved cases of imprisoned journalists;
-Unequal access of political parties to resources
necessary for effective campaigning;
-Allocation of unsuitable campaign venues and
prevention of political gatherings by opposition candidates outside of these
areas;
-Credible allegations of intimidation of voters
and candidates, and a misuse of administrative resources;
-Last-minute changes in legislation to shorten
the campaign period;
-Recommendations on legislation identified in
previous OSCE/ODIHR and Council of Europe Venice Commission reports remain
unaddressed;
-Continuation of the dominance of progovernment
forces in the election administration because of the formula for the
composition of election commissions;
-Legal remedies against decisions on
election-related complaints are often untimely and ineffective and lack legal
reasoning.
Positive aspects of the process
included:
-In a welcome departure from the past, the run up
to the elections and the voting day was peaceful and not marred with violent
incidents;
-All political parties participated in the
elections, in contrast to previous elections;
-All opposition members took their seats at the
CEC;
-The CEC held frequent open meetings, completed
all requirements within legal deadlines and elaborated regulations well in
advance;
-The CEC decided to allocate four minutes of
airtime in roundtable discussions on public TV to all candidates;
-Forty three of the 172 candidates who had been
denied registration and appealed, were reinstated;
-A very high number of international and domestic
observers were registered;
-International observers enjoyed good cooperation
with the CEC;
-Members of national minorities were represented
among candidates of all main political parties;
-The share of female candidates increased from 10
to 13 per cent compared to the last parliamentary elections.
The
Canadian delegation attended a briefing session in Baku on November 6 and
delegates were then deployed around Baku to observe the November 7 election.
All delegates were also able to attend the debriefing on November 8.
The full preliminary report prepared by the IEOM is available in
English at www.oscepa.org.
Respectfully submitted,
The Honourable Peter Goldring, M.P.
Director Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and
Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA)