From 28–30 June
2015, the Honourable Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P., Vice-Chair and Senator Paul
Massicotte, Vice-Chair led a delegation from the Canada–United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) to the eighth annual meeting of the
Southeastern United States-Canadian Provinces (SEUS-CP) Alliance in
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. The other member of the delegation was Mr.
Tarik Brahmi, M.P. The delegation was accompanied by Ms. June Dewetering,
Senior Advisor to the IPG’s Canadian Section.
THE EVENT
The SEUS-CP
Alliance is a trade- and investment-focused partnership among six southeastern
U.S. states – Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and
Tennessee – and seven Canadian provinces – Manitoba, New Brunswick,
Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island and
Quebec. The group was established in 2007 to serve as a forum through which
common interests in enhancing economic ties between the two regions could be
advanced.
The delegations,
which are often led by state governors and provincial premiers, include
business and industry leaders. At the eight annual meeting, the state and
provincial delegations were led by the following individuals:
·Alabama: Ed Castile, Deputy Secretary of
Commerce;
·Georgia: Casey Cagle, Lieutenant Governor;
·Manitoba: Rod Higgins, Manitoba Trade and
Investment;
·Mississippi: Malcolm White, Visit Mississippi;
·New Brunswick: Brian Gallant, Premier;
·Newfoundland and Labrador: Steve Kent, Deputy
Premier;
·North Carolina: John Loyack, Economic
Development Partnership of North Carolina;
·Nova Scotia: Stephen McNeil, Premier;
·Ontario: Monte Kwinter, Parliamentary Assistant
to the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade;
·Prince Edward Island: Wade MacLauchlan, Premier;
·Quebec: Jacques Daoust, Minister of the Economy,
Innovation and Exports;
·South Carolina: Henry McMaster, Lieutenant
Governor; and
·Tennessee: Randy Boyd, Department of Economics
and Community Development.
The ninth
annual meeting of the SEUS-CP Alliance will be held in September 2016 in
Nashville, Tennessee.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
This conference
was the sixth occasion on which members of the IPG’s Canadian Section have
attended an annual meeting of the SEUS-CP Alliance. In some sense, the SEUS-CP
Alliance is the eastern counterpart to the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region
and the Council of the Great Lakes Region, but with leadership and
participation by U.S. governors and Canadian premiers, as well as significant
private-sector involvement.
The IPG’s
Canadian Section continues to note the practical nature of the SEUS-CP
Alliance’s conference, and intends to attend future annual meetings in order to
continue its work in advocating Canadian interests, particularly with U.S.
governors and senior members of the executive branch.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
At the eighth
annual meeting of the SEUS-CP Alliance, more than 600 business-to-business
“matchmaking” meetings were held, and the following keynote speech and
roundtable/panel discussions occurred:
·Keynote: Robert K. Irving, J.D. Irving, Limited;
·Building the Economy of Tomorrow;
·The Relationship at Work;
·Cluster Workshop; and
·Private-Public Collaboration Models of Regional
Economic Development.
This report
summarizes the keynote speech, and presentations and discussions at the
roundtable/panel discussions.
KEYNOTE
Robert K.
Irving, J.D. Irving, Limited
·Commitment, perseverance and tenacity are
important for business success.
·Businesses should capitalize on their strengths,
compete “smartly” and “win” in today’s volatile world.
·If a business is not growing, it is losing
ground.
·Businesses should provide the desired products
at the expected level of quality to meet ever-changing customer needs;
everything starts with the customer.
·Businesses should differentiate themselves from
their competitors; for example, entrepreneurs should determine how to become
indispensable to customers, and identify ways in which they can uniquely meet
customer needs.
·Product quality can be improved through
innovation.
·Lower costs and improved efficiency will lead to
enhanced business prosperity.
·Barriers to trade should be lowered.
·As the world is always changing, it is important
to look toward the future with a view to managing economic and other risks,
being open to change and exploring new opportunities as they arise.
·Strong economies contribute to both strong
businesses and strong communities.
·Efforts should be directed to transforming
challenges into opportunities, and disadvantages – such as small size – into
advantages – such as the ability to make decisions quickly.
·Innovation and continuous improvement contribute
to future success.
·Canada and the United States should never take
their relationship for granted; opportunities between the two countries –
including between the provinces and states in the SEUS-CP Alliance – are
endless, and $1.4 million in trade crosses the shared border every minute.
·Governments should focus on ways to facilitate
business development and growth.
BUILDING THE ECONOMY OF TOMORROW
Louise
Blais, Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada
·Unlike Canadian and U.S. legislators, businesses
and people often do not understand the nature and extent of the bilateral
relationship and the two countries’ integrated economies.
·Canada and the United States should not take
each other for granted, and there is a need to guard against complacency.
·A mechanism to connect Canadian businesses to
U.S. businesses and to Canadian business operating in the United States is
needed.
·After a decade of pursuing opportunities in
other countries and regions, Canada should refocus on its relationship with the
United States.
·Canadian businesses are often “shy,” and should
be more aggressive in pursuing opportunities in the United States.
·North America needs strong and fully-developed
supply chains.
·Canadians are concerned about U.S.-initiated
barriers to trade, which prevent that country’s “number one customer” from
entering the U.S. marketplace; these barriers include Buy American provisions
in U.S. legislation and mandatory country-of-origin labelling requirements,
which affect businesses in both countries.
·There will always be “winners” and “losers” with
trade agreements; on balance, such agreements have a net benefit.
·For the most part, members of the U.S. Congress
understand the benefits of free trade, but recognize the need to assist
businesses and people as trade agreements are being implemented.
Steven Zate, U.S. Department of State
·The Canadian and U.S. economies are integrated
to a significant degree, and this reality needs to become better known.
·The Canada–U.S. relationship is large and
growing, and further expansion is possible.
·In public statements, the U.S. Ambassador to
Canada has said that his job is not only to expand the United States’ trade
with Canada, but also to expand Canada’s trade with the United States; with
this approach, both countries experience gains.
·The Beyond the Border and Regulatory Cooperation
Council initiatives between Canada and the United States are designed to enhance
the bilateral relationship; the border is one area in which the countries could
improve, and “thinning the border” is a “process” that will take time.
·As the nature of the economy is changing
rapidly, it is important that people with expertise are able to move easily
across the shared border so that both countries can benefit from that
expertise.
·The United States is looking to the future, and
trilateral cooperation among the North American Free Trade Agreement
countries will be important.
·The Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations are a
high priority for the U.S. Administration, and an agreement is expected
relatively soon; the parties to the negotiations comprise 800 million consumers
and 40% of global gross domestic product.
·The U.S. Administration is concerned about the
environment, and clean energy technologies present significant business
opportunities.
·Innovation is critically important to future
success.
·The world in which we live requires a security
consciousness.
·Immigration is an important issue, and must be
addressed with sensitivity.
THE RELATIONSHIP AT WORK
Marlene
Moore, Green Power Labs Inc.
·There are many opportunities for Canadian and
U.S. companies to “partner for growth,” and mechanisms that would allow
Canadian companies to identify partners – whether a U.S. business or a Canadian
business operating in the United States – should be increased.
·There is a need to enhance awareness of how
Canadian and U.S. companies can work together.
John Rowe, Island Abbey Foods
·Collaboration is the key to building businesses.
·Collaboration works best when all partners have
“skin in the game.”
·For businesses, it is important to find the
right partners with which to collaborate.
John Scannapieco, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
Berkowitz, PC
·The Beyond the Border initiative is important,
as is businesses’ ability to engage with universities, including in relation to
workforce development issues and research that can be commercialized.
·Governments need to establish a regulatory
environment that supports businesses; regional differences across provinces can
create barriers.
·While governments often provide export and trade
assistance, businesses are often unaware of the range of assistance that is
available to them.
·A regional focus is important; when one state or
province in a region prospers, there are positive impacts on other states and
provinces in the region.
·There is a need to focus on “what is next.”
·With government support, innovation will lead to
success.
CLUSTER WORKSHOP
Ifor
Ffowcs-Williams, Cluster Navigators Ltd.
·Clusters – or sectors of regional specialization
that are based on existing strengths – are a natural occurrence, and are the
building blocks of a modern economy.
·To develop a long-term competitive advantage,
public support should be focused on higher value-added and/or more innovative
businesses within existing clusters and at the interface of related clusters.
·International evidence clearly demonstrates that
businesses located in clusters are more competitive than similar businesses
located outside of clusters.
· A successful “clusters culture” embraces
simultaneous collaboration and competition, or “co-opetition.”
·This era is one of specialized companies and
specialized communities.
·Clusters should be cultivated as a tool for an
effective foreign direct investment strategy.
·In today’s global economy, businesses cannot “go
it alone”; they need to partner with other businesses and capitalize on
regional strengths.
·From a clusters perspective,
academic-to-academic linkages are important.
·When businesses co-locate, it is easier for them
to exchange information and to “cross-pollinate.”
·The strength of the clusters in a given
community is a key “driver” of wealth; governments should support and reinforce
clusters, which can increase regional competitiveness.
·Cluster-based public policy is characterized by
a focus on the following:
Øa perspective that is broader than a single
sector;
Øa specific geographic area;
Øcapitalizing on strengths;
Øsupport for public-private collaborations; and
Øcompetitiveness.
·In developing clusters, the key “ingredients for
success” include the following:
Øletting businesses lead;
Øensuring public support;
Øestablishing a culture of “co-opetition”; and
Øensuring a “knowledge underpinning.”
PRIVATE-PUBLIC COLLABORATION MODELS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Rory
Francis, Prince Edward Island BioAlliance
·Trust is key to successful public-private
collaborations.
·The “principles” of successful clusters include
the following:
Øa shared economic vision and commitment that
goes beyond self-interest, and that sets goals and develops strategies at the
level of the cluster;
Øshared active leadership, accountability,
collaboration and engagement;
Øa shared understanding that a cluster’s success
creates opportunities for all partners in the cluster;
Øtrust among cluster partners;
Øextensive and ongoing collaboration among
cluster partners;
Øa sharing of cluster-related wealth and credit
for success; and
Øthe existence of an over-arching organizational
structure.
·The business environment affects the success of
clusters.
Randall Johnson, North Carolina Biotechnology
Center
·Clusters require partnerships among legislators,
businesses and academia.
·Global connections contribute to the success of
clusters.
Jennifer Yun, Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce
·States/provinces and cities can differentiate
themselves by focusing on their clusters.
·Branding and establishing a reputation are
important.
Guy Viel, Marine Biotechnology Research Centre
·Clusters enable beneficial partnerships.
·Clusters enable access to information and
expertise, and perhaps access to financing.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson
Senator, Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group