From 9–11 June
2014, the Canadian Section of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary
Group (IPG) was represented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Western
Governors’ Association (WGA) by Senator Doug Black, Senator Percy Downe,
Mr. Massimo Pacetti, M.P. and Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, M.P. The meeting was held
in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The delegation was accompanied by Ms. June
Dewetering, Senior Advisor to the Canadian Section of the IPG.
THE EVENT
The Western Governors’
Association includes the governors from 19 U.S. western states (see the
Appendix), as well as from American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana
Islands. The Canadian premiers from British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and
Manitoba also participate in the WGA’s activities.
The WGA uses
six basic strategies to achieve its goals:
·develop and communicate regional policy;
·serve as a leadership forum;
·build regional capacity;
·conduct research and disseminate findings;
·form coalitions and partnerships in order to
advance regional interests; and
·build public understanding and support for
regional issues and policy positions.
Each year, the
WGA holds an annual meeting. This annual meeting was chaired by Colorado
Governor John Hickenlooper, who selected “We Go Altogether” as the WGA’s motto
for his year as WGA chair. Governors Jan Brewer (Arizona), Sam Brownback
(Kansas), Steve Bullock (Montana), Jack Dalrymple (North Dakota), Dennis
Daugaard (South Dakota), Gary Herbert (Utah), Matthew Mead (Wyoming), Butch
Otter (Idaho) and Brian Sandoval (Nevada) also attended the meeting, as did
Gary Doer, Canada’s Ambassador to the United States and former Premier of
Manitoba.
The 2015 annual
meeting will be chaired by Governor Sandoval, who has selected drought as a key
topic of interest for his year as WGA chair. The WGA’s vice-chair will be
Oregon Governor John Fitzhaber.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES
FOR THE EVENT
The Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group aims to find
points of convergence in respective national policies, to initiate dialogue on
points of divergence, to encourage the exchange of information, and to promote
better understanding among legislators on shared issues of concern.
In addition to
regular meetings with their federal counterparts, in recent years, members of
the Canadian Section of the IPG have attended national and regional meetings of
governors. At these events, Canadian delegates take the opportunity to engage
in conversations that will help achieve the Canadian Section’s objectives, and
to communicate the nature and scope of the bilateral relationship.
The Canadian
Section of the IPG intends to attend future annual meetings of the WGA and to
continue its work in advocating Canadian interests.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE
EVENT
During the 2014
annual meeting, the WGA held the following keynote addresses and discussions:
·Keynote: Secretary Sally Jewell, U.S. Department
of the Interior;
·Preparing for and Responding to Drought and
Flooding;
·Water in the West: Challenges and Opportunities;
·Keynote: Fred Hochberg, Export-Import Bank of
the United States;
·Keynote: Gina McCarthy, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency;
·The Washington Post’s Western Issues
Forum;
·The Impacts of Major Western Oil and Gas Finds:
Meeting Challenges and Capturing Opportunities; and
·Managing Inter-related Challenges of Wildfire,
the Endangered Species Act and Invasive Species.
This report
summarizes the addresses and discussions at the 2014 annual meeting.
KEYNOTE
Secretary Sally
Jewell, U.S. Department of the Interior
·“Putting things off” for another 10 years is not
an option.
·Governments must work together, and must do so
now.
PREPARING FOR AND
RESPONDING TO DROUGHT AND FLOODING
Jo-Ellen Darcy,
U.S. Department of Defense
·The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will prepare
for drought and flooding.
·To the extent possible, planning can have
significant impacts.
·The near- and long-term benefits and risks need
to be understood.
·Mitigation and adaptation are important.
·The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can help communities
plan to meet their water-related needs.
Kathryn Sullivan, U.S.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
·Forecasting “weather” is not the same thing as
forecasting “climate.”
·The drought in the U.S. West started earlier and
is likely to last longer than in previous years, and it is expected to affect
new areas; that said, there is some reduction in drought conditions in selected
areas.
·Conditions in the Pacific Ocean are favourable
for the development of an El Nino weather system.
·The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) helps states by informing them about weather, monitoring
weather to enable states to engage in long-term planning and working with state
agencies to identify needs.
·NOAA needs additional improvements in relation
to the delivery of information, and more data.
Robert Bonnie, U.S.
Department of Agriculture
·The agricultural sector is affected by droughts.
·The most recent Farm Bill contained new disaster
programs.
·Targeted funding to address drought exists.
·Proper tillage and land cover are important for
preventing erosion.
·Those with good conservation practices “do
better,” including in respect of soil health.
·Forest management needs to become more
drought-resilient.
WATER IN THE WEST:
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Mike Connor, U.S. Department of the
Interior
·Water plays a critical role in economic vitality
and the quality of life.
·In relation to water, stakeholders should ensure
better coordination that is “up front” and occurs early.
·The increasing focus on water provides
opportunities to develop and implement the strategies needed to meet water
challenges and to raise awareness; education and the ability to work together
are key opportunities.
·All levels of government are showing leadership
on water issues.
·Water is primarily the prerogative of the
states, a reality that is understood at the federal level; that said,
state-federal collaboration would be fruitful.
·There have been some successes regarding
improved water management, including in relation to Lake Mead and in
California.
·There is an imbalance between the demand for
water and the supply of water.
·There is an increasing demand for water,
including because of population growth, changes in energy markets and
agricultural needs.
·There are dwindling supplies of water, including
because of aquifer issues.
·In relation to water, coordinated strategies and
data to enable decision making are needed.
·Investments are required to address aging
water-related infrastructure, including in relation to storage, technology –
such as desalinization – needs to be deployed, and measures must be implemented
to protect against invasive species.
·The notion that an ounce of prevention is worth
a pound of cure is relevant in a range of areas, including water.
·Every conversation about water should begin with
conservation.
James Eklund, Colorado
Water Conservation Board
·Like many states in the U.S. West, Colorado’s
“story” is “written” in its water.
·Water-related conflicts “get the ink,” while
efforts directed at water-related collaboration do not “make a headline.”
·Much of the U.S. West is experiencing a severe
drought, with some areas recording the driest period in history.
·Drought requires states to be “nimble.”
·Some states have virtually no snow pack.
·States should work with the federal government
to ensure that water projects “happen” more quickly.
·Water systems do not respect state or
international boundaries.
John Entsminger,
Southern Nevada Water Authority
·There are benefits to considering water from a
regional perspective.
·Water is the lifeblood for people, businesses
and communities.
·There are “false divides” between and among
water uses, including recreation, commerce, agriculture, energy and consumers.
·It is possible to use less water and have robust
economic growth.
·When there is an imbalance between the demand
for water and the supply of water, there are three options: use less; get more;
and/or secure delivery mechanisms.
·In the U.S. West, there are few options for
increasing the water supply.
·In relation to water, adaptation strategies and
contingency plans are required.
KEYNOTE
Fred Hochberg,
Export-Import Bank of the United States
·The Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank of the United
States promotes a pro-growth agenda and functions in a manner that is
complementary to the private sector; in doing so, it undertakes such activities
as ensuring that businesses get paid and linking businesses – especially small
businesses – with foreign opportunities.
·With the support of the Ex-Im Bank, businesses
are able to compete with foreign companies on a more level playing field.
·Businesses pay a fee for the Ex-Im Bank’s
services, with taxpayers receiving any surplus monies.
·About 60 nations around the world have an
institution similar to the Ex-Im Bank; these other institutions may or may not
have to “fight for their existence” every few years and/or to “play by the same
rules” as the Ex-Im Bank.
KEYNOTE
Gina McCarthy,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
·On 2 June 2014, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a clean power plan.
·States in the U.S. West are involved in
interesting initiatives in relation to clean energy and conservation.
·Even if not identified as such, states and local
communities have been taking climate change-related actions for a long time.
·Record droughts in some areas are coincident
with record flooding in other areas.
·The urgency to act in relation to climate change
is very clear.
·A “one size fits all” solution in relation to
climate change is not appropriate, and states should be allowed to define for
themselves where they “want to be” in a 21st century clean energy
economy.
·The EPA supports flexibility and “putting states
in the driver’s seat”; that said, with flexibility comes responsibility.
·In the context of cooperative federalism in
relation to climate change, continuous engagement between federal and state
governments is needed; when there is agreement about what is needed to assure
public health, the environment and sustainability, the states should make the
decisions about the specific actions needed within the state.
·Climate risks should be turned into business
opportunities.
·In relation to climate change, the focus should
be on facts and on what matters to people.
·While a diverse, reliable and affordable energy
supply is important, so too is reducing carbon pollution.
·The U.S. West leads the nation in wind energy.
THE WASHINGTON POST’S
WESTERN ISSUES FORUM
Reid Wilson, of
the Washington Post, posed questions to Governors Bullock, Hickenlooper,
Mead and Sandoval.
Question: What would be the impact of the U.S. EPA’s 2 June 2014 proposed
rule to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal- and natural
gas-fired power plants?
Governor Mead
·The proposed rule would have adverse
implications for coal; the key question is how the country would be affected.
·Everyone has a shared interest in reducing
pollution.
·Innovation and technology should be the focus,
including how improvements can be made in relation to coal.
Governor Bullock
·It is widely understood that the climate is
changing, and it is widely perceived that there is a need to act.
·Coal is important to the U.S. West and to the
nation.
·What is known today will eclipse what will be
known tomorrow.
Governor Sandoval
·Nevada has a range of renewable sources of
energy, including solar and geothermal.
·Nevada Senate Bill 123 retires coal plants and
increases the focus on renewable energy.
Governor Hickenlooper
·In 2004, Colorado passed its first renewable
energy statute.
·Colorado has a wide range of energy sources.
Question: Is climate change a political “hot potato” or is it a settled
debate?
Governor Mead
·Every energy source has challenges.
·It is in everyone’s interest to have every
energy source as clean and efficient as possible.
Governor Bullock
·If there is the will and the capital, there will
be change.
·Federal, state and private investments will
change what the future looks like.
·Coal will always be part of the United States’
energy mix.
Governor Sandoval
·All states are dealing with the consequences of
climate change.
·Water must be conserved at the same time that
growth is enabled.
·At this point, the focus should be solutions,
rather than blame or causes.
Question: What comments are relevant in relation to wildfires in the U.S.
West?
Governor
Sandoval
·The major wildfires in recent years have had a
range of implications, including for sage grouse.
Governor Hickenlooper
·It is important to respond rapidly to each fire
risk as it occurs.
Governor Bullock
·Some states in the U.S. West have relatively
significant air assets, and aircraft are shared among states, as required.
Question: What comments are relevant in relation to drought in the U.S.
West?
Governor Sandoval
·About 84% of Nevada is federal land and,
thereby, federal responsibility.
·Drought will be a key WGA priority in 2015.
Governor Mead
·Significant funds are spent while fighting
fires.
·Governors of states in the U.S. West help each
other immediately and without question.
Question: How should states in the U.S. West prepare for floods?
Governor
Hickenlooper
·When rebuilding after a flood, it is important
to build in resiliency and to rebuild everything better.
Governor Bullock
·Disaster recovery should not be the only
priority; measures that can be taken to avoid future problems should also be a
focus.
Question: What comments are relevant in relation to sage grouse in the U.S.
West?
Governor Mead
·Some people are optimistic that sage grouse will
not become a listed species under the Endangered Species Act.
·Work on addressing sage grouse as an endangered
species is providing a useful paradigm for work on other issues.
·In relation to sage grouse, the states should
provide leadership.
Governor Sandoval
·States need to work together in protecting sage
grouse.
Governor Hickenlooper
·In relation to sage grouse, locally generated
solutions are needed.
·Sage grouse should be provided with every
possible support.
Governor Bullock
·In relation to sage grouse, state-developed
solutions are better than federal-imposed solutions.
·The focus should be developing sage
grouse-related solutions within each state.
Question: As the federal government owns much of the land in some states,
what is the impact on state policy?
Governor
Sandoval
·Given ownership of the state’s land, when a
problem arises in Nevada, the state has 16% of the problem and the federal
government has the remaining 84% of the problem.
·A collaborative relationship whereby the state
and federal governments work together is preferred.
Governor Hickenlooper
·Large-scale sales of federal lands are unlikely
to occur.
Governor Mead
·Each state must “live” within its means.
·States have great expertise in a number of
areas, and have a vested interest in “doing things right.”
·Federal land sales are unlikely to occur.
Question: What comments are relevant in relation to Medicaid expansion?
Governor
Bullock
·Medicaid expansion is leading to cost-shifting
onto those who have insurance, with impacts on hospitals, and
cross-subsidization across states.
Governor Mead
·Medicaid expansion has a “one size fits all”
approach, and is expensive.
Question: What comments are relevant in relation to the legalization of
marijuana in Colorado?
Governor Hickenlooper
·There are some concerns about access by children
to marijuana.
·Children do not believe the evidence indicating
the harm to one’s brain associated with marijuana use.
THE IMPACTS OF MAJOR
WESTERN OIL AND GAS FINDS: MEETING CHALLENGES AND CAPTURING OPPORTUNITIES
Al Walker,
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
·Oil and gas rigs have a significant multiplier,
with one rig leading to the creation of 100 jobs.
·Natural gas will be a significant contributor to
U.S. energy independence.
·It is possible to use both fossil fuels and
renewable energy sources.
Ben Fowke, Xcel Energy
·In order to have a secure energy future, aging
infrastructure must be replaced.
·Natural gas is a game-changer, and has enabled
the conversion of older, less efficient coal plants to natural gas plants.
·A focus should be the natural gas infrastructure
that will be needed for the future.
·While natural gas is affordable today, the
future is unpredictable; natural gas should be hedged with renewable energy
sources so that “not all eggs are in the same basket.”
·Natural gas will be increasingly important in
the future, but other energy sources are also relevant.
·The “right” regulation is needed.
Tom Petrie, Petrie
Partners
·Hydrocarbons are being “unlocked” from shale
gas.
·Going forward, a key issue will be how state and
federal regulatory oversight occur.
MANAGING INTER-RELATED
CHALLENGES OF WILDFIRE, THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND INVASIVE SPECIES
Janice Schneider, U.S.
Department of the Interior
·Open and continuing dialogue on such important
issues as fires, endangered species and invasive species is needed; open
communication and collaboration are critical for good decision making.
·Partnerships are critically important in order
to move forward in an extremely productive manner.
·Invasive species are extremely challenging;
approaches that will have the largest impacts should be identified and, as no
one can “do it alone,” volunteers should be part of the team addressing invasive
species.
·The prevalence of non-native species has changed
the nature and extent of fires.
·Restoration, such as re-seeding, should occur as
quickly as possible following a fire.
·Fires are a threat to sage grouse habitat.
·There is a need for a comprehensive strategy to
increase operational effectiveness in relation to sage grouse habitat.
·Efforts should be directed to avoiding having
sage grouse listed under the Endangered Species Act.
Jim Hubbard, U.S.
Forest Service
·At present, there are concerns about fires in a
number of states in the U.S. West, including California, Oregon, Nevada and
Idaho.
·Climatic conditions in the U.S. West are
unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
·Droughts are leading to longer fire seasons.
·Collaboration among stakeholders and on a
regional basis is needed in order to address fires.
·A failure to act leads to risk being transferred
to another time and place.
·Communities are developing fire protection
plans.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group