From 21-23 February 2009, Senator Jerry
Grafstein, Co-Chair, and Mr. Dean Del Mastro, Acting Co-Chair, led a delegation
of the Canadian Section of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group
(IPG) to the winter meeting of the National Governors Association (NGA) in Washington, D.C. The delegation included Senator Janis Johnson, Vice-Chair, as well as
Mr. Guy André, M.P., Vice-Chair, the Honourable Scott Brison, P.C., M.P., Mr.
Mark Holland, M.P., Mr. Brian Masse, M.P., Vice-Chair and Mr. Brad Trost, M.P.,
Vice-Chair. The theme for the NGA’s activities this year – including the
February winter and July summer meetings – is "Strengthening our
Infrastructure for a Sustainable Future," which was selected by Governor
Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania, the NGA Chair for this year.
Founded 100 years ago when President
Theodore Roosevelt gathered state governors in order to discuss the nation’s
resources, the NGA is the collective voice of US governors from the 50 states,
three territories and two commonwealths. It is also a public policy
organization that represents the governors on Capitol Hill and before the US
Administration on federal issues that affect them, and that develops and
implements solutions to public policy challenges.
The NGA is supervised by a chair,
vice-chair and nine-person executive committee, and governors participate on
four standing committees – Economic Development and Commerce; Education, Early
Childhood and Workforce; Health and Human Services; and Natural Resources – as
well as on special ad hoc, bipartisan task forces.
At this meeting, each of the four
standing committees held a session, and there were a number of plenary
sessions. In particular, the meeting included the following sessions:
·Opening Plenary Session: Infrastructure Matters
and Energy Infrastructure for the 21st Century
·Miller Center Discussion and Debate about Infrastructure
·Economic Development and Commerce Committee:
Update on Foreclosure Issues
·Education, Early Childhood and Workforce
Committee: Transforming the Workforce System – Upskilling American Workers
·Health and Human Services Committee: Health Care
Reform
·Natural Resources Committee: Energy
Infrastructure – Vital for a 21st Century Economy
·Special Session: Innovative Infrastructure
Financing, Accountability and Sustainability
·Closing Plenary Session: International
Infrastructure Best Practices: Ideas for Governors.
Members of the IPG have been attending
the winter and summer meetings of the NGA for several years. At this winter
meeting, Canadian delegates were able to continue their dialogue with governors
on issues of Canadian and/or joint interest, including the Buy American
provisions in the US stimulus package, enhanced driver’s licences, border
crossings, bilateral energy trade and trade in softwood lumber. In particular,
discussions were held with the 33 governors listed in Appendix A.
Their interactions with governors
enable Canadian members of the IPG to better achieve the aim of finding points
of convergence in respective national policies, initiate dialogue on points of
divergence, encourage exchanges of information and promote better understanding
on shared issues of concern. Moreover, the NGA meetings provide the IPG with an
important means to provide input to, and gather information about, state-level
issues that affect Canada. It is anticipated that the IPG’s attendance at the
winter and summer meetings will continue.
This report summarizes the main points
that were made in the plenary and selected standing committee sessions.
Opening Plenary Session: Infrastructure
Matters
Dr. Frank Luntz, The Word Doctors
·regardless of age, gender, region, political
affiliation, etc., the American people desperately want infrastructure to
"work"
·the public sees infrastructure as a right,
rather than as privilege
·accountability is important, and the American
people would rather it be done "right" than done "fast"
·the broader the definition of infrastructure,
the greater the support for it
·energy infrastructure is felt to be relatively
more important than roads and highways
·"process" matters to the American
people and, for them, how you fix infrastructure is as important as what you
fix
·Americans will pay more for better
infrastructure, as evidenced by a survey results indicating that 81% of
surveyed respondents would support a 1 percentage point tax increase for
infrastructure
·for Americans, the highest priorities are
accountability and transparency, and they want funds to be spent wisely, and
projects to be completed on time and on budget
·the public wants change
Opening Plenary Session: Energy
Infrastructure for the 21st Century
T. Boone Pickens, BP Capital Management
·Americans do a lot, but they get little credit
for what they do
·the Pickens Plan was launched in July 2008
·almost 70% of the oil used in the US is imported, and the US needs to reduce its dependence on foreign oil
·with 4% of global population, the US uses 25% of the oil produced worldwide each day
·the US is a disproportionate user of the global
oil supply, and the fact that the US is highly industrialized does not matter
to some people
·with a focus on renewable energy, including wind
and solar, the US could become energy independent
·if the US taxed gasoline in the same manner as
the European Union, many more Americans would be driving smaller cars
·natural gas is clean, inexpensive, abundant and
American, and natural gas for heavy-duty transportation must be the goal
·at this time, energy is a relatively more
important issue than is the financial crisis
John W. Rowe, Exelon Corporation
·renewable portfolio standards, a cap-and-trade
system, etc. are under consideration
·natural gas should be used to make electricity
·the price of an avoided tonne of carbon is $10,
while the price of wind power is $70
·while a cap-and-trade system may be the best
option for trying to price carbon, a carbon tax is a good option too
·energy problems cannot be addressed on a
piecemeal basis
·climate change and energy issues must be
addressed
·the US stimulus package gives states special
opportunities to make smart energy choices
·smart meters, which give consumers more control,
should be promoted
·more and better transmission are needed
·a diverse energy supply is needed, including
coal and nuclear energy, with a continued focus on energy that is as clean as
it can be
·ideally, conservation is the best thing that we
could be doing
Miller Center Discussion and Debate
about Infrastructure
Governor Ed Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania
·while the US stimulus package is a good first
step, it is barely 5% of the $2.2 trillion that is needed to meet the nation's
infrastructure needs
·the US stimulus package was not focused on the
concept of a long-term infrastructure plan
·a 5-10 year infrastructure plan is needed, and
such an initiative would produce jobs, economic growth, higher levels of
safety, a greater quality of life and enhanced competitiveness
·when spending infrastructure funds,
accountability and transparency must be key priorities
·since funding requirements are significant,
there is a need for creativity in how money is spent and infrastructure is built
·the selection process, or what gets done and at
what cost, should be taken out of the hands of politicians
·since the US stimulus package's timelines are
tight and funding is "use it or lose it," a state may not be able to
build a new highway but it can repair an existing highway
·demonstration projects are not needed when
countries around the world are already doing it
·the next big investment in infrastructure is
likely to occur next year with re-authorization of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), and if the status quo prevails
with the re-authorization, “we are cooked”
·according to survey results, 81% of Americans
would pay 1 percentage point more in taxes in support of investments in
infrastructure
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of California
·infrastructure is not a political issue
·in order to ensure that Americans are
enthusiastic about infrastructure, the issue needs to be marketed properly,
including through making the issue relevant to people's daily lives
·worldwide, many countries are developing
high-speed rail
·land use and smart growth must be considered
·the US stimulus package is not perfect, but it
is good
·infrastructure repair and construction create
jobs
·a national "master plan" with the
correct funding mechanisms is needed
·all infrastructure investments create jobs
·one measure of "economic power" is the
speed with which goods and people are moved around the state
·a portion of the budget should be set aside for
infrastructure
·since everything cannot be done with public
funds, private-public partnerships should be considered
·people in America should demand that their
nation be rebuilt
Douglas I. Foy, DIF Enterprises
·ultimately, many of the most important
infrastructure decisions are made by governors
·the US stimulus package provides perhaps a
once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make the right decisions
·a national infrastructure agenda or strategy is
needed
·every infrastructure dollar must be spent
carefully
·as a first priority, repair of existing
infrastructure should be considered
·all transportation modes should be treated
equally
·silos among infrastructure-related agencies must
be dismantled
·transparency regarding how infrastructure
projects are selected and how infrastructure funds are spent must exist
·infrastructure should be repaired where people
and communities already exist
·the urban sprawl that harms the environment can
be avoided if an economy is grown around an infrastructure framework that
already exists
·the US stimulus package has allocated significant
funds for transit
·the funds in the US stimulus package are
basically transportation-mode-neutral
·80% of all trips taken in the US are for errands rather than for work
·smart-growth strategies are needed at the state
and local levels
·a "fix it first" strategy will lead to
timely job creation, since no time is wasted getting permits, etc.
·the US has fallen behind other countries, and
while much of what is needed has been built, it has fallen into disrepair
·legislation and a "czar," or something
like it, are need to ensure coordination across departments and agencies and at
both the state and federal levels
·a state cannot have a housing agenda without
also having a transportation agenda
JayEtta Hecker, The Bipartisan Policy Center
·the focus is not "improving the national
transportation policy," but rather "getting a national transportation
policy"
·the ways in which funds are raised and
distributed involve moral hazard issues
·the infrastructure financing system is broken,
with the result that the wrong signals are being sent to users and owners
·clear, national infrastructure goals are needed,
and federal funds disbursed to the states should have performance results
attached to them
·a new federal-state compact for infrastructure
is needed
·decisions about infrastructure should be
depoliticized
·at the present time, users are paying only part
of the cost of infrastructure
·the national interests in respect of
transportation need to be articulated
·strategic investments are required
·it is possible to build political trust provided
there are performance goals
·while some believe that the target is job
creation, jobs are the worst possible proxy of the kinds of strategic,
performance-based investments that are needed
·legislation is needed in order to institutionalize
infrastructure as a national priority
·although much can be learned from other
countries, it is important to recognize that they have made the tough choices
that are appropriate for them
·a more accurate user-pay model that considers
environmental and other costs should be considered
Education, Early Childhood and
Workforce Committee: Transforming the Workforce System – Upskilling American
Workers
Steven Lockard, TPI Composites
·work-life balance should be a priority, as
should be the creation of green jobs
·green jobs can be created in respect of wind
energy
·wind energy is now part of the mainstream, and
is an affordable, emissions-free energy source
·there is so much more that can be done in
respect of wind energy, but the financial crisis has made financing relatively
unavailable
·wind-energy-specific skilled workers need to be
educated and trained
·governments need to support the growth in wind
energy and the jobs that would be created as a result
Pamela Passman, Microsoft Corporation
·employees should upgrade and retrain on an
ongoing basis in order to keep their knowledge “fresh”
·the US needs to be at the forefront of emerging
technologies
·an employee earns $100 more per week, on
average, if he or she uses a computer at work, and $118 more per week, on
average, if he or she uses email and the internet at work
·it is important to identify correctly the needs
of employers and the marketplace as training requirements are being developed
·the qualifications and training of teachers
should be improved
·the Microsoft Corporation is partnering with
private, public and community organizations in respect of its Elevate America
initiative, which will provide up to 2 million people, over the next three
years, with the technology training need for the 21st century
Economic Development and Commerce
Committee: Update on Foreclosure Issues
Governor Gregoire, Governor of Washington
·the economic crisis started with foreclosures in
the housing market, and conditions in the housing market are continuing to
deteriorate
·the state of Washington is taking a
three-pronged approach to help address the housing crisis:
Øenhanced funding commitments
Øaccess to low-cost financing for selected homeowners
Øfunding to help at-risk homeowners modify their mortgages
·counselling is available for homeowners
Governor Corzine, Governor of New Jersey
·New Jersey has implemented a number of measures
to address the housing crisis, including:
Ømediation in foreclosure
Øa loan modification program for selected homeowners
Øwork with community organizations to purchase homes that are in
foreclosure
Governor Perdue, Governor of North Carolina
·North Carolina has a loan modification program
housed within the Commissioner of Banks, as well as a voluntary arbitration
process
Governor Baldacci, Governor of Maine
·in Maine, community banks are well-regulated and
should be a big part of the solution to the mortgage “mess”
Natural Resources Committee: Energy
Infrastructure – Vital for a 21st Century Economy
Pat Wood III, Wood3 Resources
·regarding energy, there are a variety of
production, delivery and efficiency issues that should be examined
·the US has a supply of coal that is predicted to
last for more than two centuries
·major strides have been made in reducing
coal-related emissions, but continued work is needed
·the costs of carbon capture and storage are
uncertain
·in some respects, public policy is getting ahead
of technology
·there are a range of energy sources available,
including oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, tidal, biofuels and
geothermal
·oil production is characterized by cost
volatility
·with natural gas, there is a “huge” amount of
price volatility
·in the US, there has not been a new nuclear
plant built since the 1990s, and these plants involve a significant upfront
cost
·nuclear, wind and solar energy are likely to
power electricity at the end of the century
·in some parts of the US, including the mid-West
and the West, there is rapid growth in wind energy, and this type of energy is
optimized if good wind and good transmission exist
·solar energy is available almost everywhere in
the US, and utility-scale solar energy facilities are being built
·regarding biofuels, the focus should be on the
use of non-foodstock sources
·with natural gas transmission, the division
between the roles of the federal and state governments is unclear
Jesse Berst, GlobalSmartEnergy.com
·funds in the US stimulus package will have
multiplier effects
·a Smart Grid has climate, environmental and
national security benefits
·the US is moving to an electricity economy
·no significant changes have been made to the
electricity grid since Thomas Edison, and investments to maintain and innovate
the grid have not been made
·as goes the electricity grid, so goes the
ability to integrate renewable energy sources and to grow
·one of the best predictors of economic
prosperity is the condition of the electricity grid
·every other industry has gone digital except the
one on which all of the others rely: electricity
·with a Smart Grid, there are vulnerabilities to
blackouts, outages, rising rates and attacks
·smart energy will be the next great industry as
well as the foundation for future prosperity
·a Smart Grid costs more upfront, but it pays for
itself over its lifetime
·key considerations regarding a Smart Grid
include:
Øregional and state-level “Smart Grid roadmaps”
Øinteroperability
Øthe transmission of pricing information regarding timing and
location
Øthe development of a policy that rewards the “right things”
Øregular progress and reporting on results
Special Session: Innovative
Infrastructure Financing, Accountability and Sustainability
Bruce Katz, Brookings Institution
·infrastructure is a key solution to the US’
economic, energy, environmental and prosperity challenges
·following many years of neglect, there is a need
to invest in, and reform, the current system of infrastructure
·there are three reasons to use funds for
infrastructure: jobs, jobs, jobs
·consumers should be assisted in managing their
energy consumption
·consideration should be given to a national or
regional infrastructure bank or corporation, bearing in mind that more than
thirty states have state infrastructure banks
·a significant proportion of the infrastructure
in the US is crumbling before our eyes, and the design of some infrastructure
is becoming obsolete
·fuel is being wasted as a result of traffic
congestion, and water is being wasted as a result of leaky pipes
·notwithstanding the recent commitments to
infrastructure in the US stimulus package, the federal response has been
inadequate
·a bold, long-term vision for the nation’s
infrastructure future is needed, and with transparency and accountability as
key guiding principles
·the federal government should focus on
preserving interstate highways, developing a comprehensive plan for moving
between urban centres and multi-modal freight movement; for everything else,
the federal government should yield to state governments
·land use, housing, environmental concerns,
transportation, etc. should be integrated
·there is a pervasive lack of data-gathering and
analysis across programs, and silos are also problematic
·the US needs to learn from other countries
·it is more important to "get it right"
than to "get it quick"
·in going forward, it is important to:
Ømeasure what matters
Øtrack what counts
Øget what we pay for
Ambassador Felix Rohatyn, FGR Associates LLC
·regarding the current financial crisis, there is
lots of blame to go around
·at least in part, the current financial crisis
is the result of inexpensive and ample credit, excessive leveraging and rampant
speculation
·with four out of five Americans willing to pay
more to get the infrastructure that is needed, the key question is how to get
them to pay more
·there is a need to consider not only what is
shovel-ready, but also what is shovel-worthy
·federal funds should be invested consistently
and rationally
·a more prosperous future awaits the US if the right decisions and investments are made now
Parris Glendening, Governors’ Institute on Community Design
·out of crisis comes opportunity
·there is a need to reposition the nation and the
states for the new economy that is emerging
·the US’ transportation system is broke as well
as broken
·in the US, additional small stimulus packages
are likely
Closing Plenary Session:
International Infrastructure Best Practices–Ideas for Governors
Dr. Robert Atkinson, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
·digital infrastructure is important, as is hard
or physical infrastructure
·while the US used to be a leader in
infrastructure, it is now lagging
·the US’ infrastructure is aging, and older
infrastructure is relatively more costly to repair
·the view held by some Americans that their
infrastructure is “good enough” is not good enough
·the US has systematically underinvested in
infrastructure
·other nations have:
Øinvested more
Øembraced innovation to a relatively greater extent
Øused private-public partnerships
Øcollected more from users, including through tolls and congestion
pricing as well as other direct user fees
·while gas taxes are not the total answer, they
do have a role to play
·lessons learned include:
Ødevelop priorities
Ødetermine the best way to fund priorities
Ørely more on direct user fees in order to have more efficient usage
Øuse private-public partnerships
Øensure that regulation supports investment
Øcommunicate priorities, etc. to the public
Connie Hedegaard, Danish Minister of Climate & Energy
·the financial crisis has turned out to be more
severe, complex and global than initially thought
·the financial crisis has led us to question the
core structure on which we have based our societal foundations
·as we re-think the way we shape our societies
and economies, we must “think green”
·new synergies between transportation and energy
are possible because of the opportunities provided by the financial crisis
·Denmark is trying to
connect its grid with neighbouring countries
·wind power can be used more efficiently when it
can be stored in batteries
·while transportation is critical for modern
life, it contributes to greenhouse gas emissions
·in Denmark, two-thirds of the people who go from
the nation’s capital to the second-largest city prefer to use public transit
·public transit is part of Denmark’s overall plan for greener transportation
·electric cars are a promising alternative that
would assist in the transition from fossil to greener fuels
·a more diversified energy portfolio is needed in
order to keep prices down
·in Denmark, all household waste is being turned
into energy
·market-based policies and incentives should be
used to foster demand for the right types of technology
·green growth pays off, and Denmark has the data to prove this assertion
·continuing to do "business as usual"
is no longer an option
Respectfully submitted,
Hon.
Jerahmiel Grafstein, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord
Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group