The Canadian Section of ParlAmericas attended the
Annual Gathering of the ParlAmericas Group of Women Parliamentarians, entitled
“Women in Power: Recent Changes in the Political Arena” focused on the
leadership and political participation of women and the progress made in these
areas in the Americas in recent years. The Canadian parliamentary
delegation was led by Ms. Susan Truppe, M.P., and was accompanied by the
Honourable Suzanne Fortin-Duplessis, Senator, Ms. Djaouida Sellah, M.P. ,
and Ms. Guyanne L. Desforges, Association Secretary to the Canadian
Section.
Held annually, the meeting has grown steadily in
popularity in recent years and underscores the continued importance and relevance
of strengthening the roles of women in Parliament and society. The Group
includes representatives from each sub-region in the Americas, namely, North
America, Central America, South America and the Caribbean. The objectives of
the 2013 Annual Gathering were to discuss achievements in the political
participation of women, the passing of laws related to women’s rights, female
leadership in the region, and to propose actions to maintain and further
progress. A total of 53 parliamentarians, 38 women and 15 men, from 23
countries attended the 2013 Annual Gathering.
THE MEETING
Opening Ceremony
The Gathering began with several inaugural
addresses. Ms. Jennifer Simmons, Speaker of the National Assembly of Suriname,
Acting President of the Group of Women Parliamentarians (GoWP) and host of the
Annual Gathering opened the meeting with welcoming remarks. She expressed her
gratitude to the parliamentarians and experts present and voiced her happiness
at the large attendance at the Annual Gathering. She shared her hope that the
Gathering will provide an opportunity to exchange ideas and would serve as
inspiration to parliamentarians to continue their work on issues related to
women’s rights and the representation of women in Parliament, and in national
decision making processes.
A video address followed with Ms. Linda Machuca
Moscoso, Representative of the National Assembly of Ecuador, and President of
the ParlAmericas Group of Women Parliamentarians. She reflected on the value
of providing such a forum to women and men and the importance of the
discussions that would be held. Ms. Machuca Moscoso recognized that much
progress has been made in the past one hundred years and noted that legislation
for gender equality and equity, based on the human rights of both men and
women, help build democracies in the hemisphere, respect the Rule of Law and
build a world of peace and solidarity.
Following Ms. Machuca, Mrs Monica Zalaquett,
Member of the Chamber of Deputies of Chili and Secretary to the Group of the
Women Parliamentarians welcomed all delegates and recognized the achievements
that have been made in closing the gaps in education, political inclusion in
electoral processes, and the integration of women into the workforce. However,
she noted there are still many grey areas and problems such as violence against
women and children, human trafficking, enslavement and sexual exploitation
which continue to plague societies. She acknowledged that women’s roles have
become crucial in assuring that development processes be inclusive of all
citizens of our countries, and that we move from words to actions and proposals
to facts.
Session 1— Women Presidents of National
Legislatures
The objective of the first session was to analyze
the experiences of women who have reached formal positions of power, and to
share lessons learned in the hope that they will be used as an example and as
inspiration to other female politicians. The session also sought to highlight
the importance of having women exercise formal politics from a female
perspective without resorting to traditional, patriarchal models. This session
examined the struggle of groups committed to gender equality, as well as other
factors that have contributed to progress, how progress can be stepped up, how
changes can be measured, and the results of such an evaluation.
Two female Speakers of Parliament: Dr. Jennifer
Simons, Speaker of the National Assembly of Suriname and Gisele
Isaac-Arrindell, Speaker of the House of Representatives of Antigua and Barbuda
were the main presenters. They spoke on their experiences to shed light on the
challenges that women face when entering politics. They focused on why female
leadership is necessary, and strategies for increasing women’s presence in
positions of political power.
Speaker Simons made the participants reflect on
the importance of having more women in politics as they make up half of any
society and therefore must be present in all decision making processes. She
stated that increased involvement of women in politics and in decision making
roles adds to the quality of democracies and societies, and helps address the
lack of sustainability in political and economic systems. Increased female
perspective in Parliament is necessary to improve governance and to adjust the
present economic model that is currently centred on maximizing gains and
growth, so that space is made for other issues such as the environment.
Speaker Isaac-Arrindell followed by stating that
women comprise 50% of the population but only one woman has ever been elected
to the House of Parliament in Antigua and Barbuda. As appointed Speaker, her
role is important as it gives women the visibility they need and reminds men
that the inclusion of women is crucial to the success of democracy. There are
still many psychosocial and financial barriers to overcome and it’s important
to continue to encourage young educated women towards leadership roles and the
need for more activism by women of all ages and backgrounds. She suggests that
women who are in the position to inform and educate must work towards closing
the knowledge gap.
Regional rapporteurs from Canada, Mexico,
Nicaragua and Paraguay addressed the strategies that have been followed in
their countries that effectively prevent women from reaching the highest
position in Parliament.
Susan Truppe (Canada) explained that in Canada,
there are no rules, laws or institutional barriers that prohibit women from
being candidates for Speaker of the House of Commons. She noted, however, that
in reality, women continue to be
under-represented in key decision making roles in politics and business in
Canada. She commented that all Canadians benefit when women and girls are full
participants in every aspect of daily life, from the grassroots level all the
way to the boardroom, and including government at every level. She informed the
group that there was increased funding for the Women’s Program at Status of
Women Canada to its highest level ever, supporting more than 600 projects at
the community level. More than $21 million in funding has been approved for
projects to promote women’s leadership and democratic participation. She added
that through Status of Women Canada, the government is supporting projects that
engage young women and girls in being leaders from the start.
Delfina Elizabeth Guzmán Díaz (Mexico) informed
that a third of the positions in the bicameral legislative Congress of Mexico
are occupied by women, thanks to the legal obligation that was the subject of a
two-decade struggle requiring political parties to aim for 40% of its members
to be women. However she stated that quotas are not enough; the presence of
women in leadership positions, in addition to being a fundamental part of
gender-related justice, increases the probability that women’s priorities will
be present in decision making at the national level, will inspire other women
to strive for these positions, and will motivate men and women to bring forward
the agenda for gender equality as a central axis of democracy.
Martha González Dávila (Nicaragua) explained that
40.2% of the National Assembly of Nicaragua is composed of women. In 2012, the
Municipal Law was reformed at the initiative of the Executive branch so that
50% of electoral lists are represented by women. Despite all these advances,
women continue to face many challenges, such as lack of consciousness about
defending and promoting women’s rights; discrimination from certain groups or
sectors that block the emergence of female leaders, such as political parties,
religious groups, and even certain feminist groups; and insufficient technical,
professional, and political training for women.
Ms. González Dávila acknowledged that the
government and the National Assembly have approved laws to promote programs
with economic impacts such as production, food, and credit packages, and zero
usury programs. These have improved women’s productive and purchasing
capacities and have also contributed to a reduction in poverty levels.
Clarissa Marín de Lopez (Paraguay) explained that
the political participation of women in Paraguay is very recent. In the history
of Paraguay, women have only attained the position of Vice-President of the
Chamber. She emphasized that change has to occur not only at the legal level,
but also at the cultural level. She described existing challenges such as the
need for greater women’s empowerment, political party openness, financing for
women’s candidates, shared family responsibilities, and women’s own commitment.
Key elements to ensure the consistency of changes and to avoid moving backward
are training, negotiation, activism within political parties, and a service
vocation.
The assembly was then invited to ask questions,
comment on the information presented and to share experiences and practices
from their countries.
Session 2—Leadership and Political Participation
of Women of African Descent
The objective of this session was to reflect on
areas in which legislation recognizes the double discrimination against women
of African descent and to support their struggle for space within women’s
movements. The session also sought to bring a discussion on the implications
of positive discrimination for the Afro-descendant community. In general,
significant progress has been made in Latin America in incorporating women into
formal politics. However, there are strong indications that the situation of
Afro-descendant women has not improved to the same extent as for other women in
the region. The expert for this session was asked to reflect on how the
leadership roles, styles, and traditions among women of African descent are
constructed, and what strategies can be used to develop a political vision that
can place their specific and strategic demands on the national and
international agenda.
Beatriz Ramírez Abella, Director of the National
Women’s at the Institute of Uruguay (INMUJERES) since 2010 made a presentation
and her analysis focused more specifically on the contribution made by
Afro-descendant men and women in the fight for integration, inclusion and
equality. She gave a history from slavery to the new conception of the
multiple forms of discrimination (racism, religious, gender, generation,
cultural, social and political). It was noted that the Afro-descendants and
indigenous populations have been the largest minority and one of the poorest
population groups. Various statistical charts were presented showing the labour
market activity; employment and unemployment rate by gender and ethno-racial
group; Afro-descendant and non-Afro-descendant employed population distribution
by occupation and gender; attendance at educational institutions by age group
and average income with the Afro-descendant and Non-Afro-descendant population.
Ms Ramirez Abella informed the participants that
the National Women’s Institute (Instituto Nacional de las Muyeres)
created a department to address Afro-descendant women’s issues, to promote
gender and racial equality and to encourage actions to make gender and
racial/ethnic equality a cross-cutting issue in government agencies.
Additionally, affirmative actions such as providing training or designing
diploma courses on race and gender with universities are being encouraged.
Others include quotas for Afro-descendant youngsters through the law on youth
employment, and a bill on affirmative actions for the Afro-descendant
population to be submitted to the Senate. This constitutes an historical
milestone in the recognition of their rights in the fields of labour and
education. Finally she informed that work is currently under way to set up an
African Affairs Embassy in Uruguay.
The regional rapporteurs were: Angélica de la Peña
Gómez (Mexico), Valdez San Pedro; (Dominic Republic – Guadalupe); Vernella
Alleyne-Toppin (Trinidad and Tobago) and Marcela Revollo Quiroga (Bolivia).
They reflected on the session topic in light of the situation in their
respective countries.
Ms. Angélica de la Peña Gómez (Mexico) expressed
her belief that a nation’s legal framework is the backbone of its democracy,
which is why a country’s legislation must be concordant with its adoption of international
treaties on human rights. In Mexico, there is legislation that prevents and
sanctions discrimination, and which recognizes that people of African descent,
similarly to indigenous peoples, suffer multiple forms of discrimination,
including discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, gender, age, religion, and
economic status.
Ms. de la Peña Gómez insisted that those in charge
of guaranteeing the implementation of the law be held accountable. She called
on fellow parliamentarians to reflect on the actions they have taken as women
in positions of power to help improve the situation of other women in their
societies. Finally, Ms. de la Peña Gómez called for legislation that promotes
the representation of indigenous groups and Afro-descendant groups in
parliament.
Ms. Guadalupe Valdez San Pedro (Dominican
Republic) noted that in Latin America, censuses show that only 1% of all
legislators are of African descent and only 0.03% are women of African descent.
The reality is completely different from the discourse on equality in
constitutions and equality of opportunity in laws. She called for integrated
public policy with a focus on equality of opportunity that will render these
women visible. Public policy has to take into account these populations in the
areas of health, education and agriculture. Mrs.Valdez San Pedro states that
the struggle of women of African descent be linked with the struggle for
education, climate change, and food security so that a legislative agenda can
be created that includes legal frameworks to guarantee equality of opportunity
through concrete actions.
Ms. Vernella Alleyne-Toppin (Trinidad and Tobago)
informed participants that in the Caribbean, independence has sharpened the
contradictions in gender relationships. While blacks now enjoy political power,
few black women enjoy this same power. She further noted that once elected or
appointed to Parliament, female Members of Parliament face additional barriers
and limitations to their equal participation in political decision making. The
political barriers include the historical domination of politics and the
political environment by the male gender, and the traditional political power
structure and its bias against women. Also she noted the cultural and economic
barriers which include the perception of women’s subordination to male control
and the necessity of male “permission” to participate in public life; the lack
of support from the family (emotional and sharing of domestic
responsibilities); the burden of having to successfully manage domestic
responsibilities and professional obligations and the lack of adequate
financial support.
Ms. Marcela Revollo Quiroga (Bolivia) asserted
that the American identity is strongly marked by the presence of people of
African descent, which count for a population of 150 million. She noted,
however, that this massive presence has not translated into their effective
inclusion in political, economic, and social decision making processes in most
countries. This reality is exacerbated when it comes to women of African
descent, whose experience of exclusion, subordination and access to public
services is even worse.
Ms. Revollo Quiroga stated that countries such as
Bolivia have approved and incorporated into their constitutions the “Law
Against Racism and All Forms of Discrimination”. She noted, however, that
the large percentage of indigenous populations has been the centre of almost
all the interest of the government and of social institutions. Therefore,
incorporating women of the Americas into the political agenda implies shifting
our focus to the poorest women who are almost absent from public policy and who
do not receive social and cultural recognition. In order to recognize women of
African descent in countries where they are a minority, it is necessary to
analyze the hierarchized conception with which female politicians look at the
women’s agenda without identifying those women who suffer multiple forms of
discrimination.
The discussion continued with the comments and
reflections from the assembly.
Session 3 — The Effects of
Women’s Participation in Politics
The objective of this session was to discuss
progress in the drafting of laws made possible by the participation of women in
politics and the specific characteristics of their participation, and to
analyze the contribution of women’s participation in raising awareness on
issues related to gender and women’s rights. The growing presence of women
legislators in the Americas has not only produced visible progress in the kind
of laws being enacted but also in the will to include a gender approach in
existing laws.
The invited expert, Ms. Cynthia Barrow Giles
(Saint Lucia),a Senior Lecturer in Politics from the University of the West
Indies, started this last session with her presentation; “Women’s Political
Representation in the Commonwealth Caribbean and
Latin America – A Preliminary Analysis”.
The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of
Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) regards 33% as the critical mass of women
required for meaningful decision making. By 2008, 24 countries surpassed the
30% target. In the Caribbean, only Guyana, under its proportional
representation system, comes close to this goal. Ms. Barrow Giles stated that
given the present configuration and composition of parliaments in the
Commonwealth Caribbean, women acting in their own spaces have been unable to
exercise or exert much leverage with regards to the myriad of issues that
require action. At a political level, it is anticipated that the greater
inclusion of women in political parties and government would bring to the
political agenda their specific interests which it is claimed cannot always be
represented by men. Consequently, it is expected that the larger the share of
parliamentary seats that women occupy, the greater the representation of
specific women’s concerns which will translate into policy action.
Ms. Barrow-Giles stated that an evaluation of the
bills that women parliamentarians pilot through national legislators is one of
the major tools that can be used to make a determination of the impact that
woman legislators make in advancing the cause of women nationally. However,
this in itself is a difficult task as it is not easy to make a direct
connection between legislation and the outcome of such legislation to women’s
participation in the legislative process.
Research shows that in legislatures where women
constituted at least 20%, there was a greater tendency for women to
introduce/sponsor legislation concerning women, families, and children than
their male counterparts (Sue Thomas, How Women Legislate. New York:
Oxford University Press). This was further corroborated by other work which
found that women legislators were pivotal to the introduction of specific
legislation designed to address women’s rights, but they were also instrumental
in advancing bills that diversified the scope of solutions to women’s rights
problems. However she mentioned that the political assumption that women in
politics always represent specific women’s interests is not always the case as
some women enter the legislative process with ideas that are shaped and often
limited by the party under which they sought election (requirement of party
line).
As per the presenter, the Caribbean
parliamentarians have not been able to advance in terms of concrete proposals
and legislation in areas such as human trafficking (both drug and
prostitution), domestic violence legislation, sexual harassment legislation.
Thus, at this time, it’s nearly impossible to conclude that women
parliamentarians sponsor more bills dealing with the substantive areas in which
it is assumed that women ought to be invested.
Ms. Barrow-Giles highlighted that in Latin
America, there is a growing tendency to be proactive and to increasingly place
women’s issues at the forefront of the policy agenda which is set by some
powerful women and women’s movements. For example, Chili’s election campaign in
2005 included a focus on reform of the pension system in Chile, promoting the
rights of women and indigenous people and reducing inequality in the country.
She informed the assembly that according to the
United Nations report on Drugs and Crime in Latin America and the Caribbean
Region of the World Bank, gender-based violence in the region is pervasive,
therefore domestic violence legislation is an absolute necessity. In that
regard, nearly 30 countries have enacted legislation against domestic
violence. In 1991, Trinidad and Tobago became the first English speaking
Caribbean country to pass a Domestic Violence Act. Among other things, the Act
grants victims the right to petition courts for orders of protection against
their abusers. An amended Act of 1999 broadened the categories of persons to
whom the domestic violence law applied. In Jamaica, the enactment of such
legislation has also led to the establishment of The Centre for
Investigation of Sexual Offences and Child Abuse. This is a special
investigative unit within the police force, whose major role is to help foster
an enabling environment that seeks to encourage victims of domestic violence to
report sexual victimization, undertake efficient and effective investigation of
allegations of sexual abuse, provide rehabilitation of victims and increase
public education on the issue of sexual victimization.
Ms. Barrow-Giles further informed the participants
that Ecuador has been one of the main countries leading the charge to end
domestic violence and has not only succeeded in passing effective legislation
but has also established a number of public awareness programmes and female-run
police stations. Police stations known as Comisarías de la Mujer y la
Familia (Police Stations for Women and Families) were established in 1981.
She also mentioned that the Caribbean Community
(CARICOM) developed model legislation for the member states which aimed at
addressing the growing problem. The model legislation addresses sexual
harassment as a labour relations problem and provides civil remedies for those
harassed at work. The legislation extends to educational institutions, as well
as to sexual harassment in relation to accommodation. It remained, however, for
the individual Caribbean countries to carry forward legislative action. It was
noted the partnership with male counterparts in the legislation is necessary to
advance women’s issues. In the last decade, several countries in Latin America
have sought to both strengthen existing legislation and enact specific
legislation on sexual harassment, most notably Chile in 2005.
Ms Barrow-Giles continued her presentation by
talking on the legislation on Human Trafficking. She mentioned that several
Latin American and English speaking Caribbean countries serve as sources,
transit, and destination countries for people (including children) trafficked
primarily for the purposes of sexual exploitation and forced labour. Only two
jurisdictions have enacted laws which address the issue. Human trafficking is
prohibited under Belize domestic law by the Trafficking in Persons Prohibition
Act of 2003 and was followed in 2007 by Jamaica when the government passed its
Trafficking in Persons (Prevention, Suppression and Punishment Act). As vexing
as the trafficking of women, girls and boys is, both for the purpose of sexual
and labour exploitation, equally important is the use of girls and women as
drug mules by narcotraffickers. This, unfortunately, is an area which has not
been dealt with in any serious way and the criminal justice system appears to
deal with such persons in a much more severe fashion than they do males.
She concluded by stating that while many have
signed on to a number of international agreements, action at the national level
lags behind those international agreements. Women parliamentarians have no
doubt made a significant contribution towards the development of a more just
society, however they must continue to devise strategies to not only
consolidate those gains but also expand into areas that are still unchartered.
The regional rapporteurs included Djaouida Sellah
(Canada), Maria Jeannette Ruiz Delgado (Costa Rica) and Volda Lawrence
(Guyana). They were then invited to give their regional perspectives on this
session.
Ms. Djaouida Sellah (Canada) shared with
participants that women are represented at the highest levels of provincial
politics in Canada but gender equality, although a principle of the Canadian
Constitution since 1982, has still not been fully achieved. Contrary to other
countries, Canada does not have any quotas for the participation of women in
political parties. Ms. Sellah stated that the presence of women has had an important
effect on public policy. She noted that each draft law in her party is analyzed
through a gender lens. The prominence of women allows issues to be put forward
that would be otherwise forgotten, for example, in the study of economic
policies or in the budget. She acknowledged that these visions are undoubtedly
accentuated by the proportion of women in the different caucuses and that the
increasing number of women in Parliament has allowed advancing causes that help
women. She also indicated that in order to be representative of the different
perspectives of the population, parliaments must be diverse in terms of age,
profession, ethnic origin, language, and of course, gender.
Ms. Maria Ruiz Delgado (Costa Rica) began by
stating that the role of women in politics is not only a question of presence
but of impact. Costa Rica has been at the forefront of the struggle for women
to occupy decision making positions; however, there is still much to be done in
the way of legislation. Costa Rica has a female president and recently, a woman
was elected to be the President of the Judicial System, which further reflects
the country’s confidence in women leaders. Ms. Ruiz Delgado commented that
38.5% of the members of the Legislative Assembly are women, due to a reform of
the Electoral Code in 1996, which established that political parties must
assure that women represent 40% of party structures as well as district,
cantonal and provincial assemblies. In 2009, another modification to the
Electoral Code was approved in favour of gender parity in representation. This
modification will be in effect in the upcoming electoral period. Ms. Ruiz
Delgado explained that Costa Rica’s Legislative Assembly has a gender unit
which is the organ that coordinates the Women’s Commission. Gender is also a
cross-cutting theme in the country’s Institutional Strategic Plan, whereby 80%
of the annual operating plan of each department must have a minimum of one
action related to gender. Political parties also have resources from the State for
training, in which it is obligatory to discuss women’s issues.
Ms. Volda Lawrence (Guyana) expressed her belief
that the increase in women’s participation in Guyanese legislation is critical
and that it has increased political stability in her society as well as the
stability and continuity of political parties. She stated that there is
absolutely no doubt that greater representation of women in politics is
synonymous with the passing of legislation which reflects and supports women’s
issues. The growing number of women legislators in Guyana has produced visible
progress not only in the kind of laws being enacted but also in the will to
include a gender approach in existing laws. In Guyana, women legislators have
piloted many bills and motions which address issues such as child care,
salaries for nurses and teachers, subsidies for secondary education, public
health immunization, children born out of wedlock, equal rights, domestic
violence, medical termination of pregnancy, age of consent, and disabilities.
Ms. Lawrence asserted that women legislators have played a significant role not
only in passing laws but in highlighting issues that are important to women.
The assembly were then invited to ask questions,
comment on the information presented and to share experiences and practices
from their countries.
Keynote Address: Women in Power: Recent Changes
in the Political Arena –
A Vision from the Latin American Experience
The last speaker to address the assembly was Ms.
Maureen Clarke Clarke, who is the President of the Inter-American Commission of
Women (CIM), the Minister of the Status of Women of Costa Rica, and Executive
Director of the National Women’s Institute of Costa Rica. In her keynote
address, Ms. Clarke Clarke stated that from a gender perspective, it is clear
that women in patriarchal societies are kept from fully enjoying their rights
due to the sociocultural system which discriminates against them. Similarly,
she noted, the diverse groups of organized women have raised their voices to
show that they are the victims of multiple forms of discrimination. Women of
African descent, in some countries, suffer from a triple discrimination where
they are not able to access economic resources, which place them in a situation
of vulnerability and disadvantage compared to other women.
Ms. Clarke Clarke explained that in order to
discuss the recognition of rights, we must start at the construction of new
social, political, cultural, and economic articulations that recognize all
citizens as equals starting from their diversity. She insisted that the
State’s inclusion of new subjects must take place through affirmative actions
such as quotas, which have proven to be positive for the political
participation of neutral majorities. Ms. Clarke Clarke explained, however, that
the quota system has not facilitated parity of racial participation, which in
her opinion is the result of the neutrality of these policies. The political
participation of women in general is urgent, she commented, but so also is the
participation of women of African descent. It is therefore necessary for the
agenda of Afro-descendant women to be taken into consideration in decision
making processes and for their voices to be heard.
Ms. Clarke Clarke shared some of the research
compiled by the Inter-Parliamentary Union on the opinions and experiences of
men and women parliamentarians at the international level:
·While the number of women in parliaments has
increased in the last decade, in 2008, women occupied less than 18% of all
parliamentary seats.
·Women parliamentarians are not a homogeneous
group but they can share interests. There is a tendency to emphasize social
problems, the elimination of gender-based violence, poverty reduction,
development including human development, and the provision of services.
However, many women parliamentarians are interested in areas that were
previously considered to be in men’s domain, such as fiscal and exterior
policies.
·Cultural prejudices and perceptions of the role
of women, as well as the lack of financial resources, continue to present
themselves as obstacles to the political participation of women.
·It is necessary to advance on themes that have
direct implications for the effective political participation of women at all
decision making levels, such as the issue of caring as a social responsibility.
·Harassment and political violence discourage the
political participation of women, yet there are no mechanisms that prohibit
these situations.
·It is necessary to engage male parliamentarians
and political parties to commit to equality in their principles as well as in
practice.
·The link between women parliamentarians and
women’s groups and citizens must be encouraged.
·It is important to continue encouraging women
parliamentarian networks and policies that transcend individual party interests
and visions and promote instead the construction of a multi-party agenda.
Ms. Clarke Clarke stated that democracy is
indebted to women, especially women of African descent. Sustainable human
development cannot exist if women’s contributions, interests and demands
continue to be rendered invisible. In her final statement,
Ms. Clarke Clarke issued the following demands:
“We demand greater participation at all levels.
We demand that the prejudices and stereotypes that render us invisible and
situate us in a private sphere and men in the political and public spheres be
eliminated. We demand policies with a gender focus and we demand that we
advance from a position that allows us to make the specificities of our
societies visible so that they include us democratically in all the forms we
exerciseour rights.”
Closing Session and
Final Remarks
Ms. Jennifer Simmons Acting Chair of the Group of
Women Parliamentarians of the Americas presented closing remarks and thanked
the meeting organizers, guest speakers and the meeting participants. She
encouraged parliaments to continue supporting forums for discussion and
exchange.
Dr. Simons asked participants to keep in mind two
fundamental issues that are important for communities at large, but more
specifically for women. In her words, these are as follows:
1.We will have to create a more sustainable political, economic system
with more room to achieve well-being for all. We can start by using new ways to
evaluate our economies. Tools like the genuine progress indicator could be
useful as a first step in that direction.
2.It is necessary to strengthen democracy through the participation of
citizens in public decision making and by improving the transparency of
political parties specifically with respect to the processes by which they put
forward candidates for election to parliament or to the executive presidency.
Speaker Simons commented that it has become clear
that it is necessary to have enough women in parliament in order to have a
chance for change; it is also important, she noted, for other conditions to be
in place, such as cooperation between men and women. “To be able to fly we need
both wings,” she said. Dr. Simons explained that both female and male
perspectives are necessary in order to have a complete picture of humanity, but
cooperation is also very important on a practical level, just to get the votes
necessary for change.
Dr. Simons closed the session by reminding all
that discussion is important, but those ideas needs to be translated into
action plans and that the actions be implemented.
The participants were invited to approve a list of
recommendations that were noted throughout the two-day Annual Gathering. A
report of eleven recommendations (by sessions) was adopted and is presented in
the appendix 1. The participants were invited to present the report in their
respective parliaments. They were also encouraged to use this list as an action
plan and follow-up strategy in their parliaments to measure the progress on the
inclusion of gender-based initiatives.
CONCLUSION
This visit provided an excellent opportunity for
the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas to actively participate in discussions on
gender violence and gender-based public policy, topics of continued interest
and focus for the ParlAmericas Group of Women Parliamentarians. The Canadian
Section also felt that the activity allowed the participants to make contacts
with counterparts in the parliaments of many countries. The delegation would
like to thank the International Secretariat of ParlAmericas and the National
Assembly of Suriname for their tremendous work in ensuring the success of the
event.
Lastly, the delegation applauds the leadership of
Dr. Jennifer Simons for organizing an unprecedented level of high participation
in a ParlAmericas meeting of the Group of Women Parliamentarians.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan Truppe, M.P.
Head of Delegation,
Canadian Section of ParlAmericas