From July 28-August 1, 2012, Mr. John Carmichael,
M.P., Vice-Chair of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG),
led a delegation from the Canadian Section of the IPG to the 66th
annual meeting of the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC) of the Council of
State Governments in Charleston, West Virginia. The other members of the
delegation were Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette, P.C. and Senator Bob Runciman.
The delegation was accompanied by Ms. June Dewetering,
the Canadian Section’s Senior Advisor.
THE EVENT
Founded in 1947, the SLC includes state legislators
from 15 southern U.S. states (see the Appendix). Its mission is to foster and
encourage intergovernmental cooperation among member states.
At the 66th annual meeting, each of the
SLC’s six committees – Agriculture & Rural Development, Economic
Development, Transportation & Cultural Affairs, Education, Energy &
Environment, Fiscal Affairs & Government Operations, and Human Services
& Public Safety – met, as did the Gulf Coast & Atlantic States Task
Force. As well, plenary sessions were held and a food packaging community
service project was completed.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
At the 66th annual meeting, the following
plenary and other sessions were held, and some topics were discussed by more
than one committee concurrently:
·Plenary Sessions and Activities:
ØHomer Hickam
ØJennifer Garner and Mark Kennedy Shriver
ØSLC/Mark Norris Campaign Against
Hunger: Food Packaging Community Service Project
ØLegislative Fiscal Plenary
·Agriculture & Rural Development Committee:
ØInvasive Species
ØFarm Bill Update
ØAg Trade and State Trade Promotion
ØImpact of Herbicide Resistant Weeds
·Economic Development, Transportation &
Cultural Affairs Committee:
ØEvolving Role of State Infrastructure Banks: Lessons from the
States
ØFederal Surface Transportation Authorization Legislation: West
Virginia’s Perspectives
ØCompeting in the National and Global Marketplace in Fiscally
Challenging Times: West Virginia’s Approach
ØInfrastructure’s Impact on Economic Growth
·Education Committee:
ØCollege Readiness and Completion: Update on Kentucky Senate Bill
1
ØHigher Education Finance Reform: Lessons from Tennessee
·Energy & Environment Committee:
ØEnergy Security and Economic Development: The Future of
Infrastructure
ØAdvancements in Renewable Fuels Technology
ØFossil Fuels and the Role of Emerging Technologies
ØSouth States Energy Board 2012 Legislative Digest
·Fiscal Affairs & Government Operations
Committee:
ØEnhancing the Funding Position of State Medicaid Programs:
Lessons from Virginia
ØTo Expand or Not To Expand: State Medicaid Programs and the
Affordable Care Act
ØLeveling the Playing Field: Online Versus Main Street Purchases
ØBolstering the Financial Position of State Unemployment Insurance
Funds: Recent Trends from Virginia
ØComparative Data Report Presentations
·Gulf Coast & Atlantic States Regional Task
Force:
ØModern Advancements in Homeland Security and Emergency Management
·Human Services & Public Safety Committee:
ØEnhancing the Funding Position of State Medicaid Programs:
Lessons from Virginia
ØTo Expand or Not To Expand: State Medicaid Programs and the
Affordable Care Act
ØJustice Reinvestment: Strategies for Curbing Recidivism and Reducing
Corrections Costs.
DELEGATION
OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
Canada and the 15 SLC states have a mutually
beneficial relationship, and the majority of these states have Canada as their
primary export market. Recent figures indicate that more than 2.8 million jobs
in those states rely on Canada-U.S. trade, which was valued at just over
US$103.1 billion in one year: more than US$54 billion was exported from the 15
states to Canada, while they imported just over $49 billion from us. Visits are
also frequent. In a recent 12-month period, Canadians made more than 6.5
million visits to the SLC states and spent more than US$4.8 billion, while
residents of those states made more than 1.7 million visits to Canada and spent
nearly $1.3 billion.
At this event, the delegates conveyed to state
legislators the nature, magnitude and importance of the relationship between
Canada and the U.S. South. They also identified areas of new and existing
cooperation and collaboration.
This report summarizes the presentations made during
the plenary and selected other sessions.
SUMMARY OF PRESENTATIONS
INVASIVE SPECIES
G. Keith Douce, University of Georgia
·It is important to identify and address invasive
species quickly.
·An invasive species is a seed, egg, spore or
other biological agent that is not native to that ecosystem and that is likely
to cause harm.
·Geographical, political and other boundaries or
borders are irrelevant to invasive species.
·Invasive species can be introduced in a variety
of ways, including through pets and trade; regarding the latter, the economic
benefits should be assessed in light of the costs.
·The speed of introduction of invasive species
and their spread is accelerating, although the problem is not new.
·Federal regulators have responsibilities in
terms of invasive species, but too little inspection occurs at the borders.
·Only 1% of the invasive species that is
introduced becomes established, and an invasive species can be introduced but
may not become a problem for a decade, if not centuries.
·There are more than 2,700 invasive species that
of concern to the United States.
·Steps for dealing with invasive species include
assessments and risk analysis, prevention, early detection, rapid response and
eradication, control and management, restoration, research, and public
education and awareness.
·Asia, especially southeast Asia, is often the
source of invasive species.
·Invasive species have health, environmental,
water, economic and other impacts.
·States should collaborate, coordinate and
cooperate, as invasive species do not respect state boundaries.
·States should have an invasive species response
plan, an invasive species fund dedicated to “addressing” invasive species, and
an invasive species prevention plan.
FARM BILL UPDATE
Bob Tabb, State of West Virginia
·The outlook for the next U.S. Farm Bill is
“fluid”; the Senate bill focuses on revenue, while the House of Representatives
bill focuses on historical margins.
·Politics often “gets into” the food chain.
·The biggest issue in relation to the Farm Bill
is geography.
·With the current drought in parts of the United
States, the U.S. Congress is realizing the importance of safety net programs
for agriculture.
·Agriculture is important to the United States
and the world; without food, democracy is not possible.
·Legislation other than the Farm Bill also
affects agriculture, including – for example – laws addressing transportation.
·Farmers are practising environmentalists.
ENHANCING THE
FUNDING POSITION OF STATE MEDICAID PROGRAMS: LESSONS FROM VIRGINIA
Bill Hazel, State of Virginia
·Medicaid is a significant federal cost.
·The population that is eligible for Medicaid has
grown as a consequence of such factors as the recent recession and expanded
services.
·The sequestration associated with the Budget
Control Act of 2011 will be a significant problem for at least some states.
·Medicaid fraud is an issue for at least some
states.
·Managed care is highly effective in terms of
“managing” costs.
TO EXPAND OR NOT TO EXPAND: STATE MEDICAID PROGRAMS
AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
Chris Whatley, Council of State Governments
·The 2010 Affordable Care Act, which was
never conferenced in Congress, was narrowly passed, and some states and
businesses challenged the law; the Supreme Court decision was released on 28
June 2012.
·The Department of Health and Human Services is
likely to be as flexible as possible in letting states make their own
decisions.
·Many Americans do not like the Affordable
Care Act; if the states agree to establish exchanges, then they will be
“owning” the legislation as well as the animus that is already being borne by
Congress.
ENERGY
SECURITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THE FUTURE OF INFRASTRUCTURE
Tristan Sanregret, Government of Alberta
·Alberta has large oil and gas reserves that
require infrastructure, including pipelines, to be moved to the United States;
improved pipeline capacity is needed.
·Alberta has been producing oil from the oil
sands since the 1960s, and has been exporting it for 20 years.
·Canada is the United States’ primary source of
oil, and is a safe and secure energy source.
·There is an “incredible” energy synergy between
Canada and the United States; the Canadian federal government receives taxes,
the Alberta provincial government receives royalties, and the United States
benefits in terms of its consultants and suppliers of parts, among others.
·There are 1,000 U.S. companies in the Canadian
oil supply chain.
·There is great potential for Canadian oil and
gas to move to the Gulf Coast to meet energy demand, thereby displacing
Venezuelan and Mexican supplies.
·The Keystone XL pipeline would lead to
significant job creation in the United States.
·Alberta needs to be pursuing oil markets
wherever they may be.
·If Western Canadian oil were to move to Canada’s
east coast, there would be opportunities for that oil to serve New England
states.
·The market “works,” and oil will “find a home.”
·Oil can be moved by rail, truck, barge and/or
pipeline.
Jim
Dunlap, Jim Dunlap Consultants
·“Pipeline jobs” are “union jobs,” and they lead
to the creation of jobs in restaurants, hotels and other businesses.
·The oil refining market is in the Gulf Coast,
and the Gulf Coast presents opportunities for Canada.
·Regarding the Keystone XL pipeline, the special
session of the Nebraska Legislature gave “coverage” to the federal Administration;
it has been agreed that the pipeline will be routed through Nebraska according
to a revised path.
ADVANCEMENTS
IN RENEWABLE FUELS TECHNOLOGY
Randy Wolfe, Balcones Resources
·The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
hierarchy for reducing landfill is: source reduction and reuse, recycling and
composting, and energy recovery.
·“Waste” is what is left after recycling has
occurred; the value of this residual is based on the cost that would be
incurred in transforming it into something useful.
·The nature of “waste” has changed over time;
consider that coffee used to be sold in a steel can, then in plastic cans and
now in vacuum-packed plastic bricks with a multi-layer construction that is
harder to recycle.
·Energy recovery is an important element in the
United States’ recovery and security.
HIGHER
EDUCATION FINANCE REFORM: LESSONS FROM TENNESSEE
David Wright, Tennessee Higher Education Commission
·Education leads to higher earnings and a better
quality of life, and states with a more highly educated population tend to do
better.
·Tennessee now has a new funding formula for
higher education; the previous formula was based on enrolment, so the only
incentive was to try to get bigger, with the result that geography and
demography drove institutional growth.
·With Tennessee’s lottery scholarship initiative,
funds largely went to students who would have pursued higher education anyway
and these funds covered a decreasing percentage of tuition and fees.
·With Tennessee’s fiscal realities, fewer state
funds were available for institutional operations, enrolment was growing and
costs were rising; a new vision was needed for higher education in Tennessee.
·Tennessee now has an outcomes-based funding
formula for education that is primarily focused on increasing educational attainment,
institutions are becoming specialized so that duplication of programs and
services is reduced, remedial and developmental education can no longer be done
at a public institution, the community college system operates as a system, and
regional research partnerships exist.
·It is not necessarily the case that excellent
institutions will mean that the higher education system is able to meet the
needs of the state.
·With Tennessee’s outcomes-based funding formula,
there is a unique weighting structure for each outcome for each campus; the
weighted outcomes reflect the mission differentiation among institutions.
·In 2010, Tennessee passed the Complete
College Tennessee Act; it provided reforms in such areas as student
transfer, research collaboration and the funding formula.
·Tennessee’s outcomes-based funding formula has
existed for two years, and the approach is linked directly to educational
attainment goals.
·Tennessee ended its enrolment-based funding
formula, and replaced it with a formula that is entirely a function of
outcomes; an institution-specific weighting structure that reflects
institutional mission also exists.
·Outcomes for universities can include the number
of student credit hours, degrees granted and research funds awarded.
·Outcomes for community colleges can include the
number of student hours accumulated, certificates and job placements.
·Each year, all state funding is “up for grabs”
and must be earned anew in the sense that institutions have no entitlement to
any minimal level of appropriations based on funding in one or more previous
years; in essence, all appropriations are reallocated each year to reflect
changes in “productivity.”
·By its very nature, tuition is an
enrolment-based funding model.
PLENARY
SESSION
Homer Hickam, Author
·In order to write a memoir, an author needs to
have interesting parents, to be from an interesting place and, ideally, to be
living at that place at an interesting time.
·Companies need to recapture historic connections
with their employees and the communities in which they operate.
·People should stand up for what they believe, be
proud of who they are, and trust in God but rely on themselves.
AG TRADE
AND STATE TRADE PROMOTION
Charles Green, State of Virginia
·Virginia’s two largest sectors are agriculture
and forestry, providing nearly 500,000 jobs through production, value-added and
“ripple” sectors; these two sectors have an economic impact of almost $80
million annually: $55 billion from agriculture and $24 billion from forestry.
·Exports lead to jobs and opportunities, and
export-related jobs pay, on average, 15% more than other jobs.
·Every $1 in the value of exports creates another
$1.40 in such support activities as processing, packaging, financing and shipping.
·It is important to “buy local but sell global,”
build strong partnerships with the private sector, and capitalize on diverse
market and product portfolios.
·Soybeans, grains and meat products are
supporting growth in the value of Virginia’s agricultural exports, as are the
Asian and North African regions.
·Virginia’s top agricultural exports are soybeans
and soybean meal and oil, grains, pork, poultry, leaf tobacco, wood products,
fats and oils, cotton, seafood and aquaculture products, fresh fruits and
vegetables, hides and skins, processed food products, beverages and rendered
products.
·Virginia has a wide range of markets for its
exports, in part because of the diverse range of its export products.
·Keys to Virginia’s global success include the
product diversity offered by growers and producers, the strategic mid-Atlantic
location, world-class transportation systems, a business-friendly climate,
public-sector recognition of the importance of exports, and full integration of
the agriculture and forestry sectors into the state’s economic development and
job creation strategic plan.
·Strategies to increase Virginia’s agricultural
exports including strong partnerships with the private sector, a focus on
retaining a solid market presence in mature and established markets, the
pursuit of growth opportunities in emerging markets, the development of
business in “unconventional” markets, preservation of farmland and a focus on
keeping farming profitable.
·Virginia is allocating new state funds for trade
representatives in key markets, undertaking gubernatorial and Secretary of
Agriculture missions to designated countries, advocating open and fair trade
policies, and fighting artificial international trade barriers.
IMPACT OF
HERBICIDE RESISTANT WEEDS
Bob Nichols, Cotton Incorporated
·The term “weed resistance” can be defined as
“the inherited ability of a weed population to survive and reproduce after
exposure to an herbicide dose (rate) that would control an unselected
population.”
·Herbicide resistance is an economic problem now,
and the problem could get worse before it gets better; certainly, the problem
will get worse if nothing is done to address it.
·An herbicide mechanism of action (MOA) is the
means by which the herbicide controls the weed; there are 16 MOAs, and weeds
will generally be resistant to all herbicides with the same MOA.
·Weed control should involve a host of
complementary products.
·No herbicides with new MOAs are in advanced
development trials, and the last new MOA was introduced more than 20 years ago;
as a result, currently available herbicides will have to be relied upon for the
foreseeable future.
·The number of weed species with resistance to
more than one herbicide MOA has increased dramatically since 1990; at present,
there are 50 weed species with multiple forms of resistance.
·It is possible to manage herbicides to retard
resistance by using the full application rates specified on the label,
diversifying MOAs within seasons, and rotating traits and herbicides between
seasons.
·For the future, it is important to continue and
to increase education and training that delivers a consistent message,
research, and the development of new weed control options.
COMPETING
IN THE NATIONAL AND GLOBAL MARKETPLACE IN FISCALLY CHALLENGING TIMES: WEST VIRGINIA’S
APPROACH
Keith Burdette, State of West Virginia
·It is not possible to respond to economic
challenges when they start; there is a need to plan in advance for when the
challenges will happen.
·Perception can be clear but narrow; it is
important not to look at things too narrowly.
·It is important to get the “fiscal house in
order” in order to support economic development and growth; for example, it is
important to balance the budget in order to reduce taxes strategically as a
means to entice business.
·West Virginia has not increased its general
taxes in 17 years, and some of the state’s taxes are being reduced.
·Exports create jobs.
·West Virginia’s major export products are coal
and plastics.
·There is a need to deal with drugs in the
workplace and with the taking of drugs by those in the workforce.
·In July 2012, West Virginia introduced drug
testing as a pre-condition for publicly funded training.
·It is important to have a skilled and adequate
workforce.
INFRASTRUCTURE’S
IMPACT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
Alex Herrgott, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
·The federal gas tax has not been increased since
1993, and purchasing power has been lost.
·Many roads were built 50 years ago; they are at
the end of their useful life, yet funds to address the problem – whether replacement
or maintenance – are not available.
·The U.S. interstate highway system belongs to
the nation, rather than to particular states.
·It is important to act now, as transportation
projects often take a long time to come to fruition; infrastructure problems
can be solved, or the consequences of failing to do so must be accepted.
·Expansion of the Panama Canal will lead to
shifts in trade patterns.
·Intermodal networks are important for moving
goods domestically and for export.
·Funding solutions and financing solutions are
needed, as is confidence in future federal funding.
·Needs and priorities must be the focus of
sustained actions.
·Infrastructure problems are many, but solutions
are few.
PLENARY
SESSION
Jennifer Garner, Actress and Producer
·There is a need to “set children’s brains up”
for learning.
·About 90% of brain growth occurs prior to age 5.
·Failure to read to, and chat with, babies
results in them falling behind.
·Mothers and their babies need to make
connections through playing together.
·Reading is critically important.
Mark Kennedy
Shriver, Save the Children
·Early childhood education is critically
important; 40% of U.S. children are not involved in this type of education.
·About 25% of American children lives in poverty.
·Save the Children started in Kentucky in 1932
with a focus on education and rural areas.
·The best way in which to expand the size of the
“economic pie” is to invest in children.
·Focused efforts during the first 5 years of life
yield the greatest rate of return, as most brain growth occurs prior to age 5.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group