The Third Executive Committee Meeting
of the Inter-Parliamentarians for Social Service (IPSS) was held from August 23
to August 25, 2006, in Jeju, Republic of Korea, under the Chairmanship of Hon.
Lee Kyeong-Jae, President of the IPSS. As the Vice-President of the IPSS and
member of the Executive Committee, Mr. Bryon Wilfert, M.P., P.C. was the
Canadian delegate who was invited to participate at this meeting.
The three-day meeting was attended by
representatives from the Republic of Korea, Canada, Saudi Arabia and Sudan and by a representative from the Mongolian Embassy, who took on the role as an
observer. The Executive Committee deliberated on the agenda for the Third IPSS
General Assembly and a Draft Business Plan. The Executive Committee is expected
to meet again in January 2007 prior to the Third General Assembly, in August
2007. Both venues are yet to be determined.
The Program
The central aim of the conference was
to exchange ideas among members of the Executive Committee and to provide a
collaborative draft of a business plan. A discussion was held on a proposed
agenda for the Third IPSS General Assembly, which included suggestions for
topics for the Address by Heads of Delegation and topics for General Debate.
In addition to the orders of business,
the delegates attended a dinner hosted by the IPSS President, a luncheon hosted
by the Governor of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province as well as a dinner
hosted by the IPSS Honorary President.
The Governor of Jeju Special
Self-Governing Province outlined the Aggressive Tourism Strategy for Jeju Island as well as talking about the benefits of a tax-free international zone.
IPSS Draft Business Plan
A thorough discussion was held on an
IPSS Draft Business Plan. The plan entails three interrelated parts: it
establishes the roles of the IPSS, it outlines the necessary actions to fulfill
those roles effectively, and it includes both concerns and objectives for the
future of IPSS.
1. Roles of IPSS:
a)The IPSS should play a more proactive role as an association of
parliaments with effective policy tools such as the authority to allocate
budget and legislate.
b)Simultaneously, however, the IPSS is not an executive authority and
should not be overambitious about its role or the contributions it can make in
providing the needed social services;
c)Therefore, in order for the IPSS to achieve both a realistic and
effective program to provide the needed social services, the IPSS must
carefully consider and balance the needs of the recipient countries with the
donor countries.
2. Action Plan:
a)Sharing information and identifying the best practices is required
to uphold the above objectives.
·As suggested by the Committee, setting up a
clearing house which acts as a medium in which relevant information can be
shared is a practical way to exchange ideas.
·Furthermore, it was suggested that beyond the
shared practices of recipients and donor countries, the IPSS should seek
advices of experts.
b)Identifying areas of social services that the IPSS should
concentrate on such as landmine sweeping, health and medical services,
environmental protection etc…and to select target areas for a specific time
period.
·The potential areas that were decided to be
selected at the 3rd IPSS General Assembly are, providing sanitary
drinking water and eradicating pandemics such as malaria and AIDS.
b)Monitoring, coordinating and expediting activities of different key
players that ranges from local to national to international governments and
organizations.
c)Connecting and linking activities of other inter-parliamentary
organizations, such as IPU, AIPO, AAPP etc…
·Seek ways to introduce the activities of the
IPSS to the upcoming IPU General Assemblies.
·Draft and submit a report on the activities of
the IPSS to the IPU.
3. Future Action Plans
a.The Executive Committee decided to seek additional input from those
members who were unable to attend. Since IPSS has only been in existence for
three years, the establishment of an effective business plan with appropriate
support was considered imperative in moving the organization forward.
*This draft
business plan reflects the discussion that took place at the 3rd
Executive Meeting however, it must be noted that the final version will include
the feedback and responses of members who were absent.
b.The 3rd Executive Committee reaffirmed the decision of
the 2nd General Assembly that the 3rd General
Assembly should be held in August 2007. It was decided that the venue should be
determined no later than October, to give the host country time to prepare.
c)It was also agreed in principle that another Executive Committee
Meeting should be held before the 3rd General Assembly, in
January 2007. The venue is yet to be determined.
In closing, it was decided that the
record of the discussion would be distributed to all members of the Executive
Committee for their feedback and suggestions and a final version of the
business plan will then be circulated to the entire IPSS membership.
Conclusion
The 3rd Executive Committee
Meeting of the IPSS proved to be a useful and constructive opportunity where
delegates were able to contribute towards a business plan outlining both the
objectives and tools required to deliver social services to countries in an
effective and realistic manner. It is a privilege for the Canadian Parliament
to have representation on the Executive Committee. As a member, it provides an
opportunity for Canadian values to be incorporated in this global dialogue.
Respectfully
submitted,
Hon. Marie-P. Poulin, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-Japan Inter-Parliamentary Group
Hon.
Bryon Wilfert, P.C., M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-Japan Inter-Parliamentary Group