From October 19-23, 2011, the Honourable Wayne Easter, P.C.,
M.P. led a delegation from the Canadian Section of the Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) to the national conference of the Council of State
Governments (CSG) in Bellevue, Washington. The other delegate was Phil
McColeman, M.P. They were accompanied by Ms. June Dewetering, Senior Advisor to
the Canadian Section.
THE EVENT
The CSG serves all three branches of state government
and provides regional fora – the western, midwestern, southern and eastern
regional conferences – through which ideas and insights are exchanged with a
view to shaping public policy. Each year, the CSG convenes a national
conference, which is attended by selected governors and state legislators from
throughout the United States. In addition to this annual conference, the CSG’s
various regions hold an annual meeting.
At the CSG’s 2011 national conference, a North
American Summit was concurrently held. Historically, this Summit has often been
an element of the Council of State Governments-WEST annual meeting.
DELEGATION OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT
The interaction with governors and state legislators enables members
of the Canadian Section of the IPG to achieve the aim of finding points of
convergence in respective policies, initiating dialogue on points of
divergence, encouraging exchanges of information and promoting better
understanding among legislators on shared issues of concern. Moreover, the
meetings provide members with an opportunity to give input to, and gather
information about, state-level issues that affect Canada. In light of the
nature, scope and importance of the Canada-US relationship, it is anticipated
that the Canadian Section of the IPG will continue its participation at the
CSG’s annual national and regional meetings.
In particular, delegates found the 2011 national conference of the
CSG to be an important occasion on which to speak with state legislators from
throughout the United States as well as with Governor Schweitzer (Montana),
Canada’s Ambassador to the United States, Gary Doer, and the United States’
Ambassador to Canada, David Jacobson. Delegates informed conference
participants that Canada is the primary foreign export market for 35 US states
and that 8 million US jobs depend on bilateral trade with Canada. These
meetings are invaluable in gaining insights about American views of Canada and
about Canada’s activities, through Canadian diplomats, in the United States.
ACTIVITIES DURING THE EVENT
During the CSG’s 2011 National Conference
and North American Summit, the CSG held two keynote sessions:
·The Moment of Truth: Confronting Issues in
America; and
·Biography of the New American Continent.
As well, a number of plenary,
policy, task force and breakout sessions were held:
·Global Competitiveness: How Do We
Create a College-Going Culture?
·Thinking Globally, Acting Locally
·Looking for Medicaid Relief in
All the Right Places
·Governing in North America:
Strengthening Global Relations Through Intergovernmental Engagement
·If You Build It, Will They Come?
A North American Perspective on Electrical Transmission Line Siting
·Lessons Learned from Japan’s
Earthquake and Tsunami
·Neighbors, Friends & Allies:
North American Cooperation and the Roles of States
·Maximizing Oil Partnerships in
North America
·Managing Western Water in
Evolving Climate Conditions
·Jobs & Commerce: Revitalizing
the North American Economy
·North American Cooperation in
Public Safety and Law Enforcement.
This report summarizes the discussions that occurred at the
keynote and plenary as well as selected policy, task force and breakout
sessions.
THE MOMENT OF TRUTH: CONFRONTING ISSUES IN AMERICA
Alan Simpson, Former Member of the US Senate and
Co-Chair, National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform
·things are critically important at the state
level
·in politics, it is not possible to compromise
without compromising yourself
·in 6.5 years, former President George W. Bush
did not veto a spending bill, despite two wars, etc.
·former President Ronald Reagan raised taxes
11 times during his eight-year presidency
·in the United States, the federal defence budget
“has a lot of fat in it”
·“deficit denial” is as dead as the dodo bird
·the conclusions reached by the National
Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform upset everyone; thus, it can be
concluded that the Commission was a success
·it is relatively unimportant how the United
States got to where it is; what is important is how the United States is going
to move forward
·in the United States, big reductions and
changes are needed to social security, Medicare, Medicaid and defence
·social security was envisioned as a
supplement, not as a retirement plan or as disability insurance
·it is imprudent to spend more than is earned
·it is “stupid” to borrow $0.42 for every $1
that is spent
·there is no need to raise taxes; instead, the
focus should be on existing tax expenditures
·in politics, there is no right answer;
instead, there is only an ongoing series of compromises
BIOGRAPHY OF THE NEW AMERICAN CONTINENT
Anthony De Palma, Author
·the United States needs to refocus its
energies on “putting its house in order”
·in the 10 years since the 11 September 2001
terrorist attacks, the United States could have made so much progress in its
relationship with Canada and with Mexico; instead, the United States has let
old animosities creep back into the relationships
·there is no question: the United States’
borders with Canada and Mexico have thickened since the terrorist attacks of 11
September 2001
·in 2000, all three countries that are a party
to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) had national
elections, which saw the election or re-election, as the case may be, of
Vincente Fox, George W. Bush and Jean Chretien
·in response to the question “are we all in
this together even if sometimes we would rather not be,” the answer is “yes”
·in some ways, the 444 million people who live
in the three NAFTA countries are reluctant partners who may not always like
each other but increasingly cannot do without each other; while – at least to
some extent – they share a history, a geography and an economic reality, there
are three distinct deoxyribonucleic acids (DNAs)
·Canada is the United States’ primary source
of oil
·35 of the 50 US states have Canada as their
primary foreign export market, and 22 states have Mexico as either the primary
or secondary foreign export market; that said, China has surpassed Mexico as
the United States’ second most important trading partner
·8 million US jobs depend on bilateral trade
with Canada; consequently, the US unemployment rate would exceed 15% over night
if trade with Canada were to end
·while NAFTA did result in some job losses, it
is important to assess its impact across all three nations; the bottom line is
that NAFTA has created winners and losers, and not always in equal number
·it would not be surprising if, during the
2012 national election campaigns in the United States and Mexico, there was
discussion about reopening NAFTA
·NAFTA helped Mexico to advance and,
consequently, the United States and Canada as well; Mexico has become more
transparent, spending is under control, finances are sound, and the nation’s
young democracy is becoming stronger each year
·regarding the proposed Keystone XL pipeline,
some support the proposal and some do not; that said, if the United States does
not support the proposal, Canada’s oil sands will continue to exist, and Canada
will sell oil to China
·at times, it is hard to find a “North
American” identity; because of the asymmetry among the NAFTA countries, it has
been hard to build the same sense of community that exists in Europe
·examples exist of both Canada-US cooperation,
such as with the International Joint Commission and in respect of the Columbia
River, and of US-Mexico cooperation, such as with the maquiladoras
·before NAFTA, Canada and Mexico had little to
do with each other; in the years since NAFTA, Canada-Mexico relations have been
variable and Canada has made it clear that it would prefer to deal with the
United States alone
·the three NAFTA countries are converging in
terms of their views regarding democracy, freedom, independence and respect for
human rights
·the three NAFTA nations rarely meet and, when
they do, relatively little gets done
·in the past, the idea of North American
continental integration has happened when all three NAFTA leaders have shared
the same political ideology
THINKING GLOBALLY, ACTING LOCALLY
Colin Robertson, McKenna, Long and Aldridge
·many positive arguments could be made for
trilateralism among Canada, the United States and Mexico
·the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) is very much a sequel to the predecessor agreement between Canada and
the United States
·the perimeter security and economic
competitiveness agenda announced by Prime Minister Harper and President Obama
in February 2011 will be as significant as NAFTA
·like it or not, we live in a global world
·while Canada has 0.5% of the world’s
population, it is responsible for 2.5% of global trade
·increasingly, trade barriers are regulatory
in nature; in Canada, many of the regulatory barriers fall within
provincial/territorial jurisdiction
·businesses have moved ahead of where
governments are
·what really matters are relationships,
including among legislators and between legislators and the private sector
·regional interests require regional
cooperation and solutions
·follow-up is important in order to ensure
that issues progress
Francois Ouimet, Member of the National Assembly of
Quebec
·the province of Quebec has a broad network of
foreign offices
·the United States is Quebec’s most important foreign
country
·Quebec is involved in a number of bilateral,
multilateral and inter-parliamentary fora
Diputado Ramiro Flores Morales, Member of the Coahuila
State Legislature
·the globalized world provides opportunities
to raise the standard of living of citizens worldwide
·in a globalized world, what affects one
affects the others
·the border between nations should work well
for commerce
·legislators should work together in order to
help their constituents
GOVERNING IN NORTH AMERICA: STRENGTHENING GLOBAL
RELATIONS THROUGH INTERGOVERNMENTAL ENGAGEMENT
Marcus Conklin, Member of the Nevada Legislature
·it is important that legislators travel to
other jurisdictions, since doing so enables them to “start the conversation”
·speaking with other legislators enables the
sharing of best practices
Wayne Easter, Member of the Canadian House of Commons
·the United States’ focus on security since
the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 has affected North America’s
economic potential
·8 million US jobs depend on trade with
Canada, and Canada is the United States’ largest supplier of oil and gas
·moving ahead, the key question is how our
nations should build understanding and grow together in the North American
context
·on a regional basis, states and provinces
need to speak with a common voice to the federal governments in Washington and
Ottawa respectively
·Canada is very concerned about the United
States becoming increasingly protectionist
Russ Jones, Member of the Arizona House of
Representatives
·trade will always follow the path of least
resistance
·infrastructure, and not just at the border,
is needed in order to support trade
·the world is global; this reality must be
recognized, and measures should be put in place to take advantage of it
Gary Stevens, Member of the Alaska Senate
·Alaska has a long border with Canada
·the seafood sector is the largest employer in
Alaska
·relationships are primary, and everything
else is derivative
·in countries like Argentina, corruption is a
“huge” problem
·it is important to create a level playing
field and to ensure that everyone “plays by the rules”
Bob Godfrey, Member of the Connecticut General
Assembly
·all politics are definitely local
·although state legislators do not campaign on
foreign policy issues, it is important to recognize that the world is global
·the economies in Canada and the United States
are interdependent, and $1.7 billion in trade crosses the shared border each
day, with implications for jobs
·North America is comprised of three great
nations
·it is important to develop personal
relationships and to engage in discussions with each other
David Wilson, Member of the Nova Scotia Legislature
·regional cooperation is very important
·it is important that legislators worth
together regardless of their political affiliation
·on the North American east coast, the
economies are intertwined
·when the United States does not do well,
Canada does not do well; similarly, when the United States does not do well,
nor does Mexico
·it is important to build relationships,
particularly as work is required on common issues, such as security and
transportation
Richard Perkins, Member of the Nevada Legislature
·when legislators travel to other
jurisdictions, they are exposed to different cultures, issues, solutions, best
practices, etc.
·it is not possible to keep the United States
safe without a dialogue with other nations
LESSONS LEARNED FROM JAPAN’S EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI
John Madden, Alaska Division of Homeland Security and
Emergency Management
·critical emergency-response infrastructure
that will be needed should be identified before a disaster occurs
·the order in which infrastructure will come
back online should be determined in advance of a disaster
·advance planning helps with recovery
·the needs of communities should be known
·people are at risk regardless of where they
live
·the effects of a disaster can extend far
beyond the rubble
·leadership before a disaster is as important
as leadership after the disaster
Jim Mullen, Washington Division of Emergency
Management
·it is important to consider what the
“post-disaster landscape” will look like; after a disaster, what will be the
“new normal” and how will people deal with it?
·community leaders should take stock of what
they have and determine how ready the community is for the risks that it faces
·everyone should be “taught” about
preparedness and a preparedness culture should be instilled in people; everyone
has a role to play
·people should determine their own
capabilities and assess how they would survive a disaster until external help
arrives
·the key thing in a disaster is to save lives
NEIGHBORS, FRIENDS AND ALLIES: NORTH AMERICAN COOPERATION
AND THE ROLE OF STATES
Gary Doer, Canadian Ambassador to the United States
·trade among the three North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) countries should continue to the extent possible
·risks should be managed away from the border
between countries
·regarding NAFTA, it is not possible to “turn
back the clock,” and nor would Canada wish to do so; although there are gaps in
NAFTA, it has long-term value for businesses
·North America is characterized by integrated
supply chains
·technology should be used more effectively
·45 of the last 50 threats in the United
States were domestic in origin
·risks should be managed before they arrive at
the border
·it is crucial that information be shared
·President Obama promised to wean the United
States off oil from the Middle East; the proposed Keystone XL pipeline would
help with this goal and with US energy security
·the US states through which the proposed
Keystone XL pipeline would pass are tremendously supportive of the pipeline
·water should not be diverted from one
watershed to another; also, foreign invasive species should not be introduced
from one watershed to another
·a “can do” attitude can get things done
Arturo Sarukhan, Mexican Ambassador to the United
States
·data indicate that the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an unmitigated success story
·25 US states have Mexico as their primary or
secondary foreign export market
·Canada and Mexico are the primary and
secondary suppliers respectively of oil to the United States
·on any given day, there are 1 million legal
crossings of the US-Mexico border
·each day, $1 billion in trade crosses the
US-Mexico border
·competitiveness can be enhanced through trade
facilitation
·in North America, supply chains are
integrated in a north-south direction
·the three NAFTA countries should focus on
energy security and efficiency
·pre-inspection should occur at inland customs
facilities so that borders can be “unclogged”
·the building of 20-foot walls would lead to
sales of 25-foot ladders
·risk management should occur, and “smart
technology” should be used to enhance border security
·if there is another attack on the United
States, Canada and Mexico would suffer
·Mexico is responsible for stemming the flow
of drugs destined for the United States; the United States is the largest
market for illicit drugs
·transnational organized crime is a real
threat to the rule of law
·Mexico has stringent gun control laws
David Jacobson, US Ambassador to Canada
·Canada is the United States’ largest trading partner,
followed by Mexico, which is the second-largest trading partner for the United
States
·attempts are under way to eliminate
regulatory differences among the three North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) countries
·1% of US businesses export, and about 80% of
those businesses export only one product
·the average car crosses the Canada-US border
seven times before it is purchased
·NAFTA should be liberalized, for example
through including sub-national procurement
·building fences at the borders that the
United States shares with Canada and Mexico does not make sense; the countries
should be breaking down, rather than building, barriers
·to increase security and efficiency, as much
security as possible should be moved away from the border
·for the United States, Canada is the safest,
most secure source of foreign oil, followed by Mexico
·regarding the proposed Keystone XL pipeline,
it should be noted that any piece of infrastructure that crosses a US border
requires a presidential permit; the Keystone XL pipeline has become the premier
environmental issue in the United States because there is no environmental
legislation under consideration in the US Congress
·people on both sides of the Canada-US border
have enormous respect for one another; the two nations have an extraordinary
relationship
·in 2010, Canadians spent 44 million nights in
Florida
INCREASING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT BY
EDUCATING STUDENTS TO SUCCEED IN A CHANGING WORLD
David Conley,University of Oregon, Center
for Educational Policy Research and Educational Policy Improvement
Center
·the current educational system is based on
assumptions about the world that students will be entering; the world has
changed, but the educational system has not changed with it
·retraining does not work unless the person
being retrained has sound underlying educational skills
·people now change jobs and careers regularly
·at some companies, employees earn more
through increasing value for the company, rather than through more seniority
·today’s young people believe that they are
entitled to a good standard of living
·too many students are in remedial education,
and most students do not recover from being at a remedial level
·the policy environment is focused on college
and careers, rather than on the acquisition of basic skills
·there are four levels of readiness:
Øwork – meets basic expectations about workplace
behaviour and demeanour
Øjob – possesses specific knowledge needed to
begin an entry-level position
Øcareer – possesses sufficient foundational
knowledge and skills as well as general learning strategies relevant to a
career pathway
Øcollege – is prepared in the four dimensions of
college readiness needed to succeed in entry-level general education courses
·there are four keys to college- and
career-readiness that, when mastered, indicate success:
Økey cognitive strategies – problem formulation,
research, interpretation and communication, all of which demonstrate an ability
to hypothesize, strategize, identify, collect, analyze, evaluate, organize and
construct
Økey learning skills and techniques – time
management, study skills, retention of factual information, goal setting,
self-awareness, persistence, collaborative learning and “ownership” of learning
Økey transition knowledge and skills – admissions
requirements, college types and missions, career pathways, college
affordability, college culture, relations with professors and social/identity
issues in transitioning
·at present, schools do not teach students how
to be learners
·most of what is taught gets forgotten
·accountability measures should focus on
success after high school and not on awarding diplomas
THE GLOBAL VALUE OF COAL: CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES OPEN
THE DOOR
Frank Clemente, Penn State University
·energy is one of the biggest problems that
will have to be faced by the next generation; key questions are: where will the
energy come from to support the life that the next generation wants, and will
the next generation be able to afford it?
·electricity is the lifeblood of society
·when electricity comes to an area, women and
children are the largest beneficiaries; electricity can change lives
·global “electrical poverty” is real; some
people have no access to electricity, while others have access that is limited
to a certain number of hours per day or a certain number of days per week
·in terms of energy, everything is needed
every where all the time: nuclear, oil, hydroelectricity, natural gas, coal,
etc.
·the future of electricity is being formed at
the global level
·in the United States, coal will be a leading
source of incremental power generation through 2035
·the United States has 30% of the world’s
coal, and that coal will have to be used globally to meet the demand for power
·coal-based energy has propelled China forward
·the average person in China uses one third of
the energy that is used by the average person in Europe and one fifth of the
energy that is used by the average American
·Asian demand for electricity is growing, and
coal will be a “leading actor” in that growth
·there are many “forces” arrayed against
nuclear power
·cities cannot be built without steel, and
steel cannot be manufactured without coal
·China and India are building clean coal
technology plants, and the United States is lagging in this regard; these
plants use less coal and produce more power
·carbon capture and storage is the “path” to
reaching climate change goals
·carbon capture and storage principles need to
be applied to natural gas
JOBS & COMMERCE: REVITALIZING THE NORTH AMERICAN
ECONOMY
Jim Gehringer, ESRI
·jobs are uppermost in the mind of people and
policymakers
·data need to be turned into information, and
information is only valuable if it is acted upon
·data and information should be used to help
make decisions that are informed by evidence rather than by anecdotes
·it is not possible to “manipulate” one part
of the economy without considering the intended and unintended consequences
·protectionism can lead to reduced quality if
there are efforts designed to protect a sector from competition
·protectionism will not keep any country
competitive
·the world is moving toward service-based
economies
Jayson Myers, Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters
·two thirds of what is manufactured in Canada
is exported
·efforts should be directed to determining how
to keep markets open and goods “flowing”
·wealth is not created by borrowing “round and
round and round”; rather, wealth is created by providing the goods and services
that people want to purchase
·it is not possible to borrow your way to
prosperity
·there is a need to develop medium- and
long-term competitiveness strategies
·Mexico and Canada have a strong stake in US
prosperity
·supply chains are integrated in North
America, and these supply chains need “competitive infrastructure”; in fact,
supply chains are global
·it is not possible for Canada or the United
States to compete on the basis of cost; consequently, competition needs to
occur on the basis of specialization and differentiation from competitors
·governments and businesses do not create
jobs; rather, it is customers that create jobs
·the shared border between Canada and the
United States needs to be secure and efficient, and the countries need to focus
on minimizing regulatory differences
·in Canada, the federal government cannot
impose conditions on provincial/territorial or municipal governments regarding
procurement without causing a constitutional crisis
·local procurement restrictions distort
markets and investment decisions
·regarding the Buy American provisions in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the proposed American Jobs Act,
it should be noted that possibilities are not created when options are closed
off
·the agreement regarding procurement reached
by the Canadian and US federal governments was inadequate because of its
thresholds and time limit
Itzam de Gortari, TechBA
·countries benefit from the creation of
innovation hubs
·it is important to create an environment of
innovation for businesses
·most Mexican companies are horizontal, and
there is a need to make them vertical
·companies need to understand barriers to
entry, to test their market as soon as possible and to be ready to adapt
·Mexican companies want to compete on the
basis of quality rather than on the basis of cost
·Mexico has a cultural affinity with the
United States
·the three North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) countries are not a trading block and NAFTA is not about
trade; NAFTA is about production
·the three NAFTA countries are not three
countries and three economies; rather, the three countries share a single
economy
·NAFTA is a production block, with the three
countries making things together and then trading them to each other and to
other nations
·since the three NAFTA countries make things
together, harm to one of the countries causes harm to the other two countries
·the future of North American integration is
being impeded by politics
·border barriers are harmful, and can be
viewed as a penalty imposed on businesses on each side of the border that are
not imposed on other imports to the same extent
·NAFTA creates a relationship that is without
precedent in the modern world in terms and its breadth and depth
·a continental security perimeter is needed
·Washington, D.C. is “schizophrenic” about who
can and should “run” the border that the United States shares with Canada
·“controls” need to be moved away from the
border
·Canada and the United States are “in this
together” from both an economic and a security perspective
Erik Lee, North American Center for Transborder
Studies
·the relationships created by the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) are absolutely critical; one third of
the United States’ interaction with the world occurs with Canada and Mexico
·Canada is the United States’ first joint
production partner, while Mexico is its third
·with NAFTA, the benefits are broad and the
pains are felt by relatively few
·Canada is generally quite good with its
“ground game” in the United States through its consulates; Mexico is just
getting into this type of diplomacy
·US-Mexican trade is at a relatively
interesting point in its history
·the US Administration’s National Export
Initiative provides an excellent goal
Paul Storer, Western Washington University
·the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) is hitting its adolescence; adolescence is not always an easy time
·Canada’s Sir John A. MacDonald campaigned
against free trade with the United States
·NAFTA both increased and transformed trade;
following implemention of the agreement, trade grew more quickly than did gross
domestic product and more quickly in the areas where the largest barriers were
reduced
·imported goods are often a key ingredient
when manufacturing goods that will be exported
·at the beginning of this century, growth in
trade among the NAFTA countries began to slow for reasons that include:
Øthe
thickening of the United States’ border with Canada and with Mexico following
the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001
Øcompetition
from China, which joined the World Trade Organization in December 2001
Øregulatory
impediments to integration, such as proving rules of origin
·there have been a variety of policy responses
in response to slowed growth in trade among the NAFTA countries, including the
perimeter security and economic competitiveness agenda announced by Prime
Minister Harper and President Obama in February 2011, and enhanced border
infrastructure
·“one size fits all” is not the right solution
in respect of borders; different ports of entry have different problems, and
different problems require different solutions
·in the future, efforts should be directed to
common entry documents and to tariff systems that are more harmonized, such as
through similar classification systems
NORTH AMERICAN COOPERATION IN PUBLIC SAFETY & LAW
ENFORCEMENT
Gary King, Attorney General for the State of New
Mexico
·communication and cooperation are important
·organized crime operates without borders, and
those engaged in such activities cooperate and communicate with each other very
well; law enforcement must work together across borders in the same way,
otherwise they are at a “huge” disadvantage
·Mexican law enforcement officials are brave,
and they continue to do their job as their friends and colleagues are
assassinated
·the fight against international crime cannot
be won in only a year or two
·the fight against crime is assisted by
efforts to stop the flow of money across borders
Rommel Moreno Manjarrez, Attorney General for the
State of Baja California
·some challenges are global
·citizens do not distinguish among federal,
state and municipal governments when it comes to assigning responsibility
·reforms are under way regarding the war
against crime:
Øbest
practices are being “borrowed”
Øtraining
is occurring
Øcrime
scene investigation is improving
Øinformation
is being exchanged
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Janis G. Johnson, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group