From 29 June to 1 July 2008, the
Honourable Donald Oliver, Q.C. represented the Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group (IPG) at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Western
Governors’ Association (WGA) in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
The WGA includes the Governors from 19
western US states (see the Appendix) as well as from American Samoa, Guam and
the Northern Mariana Islands. Canadian Premiers from the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba also participate in the WGA’s
activities. In attendance at this meeting were the Premiers of the four Western
provinces, as well as Governors Freudenthal, Wyoming; Huntsman, Utah;
Napolitano, Arizona; Ritter, Colorado; Otter, Idaho; Schwietzer, Montana;
Heineman, Nebraska; Rounds, South Dakota; Gregoire, Washington and Richardson,
New Mexico. At the meeting, Senator Oliver spoke to the Premiers as well as to
Governors Freudenthal, Ritter, Schweitzer and Rounds.
The WGA uses six basic strategies in
achieving its goals: develop and communicate regional policy; serve as a
leadership forum; build regional capacity; conduct research and disseminate
findings; form coalitions and partnerships; and build public understanding and
support for regional issues and policy positions.
The 19 states in the WGA are important
to the Canada-US relationship. Of the estimated 7.1 million US jobs that depend on bilateral trade, almost 2.4 million of those jobs are located in the WGA
states; trade between Canada and these states recently was valued at more than
$111 billion annually. In addition to trade, tourism is also important.
According to recent estimates, more than 4.1 million residents of the WGA
region travelled to Canada in a one-year period, spending almost $2.1 billion.
Moreover, more than 7.2 million Canadians travelled to the 19 WGA states in
that same period and spent more than $3.6 billion.
The WGA’s 2008 Annual Meeting included
four plenary sessions:
·Protecting Wildlife Corridors in the West
·Managing Water in the West
·Transmission Expansion – When, Where, How Much?
and
·Energy and Climate Change.
The interaction with Governors enables
members of the IPG to achieve better the aim of finding points of convergence
in respective national policies, initiating dialogue on points of divergence,
encouraging exchanges of information and promoting better understanding on
shared issues of concern. Moreover, meetings with Governors provide the members
of the IPG with an important means to provide input to, and gather information
about, state-level issues that affect Canada.
This report summarizes the discussions
that occurred at the plenary sessions.
PROTECTING WILDLIFE CORRIDORS IN THE
WEST
The focus of the plenary session was
the actions needed to protect and sustain wildlife corridors and habitat in
view of threats related to population growth, climate change, and
infrastructure, land use and energy development.
Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior
·residents of the US West are stewards of vast
and beautiful lands, and they are facing ongoing and escalating challenges,
including fires that come earlier and last longer, drought, diminishing habitat
for species such as the sage grouse and a range of issues related to the
urban-rural interface
·often, “world-class” wildlife habitat sits above
“world-class” energy reserves; there is no need for them to be mutually
exclusive
·President Bush’s recent Healthy Lands Initiative
is designed to maintain healthy landscapes, sustain wildlife and secure energy
in a holistic approach to natural resource management and restoration in eight
states in the US West
·multidirectional drilling reduces the acreage
footprint
·in the future, energy supplies must come from
traditional as well as from renewable resources
·water is a precious finite resource, and is more
precious than gold for someone who is thirsty
·the future has enormous challenges as well as
enormous opportunities; there are many best practices from which everyone can
learn and benefit
Mr. Jack Dangermond, ESRI, Inc.
·the American West is characterized by open
spaces and wildlife that are worth preserving and maintaining
·the changes being experienced in the US West are
largely driven by human actions, such as energy development, population growth
and transportation changes, among others
·wildlife habitat is disappearing rapidly, which
has implications for species
·there is a need to be more thoughtful in guiding
future development, and to use better information in order to make better
decisions
·humans and nature – including urban development
and nature – must “co-evolve,” and it should be recognized that each of us is
part of the “human footprint”
·since habitats do not stop at state boundaries,
states must collaborate and cooperate; collaboration and cooperation must also
occur between states and the federal government
·information that can be used across boundaries,
and that can assist in the making of informed tradeoffs, is needed; information
should be consistent, include systematic inventories that are integrated into
regulatory and other systems, use a common vocabulary, and include a
conservation and development plan
·technology and methods are available now, but a
broader, deeper penetration is needed
·information systems can help decision makers to
avoid, minimize and mitigate
·efforts to protect wildlife corridors will help
to create a more secure future
Mr. Steve Elbert, BP America
·energy is required in order to sustain human
life and our standard of living
·a diverse energy supply is a more secure energy
supply
·regarding energy development, the first question
should be whether development should occur; debate on this question is driven
by the values that people hold in their heart
·high energy prices are a consequence of too
little supply and too much demand; they also reflect past decisions that were,
and that were not, made
·global competition for energy is intensifying,
which will place continued upward pressure on energy prices
·much can be done to encourage conservation and
to provide greater incentives for renewable energy
·high energy prices are likely to continue for
the foreseeable future because of:
§the forces of energy supply and demand
§a relatively higher cost of renewable energy when compared to
traditional energy, at least for a period of time
§carbon pricing
·stakeholders should work together in order to
produce the energy that is needed in a manner that is compatible with
environmental goals and wildlife habitat preservation
·ongoing efforts to reduce our environmental
footprint must occur
·the benefits of extended-reach drilling include:
§lower costs
§efficiency gains
§reduced impact on habitat and wildlife
§smaller surface footprint
·states play an important role in creating
frameworks as well as in establishing limits and guidelines
·wildlife corridors should be a consideration
when resource development decisions are made
·it should be recognized that it is not always
possible both to develop traditional energy resources and to protect wildlife
and habitat
·people may share the same goals but have
different thoughts about how best to accomplish those goals
·we get better over time because we use the
lessons learned in the past to improve the way things are done in the future
Mr. Tom Brokaw, NBC News
·although the US West is an exhilarating and
challenging environment, life can be difficult
·the rest of the US is now looking to the West in
a way that it has not done since the 19th century; it is examining
the actions that the West is taking in such areas as climate change, energy,
water, immigration and population growth, among others
·there is a need to think regionally and in a
bipartisan manner; in order to thrive and survive, more cooperation and a
greater shared vision are required
·human desires and needs must be balanced with
those of nature
·the world is changing, and there are
opportunities to ensure that the changes are for the better
MANAGING WATER IN THE WEST
The focus of the plenary session was
challenges faced by Western water suppliers in the US West resulting from
population growth and climate change, as well as the strategies needed to help
Western states reduce conflicts, mitigate the impacts of water shortages,
manage water resources and plan for sustainable future water supplies.
Mr. Brad Udall, University of Colorado and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
·although reputable groups have issued credible
reports on the subject of climate change, some people continue to believe that
climate change is not occurring
·there is a connection between water and energy;
considerations in respect of the water-energy nexus include:
§water is heavy
§there is no water without energy
§many projects use electricity
§saving water means saving energy in terms of water heating,
treatment, etc.
·regarding new water projects, key questions are:
how much energy is required? and what type of energy is required?
·regarding new energy projects, a key question
is: how much water is required?
·there is a connection between water and climate
change; water planning must consider the changing climate, which is altering
the water cycle
·climate change results in higher temperatures;
higher temperatures lead to more evaporation, heavier downpours (with regional
winners and losers), longer periods between downpours, more and longer-lasting
droughts, more floods, more rain, less snow and a rising sea level
·there are a number of possible strategies to
deal with climate change, including:
§mitigate greenhouse gas emissions
§adapt
§suffer
·water is a zero-sum game in many parts of the US
West and, with climate change, is a negative-sum game in some parts
·the Great Lakes compact would preclude water
diversion to the American Southwest
·the US’ driest states are in the West
·with reduced snow melt-off and increased
droughts, there are more fires
·recreational economies are growing in the US
West
·data are critical, and better climate models are
needed; current models operate at a level that is far too big for local
decisions
·people must “get serious” about water; water is
too inexpensive, and under-pricing results in over-consumption and
under-investment
·since technology to clean up water is available,
re-use should be pursued as an option for both potable and non-potable uses
Mr. Duane Smith, Oklahoma Water Resources Board
·historically, water rights were developed in
order to ensure economic development, without specific consideration given to
sustainability or environmental protection; although it is difficult to change
from a paradigm of economic development to another view, the realization that
sustainability and environmental protection are important requires that a
paradigm shift occur
·the Water Needs and Strategies for a
Sustainable Future: Next Steps report contains a number of key
recommendations, including:
§the Western States Water Council should enter into a formal
agreement to create a Western states federal agency support team, which would
change the nature of federal interaction with Western states and provide states
with a focal point for discussion with the federal government and its agencies
§the Western Governors’ Association should urge the US Congress to
require federal water resource agencies to include integrated water resources
planning and assistance as one of their primary missions, with state leadership
being supported by federal assistance
TRANSMISSION EXPANSION – WHEN,
WHERE, HOW MUCH?
The focus of the plenary session was
reasons for the limited number of electricity transmission grids under
construction coincident with an unprecedented number of proposals to build new
transmission lines, actions that can be taken by governments to expedite the
construction of transmission capabilities, and future electric generation
resources in light of public policies limiting carbon dioxide emissions.
Mr. Jeff Sterba, PNM Resources
·clean and diversified energy is a priority for
the future
·since it is not possible to do one without the
other and be cost-effective, generation and transmission should be integrated
·reliability is a key priority for consumers
·in an environment of increasing costs, the term
“affordability” must be redefined; the era of inexpensive energy is over
·a significant proportion of the resources that
will be needed in the future do not yet exist, and these resources should have
low emissions
·there is no “energy silver bullet,” and
solutions to future energy needs should include enhanced energy efficiency, new
renewable energy sources and a portfolio of technologies
·wind and solar power are major, low-cost energy
sources; location and economic considerations are important in increasing their
production
·since the best wind resources are not near
population centres, transmission is important
·coal is a plentiful resource in the US, and must remain a viable part of the energy mix; in this context, carbon capture and
storage is a critical tool
·nuclear power must be retained as an option
·increased investments in private and public
energy technology should occur
·a national strategy, for the pricing of carbon
rather than a state-by-state or regional approach is needed
·at present, renewable portfolio standards are
not consistent or coherent across states
·developing mandates and initiatives is not
enough: they must be implemented
Mr. David Sokol, MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company
·global climate change is a multigenerational
issue
·in the future, there should be a greater focus
on energy efficiency, the use of renewable energy to the greatest extent
possible, a reduction in siting and transmission roadblocks, and increased
investments in technology development and the deployment of commercially proven
technologies
·a cap-and-trade system is a tool, rather than a
policy, to aid in the resolution of emissions challenges; a policy that
incorporates tools is needed
Mr. Michael Niggli, San Diego Gas & Electric Company
·electricity flows at the speed of light, and is
a companion to a clean environment
·an interconnected electricity grid is a high
priority; the interdependence of networks, and the benefits that result from
interdependence, should be recognized
·the cost of new transmission is driven by such
factors as the cost of land, the cost of labour and the quality of the resource
·a renewable energy credit-trading market should
be created
Mr. John Fielder, Southern California Edison
·in California, wind, solar, biomass and
geothermal power exist
·California leads the US in energy efficiency
·solar power continues to be relatively expensive
·at present, California has no nuclear plant, and
no plant can be built until the issue of nuclear waste is resolved; nuclear
power must be part of the future energy mix
·the link between the profitability of utilities
and electricity usage must be severed
·consumers should have an incentive to use less
electricity
·energy efficiency is the least expensive form of
energy
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
The focus of the plenary session was
state actions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, the challenges and
opportunities associated with climate change, and how to ensure that the US
Congress, the next Administration and federal agencies understand Western
issues as federal climate policy is being developed.
Mr. Erik Peterson, Center for Strategic and International Studies
·we live in a world of accelerating change, and
there are seven revolutions – or critical drivers of change – that will be
important in the future; they are related to:
§population
§resources
§technology
§information
§integration
§conflict
§governance
·by 2025, the global population is expected to
grow from about 6.5 billion today to approximately 7.9 billion individuals; by
2050, this number may grow to 9.2 billion
·there is an expanding spectrum of
high-population-growth countries as well as dozens of countries experiencing
depopulation; for some countries, immigration will increase significantly,
giving rise to economic, commercial, and security and stability issues
·by 2025, the US will import 70% of its oil, an
increase from the 36% that was imported during the 1973 Arab oil embargo
·there is a need to focus on strategic resource
management, including in respect of water, energy and food; constraints exist
regarding arable land, land degradation, water shortages and global warming,
all of which affect agricultural production
·China is likely to
surpass the United States as a user of energy
·there will be continued dependence on oil, gas
and coal for the foreseeable future
·food, water and energy issues have
sustainability and environmental aspects
·when land becomes degraded, the extinction of
species becomes a concern
·there are likely to be interstate conflicts,
including regarding water
·supercomputers can compute 280 trillion
calculations per second, and knowledge expansion through technology is too
large to quantify
·at present, there are 16.5 million blogs, and
that number doubles every five months
·information and data move easily around the
world
·we live in a knowledge-intense environment, and
human capital is increasingly perishable
·“we choose our truth”: we filter the data and
information we encounter in order to separate what is “right” from what is
“wrong”
·by 2015, 80% of all current technology will be
replaced
·by 2025, Brazil, Russia, India and China – the
BRIC countries – together will have an aggregate economy that is 50% the size
of the aggregate economy of the US, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France
and Italy, and by 2040 the aggregate economy of the four BRIC countries will
surpass the size of the aggregate economy of the six countries noted; economic
integration is expected to transform the world
·global economic integration is resulting in
increased cross-border movements of goods, services, capital and labour
·at present, 120 countries or groups are
developing information warfare systems, and cyberwarfare will be a major future
threat
·terrorists are likely to use the attacks of 11
September 2001 as a “standard of success”
·when responding to disasters, recovery and
continuity plans are important
·institutional capacity to respond “real time” is
needed
·opportunities should be exploited and risks
should be mitigated
·companies should determine "what they stand
for" beyond profits and internal operating efficiency
·coalitions that cross traditional spheres of
interest and influence may be important in the future; the future involves a
system of linkages that no previous generation has had to face
·we have a leveraged future in front of us, with
both “hyper-promise” and “hyper-peril;” leveraged leadership will be needed
Mr. Jeffrey Immelt, General Electric
·there are four pillars of competitiveness:
§education
§health care
§financial innovation
§energy
·the price of energy is likely to remain
relatively high for some time
·in respect of energy, there is a “fear factor”:
who owns the oil? who are energy “haves” and who are energy “have nots”?
·the market will not solve all problems, since it
does not fully price security, infrastructure, etc.
·leaders, including Governors, must drive the solutions
of the future
·at the present time, there are a number of
important “philosophies,” including:
§energy security means energy diversity
§every new technology must be commercialized
§global warming must be addressed
·there are three strategies – or levers – that
organizations and/or governments can embrace regarding clean energy and clean
water:
§innovation and technology are the solutions
§clean energy is a growth industry that creates jobs and can give a
competitive advantage
§a supportive public policy needs to exist in respect of the two
strategies above
·there is a need to invest in research and
development, since innovation, venture capital and technology can drive massive
change
·investments should be made in:
§energy efficiency, especially in respect of core products
§conservation, including LEDs and hybrid vehicles
§renewable energy, including in wind and solar power as well as to
achieve scale
§exploration, including sub-sea oil and gas
§“big bet” base load technology, including coal gasification,
new-generation nuclear reactors, and carbon capture and storage
§distribution, including a more efficient and better grid
§clean water, including desalinization and zero-liquid discharge
§venture capital, which is nascent but growing
§the commercialization of technology
·innovation can be used to create economic growth
·clean energy and clean water are growth
industries, and there are opportunities to export green technologies and
products; if the US does not do so, then some other country or countries will
do so
·Governors will drive change and shape policy in
the future
·renewable portfolio standards have been
effective in driving change
·through supportive public policies, Governors
should endorse and support “big bet” technologies
·Governors should update regulatory frameworks in
respect of siting, permitting, transmission, distribution and water rights
·Canada should be
included in the solutions in respect of coal, gas and uranium, among other
areas
·there is a need to support education and to use
universities to launch an entrepreneurial culture
·energy policy should consider:
§the energy mix
§standards, including renewable portfolio standards
§incentives to reduce cost and increase security
§goals regarding reduced greenhouse gas emissions
·in some areas, technology exists but is unproven
customers want benefits without risks
Respectfully
submitted,
Hon. Jerahmiel Grafstein, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Dean Del Mastro, M.P.
Acting Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group