Sukh Dhaliwal, M.P. represented the
Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) as an
observer at the 33rd Regional Conference of the Caribbean, The
Americas and The Atlantic Region of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
held at the Cuisinart Resort & Spa, Anguilla from June 28th to
July 3rd, 2008. Other attendees included:
Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas Barbados
Bermuda British Virgin
Islands
Cayman Islands Dominica
Guyana Jamaica
Monserrat St. Kitts
Nevis St. Lucia
Trinidad and Tobago Turks and Caicos Islands
United Kingdom (observer status)
Hosted by the Anguilla Branch of the CPA, the conference
had delegates considering its theme “The Role of the Legislature in Controlling
and/or Contributing to over-development.” The conference was honoured to
receive many distinguished guests, such as the Hon. Robert Hughes, senior
member of the opposition in Anguilla.
The opening ceremony included an address from David
Carty, Honourable Speaker of the Anguilla House of Assembly, Chairman of the
Regional CPA and President of the Anguilla Branch. Mr. Carty emphasized that
the CPA makes up for the often limited training available to Parliamentarians.
Through his peers, he was able to develop the skills that make for a good
Speaker. He also suggested that there is a worrisome trend of opposition
parliamentarians being supplanted by non-governmental organizations and the
media, and that parliamentarians need to consider whether the opposition has
adequate powers to fulfill its democratic responsibilities.
Planned events for the attendees included an island
tour, eight issue sessions and several social events, which facilitated many
noteworthy exchanges between delegates. During the course of the conference the
delegates discussed the topical regional and international issues in order to
promote change for future generations. A range of topics were covered in the
sessions:
·Session 1: “True independence of the legislature is more urgent
now because of the current state of development in our territories” (Jamaica)
·Session 2: “The legislature is not well placed to promote
social/policy development and must therefore be content to ensure that laws are
passed in accordance with established rules” (Trinidad & Tobago)
·Session 3: “How essential is education on offshore finance and
technology to the legislature in responding adequately to development issues” (Cayman Islands)
·Session 4: “Development has led to such a modification of our
culture that we are in danger of loosing that which makes us a unique Caribbean
people” (Barbados)
·Session 5: “A real look at the effects of over-development and
practical safeguards to address same” (British Virgin Islands)
·Session 6: “How do we tell the difference between growing pains
of development and the existence of over-development” (Anguilla)
·Session 7: “Foreign investment: Is it more a liability than an
asset in our countries” (Bermuda)
·Session 8: “The impact of climate change on development” (Anguilla)
The central theme of the conference was
over-development, which is a topical question in the rapidly-growing Caribbean
nations. The large numbers of big hotel and resort developments underway on
these islands are producing rapid changes.
These nations recognize that they need development to
grow their economy and improve their quality of life, but they are struggling
to keep pace with their infrastructure and social services. The host, Anguilla, is facing especially acute infrastructure challenges. Creating proper sewage and
garbage disposal is a particular problem for several states.
The Caribbean nations are also experiencing rapid
changes in their culture and population backgrounds, causing them to question
whether some changes are occurring too quickly. Crime has emerged as a major
concern in the Bahamas.
There is an emerging consensus in the Caribbean that a
proper planning process needs to be in place to meet these challenges, and that
this process must be accountable and transparent. They increasingly appreciate
the importance of consultation to ensure that development is balanced.
There was, however, disagreement on the ability of the
legislature to drive new social policy. There was also a recognition that
women need to play a larger role in the male-centric Caribbean parliaments and
that they should be given management responsibility for economically important
portfolios, like industry and finance, and not just social portfolios.
Two sessions, one presented by the Cayman Islands and
one by Bermuda, considered the importance and impact of foreign direct
investment (FDI) on the development of island nations. Many of their citizens
are not certain that FDI is a liability or an asset for their communities.
There is a perception that people come and take advantage of their community.
The only taxes some firms pay are the import duties on their goods, leaving
many wondering if they are contributing their fair share.
While there is a need for increased levels of corporate
social responsibility among investors, some are proposing that firms be asked
to take a greater role in the community by offering scholarships to locals.
This is seen as a way to improve the education and skill level of local
populations.
Many rich immigrants are buying up of all the best land
in the Caribbean, leaving less and less for locals. It has led to a boom in the
construction of large estates of rich foreigners. The reduced availability of
land is impoverishing some locals.
Another session, presented by Barbados, focused on the
effects of development on local culture. Many CPA members are concerned about
losing their Caribbean culture because of a wave of immigration that is
changing the ethnic and cultural makeup of their countries. There was,
however, substantial disagreement and discussion of this issue.
The population of the Caribbean is increasing rapidly
and many countries do not have enough schools in place to handle the bulge.
There is a shortage of proper training for the teachers that they do have. The
situation is seen as a threat not only to education levels, but also to their
ability to maintain their culture.
The conference highlighted the importance of public
policy focusing on children, education and social disruptions. Delegates felt
that both social and physical infrastructure are important for cultural
development.
The final session of the conference, presented by Anguilla, discussed the impact of climate change on development. While many economists
have considered the environment to be something of a luxury good that only rich
nations can afford, the conference revealed a different reality: even for
underdeveloped nations, the environment is emerging as a key issue.
The delegates from the Caribbean were worried about the
future that they are leaving for their children and grandchildren. They
emphasized that there is a need for tax incentives to finance investment in
green technology and innovation. The major concerns in the region are fossil
fuels, agriculture and land use.
Global warming was seen as the greatest ecological
threat to humanity. Kent Hughes Butts, an analyst with the US Army, said that
climate change has surfaced as a critical security issue in the post-Cold War
era.
The effect of global warming on water levels is critical
for Caribbean nations because rises in the water level can destroy beaches that
are their key economic drivers; further increases could even wipe some nations
off the map.
As a Canadian observer, I was able to relate some of the
key lessons that Canadians have learned about the environment. We recognize
that our behavior has to change. There is increasing recognition that appeals
are simply not enough to achieve the kind of change that is required. Instead,
what is essential is that we put a price on pollution and stop letting
polluters use our atmosphere as a free garbage dump. We can do this by
reducing taxes on things we want more of, like income and investment, and shifting
those taxes to things we want less of, like pollution and waste. This can be
good for the planet and for voters’ wallets. There was widespread agreement
among delegates on these points.
There is a need for innovative solutions, courage and
commitment on the environment. Delegates were confident that you don’t need to
sacrifice the economy for the environment, and that both economic prosperity
and environmental sustainability can be achieved at same time.
As this was the first Commonwealth Parliamentary
Association conference I have attended, I believe the CPA and its members must
be commended for contributing to the advancement of parliamentary democracy by
enhancing knowledge and understanding of democratic governance.
Parliamentarians attending the conference were enriched and played an important
role in promoting a plethora of fundamental issues.
On the whole, I was greatly impressed by the quality of
the presentations and the depth of the discussions. By networking with each
other and learning from other members’ experiences, parliamentarians were able
to achieve common goals and contribute in a substantial manner. I would also
like to take this opportunity to thank Anguilla and the Anguilla CPA for their
warmth and wonderful hospitality, which as I discovered is typical of the
culture of Caribbean people. In addition, I would also like to extend my
appreciation to CPA Canadian Branch for their efforts in ensuring the success
of the conference.
Respectfully submitted,
Mr. Russ Hiebert, M.P.,
Chair for Mr. Sukh Dhaliwal, M.P.
Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA)