The parliamentary delegation of the
Canadian Branch of the Assemblée parlementaire de la Francophonie (APF) that attended the APF Parliamentary Affairs Committee held in Sofia (Bulgaria) from May 22 to 24, 2007, has the honor to present its Report. The
delegation was made up of the Honorable Pierre De Bané, Senator and
Committee Chair; he was accompanied by Mr. Jean Michel Roy, Executive
Secretary of the Branch.
The following branches were
represented: Andorra, Bulgaria, Canada, France, the French Community of
Belgium, Gabon, Jura, Macedonia, Mali, Morocco, Niger, Romania, Switzerland and Valle D’Aosta.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Prior to the commencement of the
Committee’s work, the Deputy Chairman of the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria, Mr. Younal Lyoutfi, welcomed the participants.
Statement by the Committee Chair
Senator Pierre De Bané, Chair of the
Committee, presented a brief summary of the Committee’s mandate and of its
activities. The Parliamentary Affairs Committee has a distinctive feature, in
comparison with the three other APF committees. In addition to substantive
reports, it examines the status reports of the interparliamentary cooperation
programs. The APF indeed implements interparliamentary cooperation programs in
collaboration with the Agence intergouvernementale de la Francophonie.
Among these is the Noria program, which
seeks to meet the need to develop capacity in producing, managing and
disseminating internal legislative information in certain southern hemisphere
francophone parliaments. In addition, a program to support the creation of the
assemblies’ Internet sites was conducted in 1999‑2000. Although limited
by a specific timeframe, the program resulted in the launch of the new websites
of the assemblies of Gabon, Cameroon, Guinea, Mali and Niger and the training of their webmasters.
Moreover, there are two different
training programs: parliamentary seminars based on the principle of the
exchange of experience between senior parliamentary lecturers and parliamentarians
in their first mandate, as legislative elections in southern hemisphere
countries often entail a wide-scale turnover of parliamentarians; and the
training sessions intended for parliamentary officials.
Finally, there is the Parlement
francophone des jeunes, held every two years during the session, and a new
program to support the Parlements nationaux des jeunes which was set up
during the 2004‑2005 biennium.
The Committee also monitors the
electoral observation missions of La Francophonie in which APF parliamentarians participate, and created an internal working group tasked with
reflecting on the participation of the APF in these missions.
The following reports were then
presented:
International refugee protection
Ms. Martine Bondo (Gabon) presented the report. She stated that in order to consolidate peace in a world in
constant flux, parliamentarians had to play the role which is incumbent upon
them, i.e. that of submitting arguments to their respective parliaments within La Francophonie in order to anticipate and prevent massive population movements in the
world’s trouble spots. In order to achieve this, an early warning system should
be put in place and a team of international observers should be deployed to
detect potential problems and attempt to resolve them before they degenerate
into conflict.
Ms. Bondo was of the opinion that
these efforts would be useful, but that it is incumbent upon governments and
national and international political authorities to be responsible for making
appropriate political decisions in order to find solutions to these problems.
In conclusion, Ms. Bondo made the
following statement: “It is very important that we take this concern to heart,
because today’s neighbour may well become tomorrow’s refugee.”
Electoral observation missions
Ms. Françoise Schepmans (French
Community of Belgium) presented the electoral observation missions status
report, which monitored the missions the APF took part in since the last
session in July 2006. This document reported on the observation missions
of the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) in the following countries:
·Democratic Republic of the Congo. First ballot of the presidential election and legislative ballot
held on July 30, 2006; second ballot of the presidential election and
provincial elections held on October 29, 2006; experts from Canada were in attendance.
·Mauritania.
Legislative and municipal elections held on November 19, 2006; first
ballot of the March 11, 2007 presidential election and second ballot of
the March 25, 2007 presidential election.
·Senegal.
February 25, 2007 presidential election, also with the participation of
Canadian experts.
Ms. Michèle André (France) presented the report of the Review Panel on Electoral Observation Missions. The
report took the form of an assessment and set out the main criticisms expressed
on the participation of the APF in the observation missions organized by the
OIF.
·The APF repeatedly deplores that it is informed
too late to be able to send observers.
·The OIF determines the number of
parliamentarians who will participate in the various missions, thus depriving
the APF of the possibility of choosing the missions it wishes to participate
in.
·The visibility of La Francophonie as compared to the large contingents deployed by the European Union or
the OSCE, who are more selective but send larger missions.
·The francophone observation missions are based
on the principle of responding to the invitation of the country concerned.
·The observation missions are not prohibitive but
do entail considerable expenses.
·The concrete observation modalities should be
updated in light of the experience of the past 15 years.
·The observation is generally limited to the
conditions in which the balloting takes place.
In reply to these criticisms, Ms. André
proposed the following recommendations which could be implemented with the OIF:
·Promote synergy. Since the APF cannot be present
at every steps of the electoral process, it would be good to promote synergy.
Thus, the reports of the experts sent by the OIF before the election could be
conveyed to the APF secretariat, which could distribute them to the members of
the mission.
·Plan the missions. The APF could participate in
selecting the elections to be observed, which could result in the real planning
of the missions being considered for the year.
·Reaffirm the paramount role played by
parliamentarians in observing elections. Indeed, determining whether an
election was reliable and transparent cannot be limited to observing whether
electors voted or not. A judgment must be brought to bear on an evolving
process which is a material step, albeit an imperfect one, toward democracy.
The unique competency and expertise that parliamentarians contribute give them
considerable moral authority in this area.
·Give La Francophonie greater visibility. The status of electoral observation should be enhanced and given increased media
attention.
·Improve follow-up through better-targeted
sanctions or cooperation measures.
·Strengthen the support mechanisms and devote
greater attention to the logistical organization of these missions.
In addition, the following
recommendations conducive to the adoption of a rigorous methodology could be
implemented with the APF itself.
·Make a prior selection of the missions the APF
wishes to participate in in light of several criteria (political situation,
credibility of the electoral process, etc.).
·Make rules to govern the designation of
candidates: rigorously select observers by giving preference to those who have
a good knowledge of the country, and provide them with the necessary
information to accomplish their mission.
·Prepare a short observation guide for
parliamentarians.
·Prepare a biennial calendar of elections with
the observers selected.
Parliamentary seminars and training
sessions
Ms. Ramatou Rahimou (Niger)presented the report. Since its last meeting in Rabat (Morocco) in July 2006, the APF held two parliamentary seminars, one in the Central African Republic and one in Haiti, and organized a training session for parliamentary officials.
In October 2006, in Bangui (Central African Republic), a parliamentary seminar was held on the main theme “The
Powers of Parliament”. This seminar was organized in cooperation with the
Central African Parliament for that country’s parliamentarians.
The seminar dealt more specifically with
the following themes: the legislative power of Parliament; parliamentary
control; and the role of the majority and of the opposition in parliamentary
work.
In March 2007 in Port-au-Prince,
in the Republic of Haiti, a seminar on the main theme of “Democracy and Good
Governance” was held. That seminar was organized in cooperation with the
Parliament of Haiti for that country’s parliamentarians.
The seminar dealt more specifically with
the following themes: the legislative function of Parliament; the parliamentary
control function; the mechanisms of government stability, and parliamentary
political groups.
Wednesday,
May 23, 2007
The
life of assemblies in the francophone world: A compilation of parliamentary
procedures and practices
Ms. Michèle
André (France) presented the synthesis report of Chapter II, which deals
with the parliamentary mandate.
This chapter groups the information
found in the Branch contributions that describe the main characteristics of the
parliamentary mandate as conceived in francophone parliaments. It is a
compendium of heterogeneous data on an array of topics from electoral regimes,
to the duration of mandates or the immunities that parliamentarians enjoy in fulfilling
their roles, whether they be members of Parliament, or, in bicameral
parliaments, senators.
The Canadian Branch has already sent in
its contribution to chapters 1 to 4.
The Parlement francophone des
jeunes (PFJ) and youth national parliaments
Ms. Martine Bondo (Gabon) presented the report. Thus, in keeping with the APF Bureau decision, young
participants in the fourth PFJ session which will take place in Libreville (Gabon) in July will break up into four committees with responsibilities
identical to those of the APF committees, each one tasked with working on a
text in its relevant field of jurisdiction. The themes selected are the
following:
·Political Committee: Youth and the prevention of conflicts.
·Education, Communications and Cultural
Affairs Committee: Francophone youth, migratory
problems, and HIV/AIDS.
·Parliamentary Affairs Committee:Getting young people onto voters’
lists.
·Cooperation and Development Committee: In the face of many migratory movements, what immigration policies
should be defined for the future? The point of view of francophone youth.
In addition, Ms. Bondo informed
the Committee that the new OIF budget programming has meant that the APF programs
dedicated to youth have been considerably reduced. These programs are thus
affected by the budgetary stringency imposed on the OIF. However, the OIF wants
to see those programs maintained.
In conclusion, Ms. Bondo indicated
that for the next PFJ, 26 branches had confirmed their participation, and
among them were Canada, New Brunswick and Quebec.
The
Noria Program
Senator Pierre
De Bané and Ms. Mireille Eza, Director of the Noria Program, presented the
report.
The Noria program was created in
July 2002 at the meeting of the APF Bureau in Bern (Switzerland) for the
purpose of meeting the needs of certain francophone parliaments of the southern
hemisphere by developing capacity in the area of the management of legislative
information. The program is funded by the Agence Intergouvernementale de la Francophonie. Today,
the Noria program has been implemented in nine parliaments, four of which are
bicameral, for a total of 13 chambers altogether.
Three types of support are proposed:
·“General support” to improve the management of
parliamentary information by putting legislative information services online.
The implementation of that initiative has begun in Benin, Burkina Faso, in the Congo (National Assembly and Senate) and in Madagascar (National Assembly
and Senate).
·“Special support” intended for parliaments that
make only moderate use of French. The objective of that support is to
facilitate the dissemination of French-language legislative production through
the translation of the Internet sites, endowment for French language
documentation and the funding of French-language training for parliamentarians
and administrative personnel. This support has been extended to the Assemblies
of Cap-Verde, Cambodia, Macedonia, Tunisia and Vietnam.
·“Network support” dedicated to the development
of professional interparliamentary networks through the use of information and
communication technologies.
The next meeting of the Committee will
take place on July 4 in the context of the proceedings of the
XXXIII Session of the APF in Libreville (Gabon).
Respectfully
submitted,
Pierre
De Bané, Senator
Member of the Canadian Branch of the APF