Skip to main content

Bill C-98

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

PDF

2nd Session, 35th Parliament,
45-46 Elizabeth II, 1996-97

The House of Commons of Canada

BILL C-

An Act to amend the Canada Evidence Act and the Criminal Code in respect of persons with disabilities, to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act in respect of persons with disabilities and other matters and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

Preamble

Whereas the Parliament of Canada affirms the dignity and worth of all individuals and seeks to strengthen their right to make for themselves the kind of life they wish to have through the removal of barriers to their full participation in society;

Whereas for individuals and groups that are disadvantaged identical treatment does not always lead to equality, and positive measures to remove discriminatory barriers may be necessary to help to ensure equality and to enable members of all groups to participate equally in the workplace and in access to goods, services, facilities and accommodation;

Whereas accommodating the needs of persons with disabilities is particularly important to ensure that they can be full participants in and contributors to Canadian society;

And Whereas the Parliament of Canada is committed to ensuring equal access to the criminal justice system for persons with disabilities;

NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:

PART 1

AMENDMENTS RELATED TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

R.S., c. C-5; R.S., c. 27 (1st Supp.), c. 19 (3rd Supp.); 1992, cc. 1, 47; 1993, cc. 28, 34; 1994, c. 44; 1995, c. 28

Canada Evidence Act

1. Section 6 of the Canada Evidence Act is replaced by the following:

Evidence of person with physical disability

6. (1) If a witness has difficulty communicating by reason of a physical disability, the court may order that the witness be permitted to give evidence by any means that enables the evidence to be intelligible.

Evidence of person with mental disability

(2) If a witness with a mental disability is determined under section 16 to have the capacity to give evidence and has difficulty communicating by reason of a disability, the court may order that the witness be permitted to give evidence by any means that enables the evidence to be intelligible.

Inquiry

(3) The court may conduct an inquiry to determine if the means by which a witness may be permitted to give evidence under subsection (1) or (2) is necessary and reliable.

Identification of accused

6.1 For greater certainty, a witness may give evidence as to the identity of an accused whom the witness is able to identify visually or in any other sensory manner.

R.S., c. C-46; R.S., cc. 2, 11, 27, 31, 47, 51, 52 (1st Supp.), cc. 1, 24, 27, 35 (2nd Supp.), cc. 10, 19, 30, 34 (3rd Supp.), cc. 1, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 40, 42, 50 (4th Supp.); 1989, c. 2; 1990, cc. 15, 16, 17, 44; 1991, cc. 1, 4, 28, 40, 43; 1992, cc. 1, 11, 20, 21, 22, 27, 38, 41, 47, 51; 1993, cc. 7, 25, 28, 34, 37, 40, 45, 46; 1994, cc. 12, 13, 38, 44; 1995, cc. 5, 19, 22, 27, 29, 32, 39, 42; 1996, cc. 8, 16, 19, 31, 34

Criminal Code

2. The Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after section 153:

Sexual exploitation of person with disability

153.1 (1) Every person who is in a position of trust or authority towards a person with a mental or physical disability or who is a person with whom a person with a mental or physical disability is in a relationship of dependency and who, without the consent of the person with the disability, for a sexual purpose, invites, counsels or incites the person with the disability to touch, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, the body of any person, including the body of the person who so invites, counsels or incites and the body of the person with the disability, is guilty of

    (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or

    (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

Definition of ``consent''

(2) Subject to subsection (3), ``consent'' means, for the purposes of this section, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.

When no consent obtained

(3) No consent is obtained, for the purposes of this section, if

    (a) the agreement is expressed by the words or conduct of a person other than the complainant;

    (b) the complainant is incapable of consenting to the activity;

    (c) the accused invites, counsels or incites the complainant to engage in the activity by abusing a position of trust, power or authority;

    (d) the complainant expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to engage in the activity; or

    (e) the complainant, having consented to engage in sexual activity, expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to continue to engage in the activity.

Subsection (3) not limiting

(4) Nothing in subsection (3) shall be construed as limiting the circumstances in which no consent is obtained.

When belief in consent not a defence

(5) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the accused believed that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if

    (a) the accused's belief arose from the accused's

      (i) self-induced intoxication, or

      (ii) recklessness or wilful blindness; or

    (b) the accused did not take reasonable steps, in the circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertain that the complainant was consenting.

Accused's belief as to consent

(6) If an accused alleges that he or she believed that the complainant consented to the conduct that is the subject-matter of the charge, a judge, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence and that, if believed by the jury, the evidence would constitute a defence, shall instruct the jury, when reviewing all the evidence relating to the determination of the honesty of the accused's belief, to consider the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief.

3. The heading ``Mixed Juries'' after section 626 of the Act is replaced by the following:

Support for juror with physical disability

627. The judge may permit a juror with a physical disability who is otherwise qualified to serve as a juror to have technical, personal, interpretative or other support services.

4. Subsection 631(4) of the Act is replaced by the following:

Juror and other persons to be sworn

(4) The clerk of the court shall swear each member of the jury in the order in which the names of the jurors were drawn and shall swear any other person providing technical, personal, interpretative or other support services to a juror with a physical disability.

5. Paragraph 638(1)(e) of the Act is replaced by the following:

    (e) a juror, even with technical, personal, interpretative or other support services provided to the juror under section 627, is physically unable to perform properly the duties of a juror; or

6. The portion of section 649 of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Disclosure of jury proceedings

649. Every member of a jury, and every person providing technical, personal, interpretative or other support services to a juror with a physical disability , who, except for the purposes of

7. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 715.1:

Evidence of complainant

715.2 (1) In any proceeding relating to an offence under section 151, 152, 153, 153.1, 155 or 159, subsection 160(2) or (3) or section 170, 171, 172, 173, 271, 272 or 273 in which the complainant is able to communicate evidence but may have difficulty doing so by reason of a mental or physical disability, a videotape, made within a reasonable time after the alleged offence, in which the complainant describes the acts complained of is admissible in evidence if the complainant adopts the contents of the videotape while testifying.

Order prohibiting use

(2) The presiding judge may make an order prohibiting the use of the videotape except as described in subsection (1).

R.S., c. H-6; R.S., c. 31 (1st Supp.), c. 32 (2nd Supp.); 1992, c. 22; 1993, c. 28; 1994, c. 26; 1995, c. 44; 1996, cc. 11, 14

Canadian Human Rights Act

1996, c. 14, s. 1

8. Section 2 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is replaced by the following:

Purpose

2. The purpose of this Act is to extend the laws in Canada to give effect, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, to the principle that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated , consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminatory practices based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability or conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted.

9. Section 15 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 15(1) and is amended by adding the following:

Accommoda-
tion of needs

(2) For any practice mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) to be considered to be based on a bona fide occupational requirement and for any practice mentioned in paragraph (1)(g) to be considered to have a bona fide justification, it must be established that accommodation of the needs of an individual or a class of individuals affected would impose undue hardship on the person who would have to accommodate those needs, considering health, safety and cost.

Regulations

(3) The Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing standards for assessing undue hardship.

Publication of proposed regulations

(4) Each regulation that the Governor in Council proposes to make under subsection (3) shall be published in the Canada Gazette and a reasonable opportunity shall be given to interested persons to make representations in respect of it.

Consulta-
tions

(5) The Canadian Human Rights Commission shall conduct public consultations concerning any regulation proposed to be made by the Governor in Council under subsection (3) and shall file a report of the results of the consultations with the Minister within a reasonable time after the publication of the proposed regulation in the Canada Gazette.

Exception

(6) A proposed regulation need not be published more than once, whether or not it has been amended as a result of any representations.

Making of regulations

(7) The Governor in Council may proceed to make regulations under subsection (3) after six months have elapsed since the publication of the proposed regulations in the Canada Gazette, whether or not a report described in subsection (5) is filed.

Application

(8) This section applies in respect of a practice regardless of whether it results in direct discrimination or adverse effect discrimination.

Universality of service for Canadian Forces

(9) Subsection (2) is subject to the principle of universality of service under which members of the Canadian Forces must at all times and under any circumstances perform any functions that they may be required to perform.

PART 2

OTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

10. Section 4 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is replaced by the following:

Multiple grounds of discrimina-
tion

3.1 For greater certainty, a discriminatory practice includes a practice based on one or more prohibited grounds of discrimination or on the effect of a combination of prohibited grounds.

Orders regarding discrimina-
tory practices

4. A discriminatory practice, as described in sections 5 to 14.1 , may be the subject of a complaint under Part III and anyone found to be engaging or to have engaged in a discriminatory practice may be made subject to an order as provided in sections 53 and 54.

11. Subsection 9(3) of the Act is repealed.

12. The portion of section 10 of the English version of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Discrimina-
tory policy or practice

10. It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, employee organization or employer organization

13. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 14:

Retaliation

14.1 It is a discriminatory practice for a person against whom a complaint has been filed under Part III, or any person acting on their behalf, to retaliate or threaten retaliation against the individual who filed the complaint or the alleged victim.

R.S., c. 32 (2nd Supp.), s. 41, Sch., item 3

14. (1) Paragraph 15(1)(d) of the Act is replaced by the following:

    (d) the terms and conditions of any pension fund or plan established by an employer, employee organization or employer organization provide for the compulsory vesting or locking-in of pension contributions at a fixed or determinable age in accordance with sections 17 and 18 of the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985;

(2) Paragraph 15(1)(f) of the Act is replaced by the following:

    (f) an employer, employee organization or employer organization grants a female employee special leave or benefits in connection with pregnancy or child-birth or grants employees special leave or benefits to assist them in the care of their children; or

15. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 16:

Collection of information relating to prohibited grounds

16.1 It is not a discriminatory practice to collect information relating to a prohibited ground of discrimination if the information is intended to be used in adopting or carrying out a special program, plan or arrangement under subsection 16(1).

16. Sections 20 to 22 of the Act are replaced by the following:

Certain provisions not discrimina-
tory

20. A provision of a pension or insurance fund or plan that preserves rights acquired before March 1, 1978 or that preserves pension or other benefits accrued before that day does not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer, employee organization or employer organization is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice.

Funds and plans

21. The establishment of separate pension funds or plans for different groups of employees does not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer, employee organization or employer organization is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice if the employees are not grouped in those funds or plans according to a prohibited ground of discrimination.

Regulations

22. The Governor in Council may, by regulation, prescribe the provisions of any pension or insurance fund or plan, in addition to the provisions described in sections 20 and 21, that do not constitute the basis for a complaint under Part III that an employer, employee organization or employer organization is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice.

17. Paragraph 23(a) of the Act is replaced by the following:

    (a) the prohibition of discriminatory practices described in sections 5 to 14.1 ; and

18. Section 25 of the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order: