5387766 C-32 C 32 An Act to amend the Civil Marriage Act Loi modifiant la Loi sur le mariage civil An Act to amend the Civil Marriage Act Civil Marriage of Non-residents Act Loi sur le mariage civil de non-résidents Civil Marriage of Non-residents Act 357 Royal assent received Sanction royale reçue Royal assent received 60046 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent Royal assent false 2 Senate Sénat Senate 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2 Senate Sénat Senate 2013-06-26T00:00:00 41 1 3 House Government Bill Projet de loi émanant du gouvernement (Cdc) House Government Bill true 1 House of Commons Chambre des communes House of Commons true false 820 Rob Nicholson Rob Nicholson Hon. L'hon. Hon. Minister of Justice ministre de la Justice Minister of Justice 4 Minister ministre Minister 444 Niagara Falls Niagara Falls Niagara Falls 60149 Royal assent Sanction royale 60050 Royal assent 2013-06-26T10:00:00 2 Senate Sénat Senate 0 0 181 2012-02-17T12:15:05 2013-06-18T21:50:38 2013-06-18T22:00:32 2013-06-18T23:00:00 2013-06-19T00:00:00 2013-06-21T00:00:00 2013-06-26T00:00:00 false false true true true true true true true false false 10 Regular Ordinaire Regular <div>A legislative summary is currently being prepared for this bill by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament. Meanwhile, the following executive summary is available. <br/><br/>On 17 February 2012, the Minister of Justice introduced Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Civil Marriage Act (Civil Marriage of Non-residents Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading.<br/><br/>Bill C-32 amends the Civil Marriage Act in order to provide that all marriages performed in Canada between non-residents, whether they are of the same sex or of the opposite sex, that would be valid in Canada if the spouses were domiciled in Canada are valid for the purposes of Canadian law even if one or both of the non-residents do not, at the time of the marriage, have the capacity to enter into it under the law of their respective state of domicile. It also establishes a new divorce process that allows a Canadian court to grant a divorce to non-resident spouses who reside in a state where a divorce cannot be granted to them because that state does not recognize the validity of their marriage.</div> <div>Le Service d'information et de recherche parlementaires de la Bibliothèque du Parlement rédige actuellement le résumé législatif de ce projet de loi et vous propose en attendant le sommaire suivant.<br/><br/>Le 17 février 2012, le ministre de la Justice a déposé le projet de loi C-32, Loi modifiant la Loi sur le mariage civil (Loi sur le mariage civil de non-résidents), à la Chambre des communes en première lecture.<br/><br/>Le projet de loi C-32 modifie la Loi sur le mariage civil afin de prévoir que tous les mariages célébrés au Canada entre non-résidents, qu’ils soient de même sexe ou de sexe opposé, et qui seraient valides au Canada si les époux y avaient leur domicile sont valides pour l’application du droit canadien, même si les non-résidents ou l’un deux n’ont pas, au moment du mariage, la capacité de le contracter en vertu du droit de l’État de leur domicile respectif. Il établit également une nouvelle procédure de divorce qui permet aux tribunaux canadiens d’accorder le divorce aux époux non-résidents qui résident dans un État où le divorce ne peut leur être accordé parce que la validité de leur mariage n’y est pas reconnue.</div> <div>A legislative summary is currently being prepared for this bill by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament. Meanwhile, the following executive summary is available. <br/><br/>On 17 February 2012, the Minister of Justice introduced Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Civil Marriage Act (Civil Marriage of Non-residents Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading.<br/><br/>Bill C-32 amends the Civil Marriage Act in order to provide that all marriages performed in Canada between non-residents, whether they are of the same sex or of the opposite sex, that would be valid in Canada if the spouses were domiciled in Canada are valid for the purposes of Canadian law even if one or both of the non-residents do not, at the time of the marriage, have the capacity to enter into it under the law of their respective state of domicile. It also establishes a new divorce process that allows a Canadian court to grant a divorce to non-resident spouses who reside in a state where a divorce cannot be granted to them because that state does not recognize the validity of their marriage.</div> true 2013 30 0 60029 First reading Première lecture First reading 1 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2012-02-17T12:15:05 Completed Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 83 2012-02-17T00:00:00 true 60110 0 Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 2012-02-17T00:00:00 true false 60110 Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 2012-02-17T12:15:05 2012-02-17T12:15:05 1 2012-02-17T12:15:05 false false 60030 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 1 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-18T21:50:38 Completed 0 16791 Committee of the Whole comité plénier WHOL Committee of the Whole false true false false Second reading and referral to committee Deuxième lecture et renvoi en comité Second reading and referral to committee 272 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true 8091204 5395241 2nd reading and referral to committee - WHOL 2e lecture et renvoi en comité - WHOL 2nd reading and referral to committee - WHOL 15 Agreed To Adoptée Agreed To 2013-06-18T00:00:00 272 60121 0 Second reading and referral to committee Deuxième lecture et renvoi en comité Second reading and referral to committee 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true false 60121 Second reading and referral to committee Deuxième lecture et renvoi en comité Second reading and referral to committee 2013-06-18T21:50:38 2013-06-18T21:50:38 1 2013-06-18T21:50:38 false false 60049 Consideration in committee Examen en comité Consideration in committee 1 41 1 4 Completed Terminé 2013-06-18T21:55:18 Completed 0 16791 Committee of the Whole comité plénier WHOL Committee of the Whole false true false false Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 272 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true 60124 0 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true false 60124 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2013-06-18T21:55:18 2013-06-18T21:55:18 1 2013-06-18T21:55:18 false false 60032 Report stage Étape du rapport Report stage 1 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-18T21:57:53 Completed Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 272 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true 60285 0 Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true false 60285 Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 2013-06-18T21:57:53 2013-06-18T21:57:53 1 2013-06-18T21:57:53 false false 60031 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 1 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-18T22:00:32 Completed Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 272 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true 8091213 5395243 3rd reading 3e lecture 3rd reading 15 Agreed To Adoptée Agreed To 2013-06-18T00:00:00 272 60134 0 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2013-06-18T00:00:00 true false 60134 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2013-06-18T22:00:32 2013-06-18T22:00:32 1 2013-06-18T22:00:32 false false 60029 First reading Première lecture First reading 2 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-18T23:00:00 Completed First reading Première lecture First reading 176 2013-06-18T00:00:00 false 60111 0 First reading Première lecture First reading 2013-06-18T23:00:00 true false 60111 First reading Première lecture First reading 2013-06-18T23:00:00 2013-06-18T23:00:00 1 2013-06-18T23:00:00 false false 60030 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-19T00:00:00 Completed 0 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs false true false false Debate at second reading Débat à l’étape de la deuxième lecture Debate at second reading 177 2013-06-19T00:00:00 false 60120 0 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2013-06-19T00:00:00 true false 60123 0 Referral to committee Renvoi en comité Referral to committee 2013-06-19T00:00:00 true false 60120 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2013-06-19T00:00:00 2013-06-19T00:00:00 1 2013-06-19T00:00:00 0 2 60152 Sponsor’s speech Discours du parrain Sponsor’s speech 77765 Douglas John Black Douglas John Black 3567 Conservative Conservateur Conservative 41 1 177 2013-06-19T00:00:00 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-e#34 https://sencanada.ca/fr/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-f#34 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-e#34 0 2 60153 Response speech Discours en réponse Response speech 10016 Serge Joyal Serge Joyal 132 Liberal Libéral Liberal 41 1 178 2013-06-20T00:00:00 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-e#34 https://sencanada.ca/fr/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-f#34 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/411/debates/177db_2013-06-19-e#34 true false 60049 Consideration in committee Examen en comité Consideration in committee 2 41 1 4 Completed Terminé 2013-06-20T00:00:00 Completed 0 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs false true false false Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 178 2013-06-20T00:00:00 false 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC 97 2013-06-20T00:00:00 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs 60124 0 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2013-06-20T00:00:00 true false 60124 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2013-06-20T00:00:00 2013-06-20T00:00:00 1 2013-06-20T10:39:00 false false 60031 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2 41 1 4 Completed Terminée 2013-06-21T00:00:00 Completed Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 179 2013-06-21T00:00:00 false 60134 0 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2013-06-21T00:00:00 true false 60134 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2013-06-21T00:00:00 2013-06-21T00:00:00 1 2013-06-21T00:00:00 false false 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2 41 1 0 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 181 2013-06-26T00:00:00 false 60149 0 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2013-06-26T00:00:00 true false 60149 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2013-06-26T00:00:00 2013-06-26T00:00:00 1 2013-06-26T00:00:00 false false 5395919 80701 First Reading Première lecture First Reading 6244847 80703 As passed by the House of Commons Tel qu’adopté par la Chambre des communes As passed by the House of Commons 6249899 80704 Royal Assent Royal Assent Royal Assent 0 Are some marriages more equal than others? (Emmet Macfarlane. Macleans.ca, January 12, 2012) Are some marriages more equal than others? (Emmet Macfarlane. Macleans.ca, January 12, 2012) Are some marriages more equal than others? (Emmet Macfarlane. Macleans.ca, January 12, 2012) 8 Related Links Liens connexes Related Links http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/are-some-marriages-are-more-equal-than-others/ http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/are-some-marriages-are-more-equal-than-others/ http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/are-some-marriages-are-more-equal-than-others/ 0 Les conjoints de même sexe et la loi (Québec : educaloi) Les conjoints de même sexe et la loi (Québec : educaloi) Les conjoints de même sexe et la loi (Québec : educaloi) 8 Related Links Liens connexes Related Links http://www.educaloi.qc.ca/capsules/les-conjoints-de-meme-sexe-et-la-loi http://www.educaloi.qc.ca/capsules/les-conjoints-de-meme-sexe-et-la-loi http://www.educaloi.qc.ca/capsules/les-conjoints-de-meme-sexe-et-la-loi 0 Government Introduces Amendments to the Civil Marriage Act Le gouvernement propose des modifications à la Loi sur le mariage civil Government Introduces Amendments to the Civil Marriage Act 5 Press Release Communiqué de presse Press Release http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2012/doc_32705.html http://www.justice.gc.ca/fra/nouv-news/cp-nr/2012/doc_32705.html http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2012/doc_32705.html 0 2128 Exporting same-sex marriage [electronic resource] : importing same-sex divorce Cossman, Brenda Canadian family law quarterly 32:1-20 March 2013 K3 A492, 32:1-20 1 true 0 2047 The marriage and divorce in Canada of non-domiciled and non-resident persons Castel, Jean Gabriel Canadian family law quarterly 31:297-308 Dec. 2012 K3 A492 1 true 0 1725 Same-sex marriage, same-sex cohabitation, and same-sex families around the world : why ‘same’ is so different Sáez, Macarena Journal of gender, social policy & the law 19 (1): 1-54 2011 1 true 0 2188 Canadian Bar Association fires off warning on C-32 delay Schmitz, Cristin Lawyers weekly 33:1, 23 June 14, 2013 K12 A969 1 true false false