4562516 C-30 C 30 An Act to amend the Criminal Code Loi modifiant le Code criminel An Act to amend the Criminal Code Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act Loi donnant suite à la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’affaire R. c. Shoker Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act 357 Royal assent received Sanction royale reçue Royal assent received 60046 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent Royal assent false 2 Senate Sénat Senate 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2 Senate Sénat Senate 2011-03-23T00:00:00 40 3 3 House Government Bill Projet de loi émanant du gouvernement (Cdc) House Government Bill true 1 House of Commons Chambre des communes House of Commons true false 820 Rob Nicholson Rob Nicholson Hon. L'hon. Hon. Minister of Justice ministre de la Justice Minister of Justice 4 Minister ministre Minister 444 Niagara Falls Niagara Falls Niagara Falls 60149 Royal assent Sanction royale 60050 Royal assent 2011-03-23T13:30:00 2 Senate Sénat Senate 0 0 97 2010-05-31T15:14:03 2010-12-10T15:17:02 2010-12-10T15:20:27 2010-12-13T00:00:00 2011-03-03T00:00:00 2011-03-21T17:30:00 2011-03-23T00:00:00 false false true true true true true true true false false 10 Regular Ordinaire Regular A legislative summary is currently being prepared for this bill by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament. Meanwhile, the following executive summary is available. On 31 May 2010, the Minister of Justice introduced Bill C-30, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada, in the decision R. v. Shoker, decided that such demands for bodily samples were unlawful. As a result, police and probation officers have been unable to obtain blood and other samples under probation orders, Bill C-30 amends the Criminal Code to re-establish the discretion of a court to impose conditions requiring bodily samples to be provided to police and probation officers on demand or at regular intervals where the court sees fit to prohibit the individual from consuming drugs and alcohol in order to enforce compliance with a prohibition on consuming drugs or alcohol imposed in a probation order, a conditional sentence order or a recognizance under section 810, 810.01, 810.1 or 810.2 of the Criminal Code. Le Service d'information et de recherche parlementaires de la Bibliothèque du Parlement rédige actuellement le résumé législatif de ce projet de loi et vous propose en attendant le sommaire suivant. Le 31 mai 2010, le ministre de la Justice a déposé le projet de loi C-30, Loi modifiant le Code criminel (Loi donnant suite à la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’affaire R. c. Shoker), à la Chambre des communes en première lecture. En 2006, la Cour suprême du Canada, dans l'arrêt R. c. Shoker, a conclu à l'illégalité de telles demandes d'échantillons de substances corporelles. Par conséquent, les policiers et les agents de probation sont incapables d'obtenir des échantillons de sang et d'autres substances corporelles de gens assujettis à une ordonnance de probation. Le projet de loi C-30 modifie le Code criminel afin de rétablir le pouvoir discrétionnaire du tribunal d'imposer des conditions exigeant la remise d'échantillons de substances corporelles aux policiers et aux agents de probation sur demande ou périodiquement lorsque le tribunal interdit au délinquant de consommer de la drogue et de l'alcool. Le texte modifie le Code criminel de manière de permettre le contrôle du respect de l’interdiction de consommer des drogues ou de l’alcool dont peut être assortie une ordonnance de probation, une ordonnance de sursis, ou un engagement prévu aux articles 810, 810.01, 810.1 ou 810.2 de cette loi. A legislative summary is currently being prepared for this bill by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament. Meanwhile, the following executive summary is available. On 31 May 2010, the Minister of Justice introduced Bill C-30, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada, in the decision R. v. Shoker, decided that such demands for bodily samples were unlawful. As a result, police and probation officers have been unable to obtain blood and other samples under probation orders, Bill C-30 amends the Criminal Code to re-establish the discretion of a court to impose conditions requiring bodily samples to be provided to police and probation officers on demand or at regular intervals where the court sees fit to prohibit the individual from consuming drugs and alcohol in order to enforce compliance with a prohibition on consuming drugs or alcohol imposed in a probation order, a conditional sentence order or a recognizance under section 810, 810.01, 810.1 or 810.2 of the Criminal Code. true 2011 7 0 60029 First reading Première lecture First reading 1 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2010-05-31T15:14:03 Completed Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 52 2010-05-31T00:00:00 true 60110 0 Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 2010-05-31T00:00:00 true false 60110 Introduction and first reading Dépôt et première lecture Introduction and first reading 2010-05-31T15:14:03 2010-05-31T15:14:03 1 2010-05-31T15:14:03 false false 60030 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 1 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2010-12-10T15:17:02 Completed 0 16249 Committee of the Whole comité plénier WHOL Committee of the Whole false true false false Debate at second reading Débat à l’étape de la deuxième lecture Debate at second reading 113 2010-12-08T00:00:00 true Debate at second reading Débat à l’étape de la deuxième lecture Debate at second reading 115 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true 3664902 4565174 2nd reading and referral to committee - JUST 2e lecture et renvoi en comité - JUST 2nd reading and referral to committee - JUST 15 Agreed To Adoptée Agreed To 12 By unanimous consent Du consentement unanime By unanimous consent 2010-12-10T00:00:00 115 60121 0 Second reading and referral to committee Deuxième lecture et renvoi en comité Second reading and referral to committee 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true false 60121 Second reading and referral to committee Deuxième lecture et renvoi en comité Second reading and referral to committee 2010-12-10T15:17:02 2010-12-10T15:17:02 1 2010-12-10T15:17:02 0 1 3648092 60152 Sponsor’s speech Discours du parrain Sponsor’s speech 35340 Daniel Petit Daniel Petit Conservative Conservateur Conservative 40 3 113 2010-12-08T16:29:27 0 1 3648555 60153 Response speech Discours en réponse Response speech 289 Marlene Jennings Marlene Jennings Liberal Libéral Liberal 40 3 113 2010-12-08T16:58:49 0 1 3649061 60153 Response speech Discours en réponse Response speech 18766 Serge Ménard Serge Ménard Bloc Québécois Bloc Québécois Bloc Québécois 40 3 113 2010-12-08T17:28:40 0 1 3664858 60153 Response speech Discours en réponse Response speech 1803 Joe Comartin Joe Comartin NDP NPD NDP 40 3 115 2010-12-10T10:14:06 false false 60049 Consideration in committee Examen en comité Consideration in committee 1 40 3 4 Completed Terminé 2010-12-10T15:18:57 Completed 0 16249 Committee of the Whole comité plénier WHOL Committee of the Whole false true false false Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 115 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true 60124 0 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true false 60124 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2010-12-10T15:18:57 2010-12-10T15:18:57 1 2010-12-10T15:18:57 false false 60032 Report stage Étape du rapport Report stage 1 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2010-12-10T15:19:51 Completed Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 115 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true 60285 0 Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true false 60285 Concurrence at report stage Adoption à l’étape du rapport Concurrence at report stage 2010-12-10T15:19:51 2010-12-10T15:19:51 1 2010-12-10T15:19:51 false false 60031 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 1 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2010-12-10T15:20:27 Completed Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 115 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true 3664907 4565176 3rd reading 3e lecture 3rd reading 15 Agreed To Adoptée Agreed To 12 By unanimous consent Du consentement unanime By unanimous consent 2010-12-10T00:00:00 115 60134 0 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2010-12-10T00:00:00 true false 60134 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2010-12-10T15:20:27 2010-12-10T15:20:27 1 2010-12-10T15:20:27 false false 60029 First reading Première lecture First reading 2 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2010-12-13T00:00:00 Completed First reading Première lecture First reading 77 2010-12-13T00:00:00 false 60111 0 First reading Première lecture First reading 2010-12-13T00:00:00 true false 60111 First reading Première lecture First reading 2010-12-13T00:00:00 2010-12-13T00:00:00 1 2010-12-13T00:00:00 false false 60030 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2011-03-03T00:00:00 Completed 0 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs false true false false Debate at second reading Débat à l’étape de la deuxième lecture Debate at second reading 86 2011-02-15T00:00:00 false Debate at second reading Débat à l’étape de la deuxième lecture Debate at second reading 91 2011-03-03T00:00:00 false 60120 0 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2011-03-03T00:00:00 true false 60123 0 Referral to committee Renvoi en comité Referral to committee 2011-03-03T00:00:00 true false 60120 Second reading Deuxième lecture Second reading 2011-03-03T00:00:00 2011-03-03T00:00:00 1 2011-03-03T00:00:00 0 2 60152 Sponsor’s speech Discours du parrain Sponsor’s speech 35184 W. David Angus W. David Angus 3 Conservative Conservateur Conservative 40 3 86 2011-02-15T00:00:00 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/086db_2011-02-15-e#39 https://sencanada.ca/fr/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/086db_2011-02-15-f#39 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/086db_2011-02-15-e#39 0 2 60153 Response speech Discours en réponse Response speech 9 George Baker George Baker 174 Liberal Libéral Liberal 40 3 91 2011-03-03T00:00:00 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/091db_2011-03-03-e#35 https://sencanada.ca/fr/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/091db_2011-03-03-f#35 https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/403/debates/091db_2011-03-03-e#35 true false 60049 Consideration in committee Examen en comité Consideration in committee 2 40 3 4 Completed Terminé 2011-03-10T00:00:00 Completed 0 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs false true false false Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 94 2011-03-10T00:00:00 false 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC 53 2011-03-09T00:00:00 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs 16102 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Comité sénatorial permanent des affaires juridiques et constitutionnelles LCJC 54 2011-03-10T00:00:00 Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs 60124 0 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2011-03-10T00:00:00 true false 60124 Committee report presented Présentation du rapport de comité Committee report presented 2011-03-10T00:00:00 2011-03-10T00:00:00 1 2011-03-10T10:34:00 false false 60031 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2 40 3 4 Completed Terminée 2011-03-21T17:30:00 Completed Debate at third reading Débat à l’étape de la troisième lecture Debate at third reading 95 2011-03-21T00:00:00 false 60134 0 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2011-03-21T17:30:00 true false 60134 Third reading Troisième lecture Third reading 2011-03-21T17:30:00 2011-03-21T17:30:00 1 2011-03-21T17:30:00 false false 60050 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2 40 3 0 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 97 2011-03-23T00:00:00 false 60149 0 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2011-03-23T00:00:00 true false 60149 Royal assent Sanction royale Royal assent 2011-03-23T00:00:00 2011-03-23T00:00:00 1 2011-03-23T00:00:00 false false 4566414 80701 First Reading Première lecture First Reading 4872975 80703 As passed by the House of Commons Tel qu’adopté par la Chambre des communes As passed by the House of Commons 5075708 80704 Royal Assent Royal Assent Royal Assent 0 Government of Canada Introduces Legislation to Enforce Court Orders Requiring Offenders to Abstain from Drug and Alcohol Use Le gouvernement du Canada dépose un projet de loi visant l’application des ordonnances judiciaires qui imposent aux délinquants l’interdiction de consommer de la drogue et de l’alcool Government of Canada Introduces Legislation to Enforce Court Orders Requiring Offenders to Abstain from Drug and Alcohol Use 5 Press Release Communiqué de presse Press Release 0 Backgrounder: Drug and Alcohol Prohibition Compliance Fiche d'information : Respect de l’interdiction de consommer Backgrounder: Drug and Alcohol Prohibition Compliance 7 Background Documents Document(s) d'information Background Documents 4181642 C-55 C 55 An Act to amend the Criminal Code Loi modifiant le Code criminel An Act to amend the Criminal Code Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act Loi donnant suite à la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l'affaire R. c. Shoker Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act 349 At second reading in the House of Commons À la deuxième lecture à la Chambre des communes At second reading in the House of Commons 60043 First reading Première lecture First reading First reading in the House of Commons false 1 0 60029 First reading Première lecture First reading 1 House of Commons Chambre des communes House of Commons 2009-10-30T12:06:17 40 2 0 House Government Bill Projet de loi émanant du gouvernement (Cdc) House Government Bill false 1 true false 0 0001-01-01T00:00:00 0 0 0 2009-10-30T12:06:17 false false true false false false false false false false false 0 false 0 false false false false