From 25-26 February 2009, Senator Jerry
Grafstein, Co-Chair of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group
(IPG), led a delegation of Canadian Parliamentarians to Washington, D.C.
Delegates met with almost 40 members of the US Senate and House of
Representatives and their staff (Appendix A). At a press conference on 27
February 2009, Senator Grafstein and Mr. Gord Brown, M.P., Vice-Chair of the
IPG, summarized the major themes conveyed to their federal counterparts as well
as to US governors and others, since IPG members also participated in the
National Governors Association meeting on 21-23 February and in a meeting with
the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region on 24 February in Washington (see
separate reports tabled for these meetings).
The primary focus of the Congressional
visits was meetings with US Senators and Representatives to discuss such key
concerns as the Buy American provisions in the US stimulus package, management
of the shared border, energy and environmental issues, trade in softwood lumber
and Canada’s contributions in Afghanistan. The visits were similar in intent to
previous Congressional visits in respect of such issues as bovine spongiform
encephalopathy, trade in softwood lumber, energy and border issues, including
the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI).
Congressional visits provide IPG
members with an important opportunity to meet with US federal legislators who
do not attend the Group’s annual meeting, and thereby to inform them about –
and gain their support on – critical issues affecting both countries. More
generally, the IPG believes that Congressional visits are an invaluable
opportunity to share Canadian views about bilateral issues of shared concern,
and intends to undertake such visits in the future as the need arises. Since
the meetings with federal legislators are designed to be “off the record,” the
discussion below summarizes the general nature of the issues that were raised
by Canadian and American legislators.
ISSUES RAISED BY THE CANADIAN
SECTION OF THE CANADA-UNITED STATES INTER-PARLIAMENTARY GROUP
THE US STIMULUS PACKAGE AND THE BUY
AMERICAN PROVISIONS
·The Buy American provisions in the federal
stimulus package in the US are leading to pressures in Canada for the adoption
of Buy Canada / Buy Canadian requirements, with similar pressures arising in
some provinces.
·The protectionism inherent in the Buy American
provisions in the US federal stimulus package is not what is needed as attempts
are made to restore global financial stability and economic growth.
·The Buy American/Buy State provisions that exist
in state legislation are problematic for Canada, particularly in light of the
significant proportion of the funds in the US federal stimulus package that
will be allocated by the states to infrastructure projects.
·Canada supports fair and
free trade, and is continuing to sign free trade agreements, including with Colombia and Peru.
·Countries in the European Union are concerned
about the Buy American provisions in the US federal stimulus package.
·Some Canadians find it difficult to understand
such US actions as the Buy American provisions in the federal stimulus package
and in respect of trade irritants in light of the contribution that is being
made by Canada Forces personnel in Afghanistan.
THE SHARED BORDER
·The shared border between the US and Canada is
relatively thicker today than it was five years ago, and is associated with
delays and fees that lead to relatively higher monetary and time costs for
travellers and businesses.
·From the perspective of some Canadians, it is
ludicrous that the border we share with the US is becoming "militarized," with gunboats and drone planes.
·The enhanced driver’s licence initiative between
Washington and British Columbia is a successful measure that is being adopted
and considered by other states and provinces, and should be expanded.
·In thinking about the shared border, it should
be remembered that 35 US states have Canada as their primary foreign export
market and that more than 7 million American jobs depend on bilateral trade
with Canada.
·In addition to the important economic
relationship shared between Canada and the US, and the consequences of the
border for that relationship, the social, cultural and family relationships
that exist between the two countries, and the implications of the border for
those relationships, must also be remembered.
·Canada acts responsibly in terms of immigration
and security.
·The borders that the US shares with Canada and with Mexico are different, and the different problems that exist at each shared border
require different solutions.
·The importance of a well-functioning border is
particularly important as the Pacific Northwest region prepares for the 2010
Winter Olympic Games, which will be held in British Columbia but which will
have tourism impacts throughout the region.
·In light of the 2010 Winter Olympic Games, it
would be ideal if implementation of the land and sea aspects of the Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative could be delayed until the completion of the
Games.
·In order to expedite the movement of those
travelling to the 2010 Winter Olympic Games by public transit, consideration
should be given to how buses and trains can be expeditiously cleared at the
border.
·In addition to the importance of a smoothly
functioning Canada-US border for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games in British
Columbia, the daily importance of a smoothly functioning border for trade,
social and cultural reasons should be recognized, particularly for those
sectors that are integrated on a North American, or Canada-US, basis.
ENERGY
·Canada is a reliable,
strategic, safe and secure supplier of a range of energy sources to the United States.
·Canada has a huge
reserve of oil in the oil sands, and this oil will be important for US prosperity.
·A number of American companies have made
investments in Canada’s oil sands.
·There is some concern in Canada about provisions
such as section 526 in the US Energy Independence and Security Act, since the
oil sands are not "dirty."
·While Canada would like to continue to supply
energy to the US, it is possible for a pipeline to be built to Canada’s West
Coast in order that energy can instead be exported to other countries.
·Canada produces a great deal of
hydroelectricity, which is a renewable, clean energy resource that is exported
to the Northeastern United States.
·Canada is doing what it
can to expedite construction of the Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline.
·Canada and the United States are working together on a number of carbon capture and storage projects.
·In Alberta, carbon has been priced at $15 per
tonne.
·Canada is willing to
work with the United States on the development of a cap-and-trade system.
·Our countries should work together on a North
American energy strategy, and this strategy should incorporate the full range
of non-renewable and renewable energy sources, including nuclear.
·While recognizing that Canada is an important source of energy, it should be remembered that Canada too wants a clean
environment and takes its environmental responsibilities seriously.
SOFTWOOD LUMBER
·Canada and the US signed the Softwood Lumber
Agreement, and both countries should abide by the terms of the agreement in
order to avoid re-igniting a trade dispute.
·The softwood lumber industry in both Canada and
the US is in difficulty because of declines in the housing market.
·Bilateral trade in softwood lumber has been
problematic for more than 100 years, and becomes a particular trade dispute
periodically.
CANADA’S CONTRIBUTIONS IN
AFGHANISTAN
·The contribution being made by Canadian Forces
personnel in Afghanistan is significant and unwavering, but it is at the limit
of Canada’s capability.
·On a per capita basis, Canadian Forces personnel
in Afghanistan are experiencing the greatest rate of deaths and injuries.
·A number of other countries, including Italy,
France and Germany, are not "doing their part" in Afghanistan.
·Some Canadian Forces personnel are training at
US military bases, including in North Carolina.
ISSUES RAISED BY AMERICAN LEGISLATORS
THE US STIMULUS PACKAGE AND THE BUY
AMERICAN PROVISIONS
·The Buy American provisions in the US federal
stimulus package are exactly the types of measures that are implemented during
difficult economic times and, to some extent, are nothing more than political
rhetoric.
·The economic downturn is resulting in pressures
to employ as much domestic labour as possible and, at times such as these, it
is politically expedient to say "close the border and employ our own
people."
·Some Americans believe that the Buy American
provisions in the US federal stimulus package are a tangible indication of the
extent to which decision makers are "pandering" to labour unions.
·In the view of some, the last thing a country
should do when things start to unwind is become protectionist.
·Some US states are bound by World Trade
Organization government procurement provisions.
·Some believe that the US federal stimulus
package is really a spending bill, that the result will be inflation and a
lower standard of living, and that the package is merely delaying the
inevitable since "you must hit the bottom before you begin to rise to the
top."
·In the view of some, the US federal stimulus
package has ruined the incentive for states to be fiscally disciplined.
THE SHARED BORDER
·Canada and the US should work together on
border-related issues that are of common concern.
·Some are worried about having personal
information stored in a single, centralized database.
·Regarding the Western Hemisphere Travel
Initiative, some believe that the technology should be tested on a pilot basis
before the land and sea aspects are fully implemented, and that education
efforts should be enhanced in order that people are fully aware of the
Initiative’s timelines, requirements and acceptable documentation.
ENERGY
·Many Americans recognize that Canada is the largest and safest supplier of energy to the US.
·The United States needs Canadian energy.
·Many US states have abundant coal resources, and
making coal a clean energy source is a key objective.
·Some believe that section 529 of the US Energy
Independence and Security Act should have been eliminated.
·Despite the fact that renewable energy standards
in place in the United States do not consider hydroelectricity to be a
renewable resource, this interpretation is incorrect, since hydroelectricity is
a completely renewable resource.
·A number of energy and/or energy-related bills
are likely to be introduced in the US Senate.
·Some are disappointed that President Barack
Obama’s speech to the US Congress on 24 February 2009 did not contain any
mention of nuclear energy, in part because some states do not have oil and
cannot depend on wind energy.
·The US needs a diverse portfolio of renewable
and non-renewable energy sources, and none should be ruled out.
·A carbon tax is relatively more
"honest" than is a cap-and-trade system.
·A cap-and-trade system will "kill" a
number of small businesses.
·Some US companies are active in the Alberta oil sands.
·Some Americans recognize that Canada is doing a lot in respect of carbon dioxide and other environmental considerations.
·Now is the time to develop a good, cogent North
American energy policy.
·As the US moves toward the use of more renewable
energy, traditional energy sources will still be required.
SOFTWOOD LUMBER
·Declines in the housing market are resulting in
difficulties for the softwood lumber industry, and you will always "hear
the squeal" when consumption falls.
·In the view of some, if there is going to be a
housing recovery in the US, relatively less expensive Canadian lumber will be
needed.
·Relevant parties should work together in order
to resolve issues related to softwood lumber trade between Canada and the US.
CANADA’S CONTRIBUTIONS IN
AFGHANISTAN
·The US appreciates that Canada is a close friend
and ally, including on the front lines in Afghanistan.
·Only Canada and the US seem to be willing to put
the lives of their armed forces personnel "on the line."
·Canada and the US should work on a joint
Afghanistan policy that "makes sense."
·The situation in Afghanistan is becoming increasingly
complicated, and corruption seems to be endemic.
OTHER ISSUES
·The US would not want the same type of health
care system as Canada, and it should be remembered that some Canadians travel
to the US in order to access health care.
·Many communities in the US are losing
manufacturing jobs.
·Since Canada’s view of Cuba differs from the US’
view, Canada could play a useful role should the US decide to revisit its views
about Cuba.
·President Barack Obama will be unable to re-open
the North American Free Trade Agreement.
·Rail expansion should occur in order that Alaska
can be linked to the lower 48 states in the US.
·Although the global warming issue started in the
United Nations, the issue has since been "captured" by Hollywood.
·Not all of the science suggesting the existence
of climate change is reliable.
·As a general rule, both countries should sit
down and find the common ground needed to go forward.
·Both Canada and the US have sectors that
"need to work" in order for the economies in the two countries to
"work."
·Pacific Rim countries are key competitors for
North American firms, and at least some of these countries have relatively
lower environmental, labour and other standards that enable them to produce at
a relatively lower cost.
·Large agribusiness is using the shared Canada-US
border as a way of getting out of some regulations.
·A number of Americans are proud that Canada is
the US’ northern neighbour.
·Country-of-origin labelling is important for a
variety of reasons, including the ability to let consumers know the source of
their food, although when animals are born in one country and fattened in
another, it may become difficult to determine the label that should be applied.
·Since such consumer goods as t-shirts are
labelled, the food that people eat should be labelled too.
·The existence of bovine spongiform
encephalopathy has prompted some to become more concerned about food labelling
requirements.
·Should Asian carp enter the Great Lakes system,
both Canada and the US will be harmed.
Respectfully submitted,
Hon. Jerahmiel Grafstein, Senator
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary Group
Gord Brown, M.P.
Co-Chair
Canada-United States
Inter-Parliamentary GroupGroup